Zhang Guo-Qiang, Wang Yan, Chen Ji-Ying, Zhou Yong-Gang, Cao Xiu-Tang, Chai Wei, Ni Ming, Li Xiang
Department of Orthopedics, General Hospital of People's Liberation Army, Beijing, 100853, China.
J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci. 2013 Aug;33(4):606-610. doi: 10.1007/s11596-013-1166-z. Epub 2013 Aug 1.
This study evaluated the clinical effect of impaction bone graft and distal press-fit fixation for the reconstruction of severe femoral bone defect in revision total hip arthroplasty. A total of 234 patients (involving 236 hips) with Paprosky III and IV femoral bone defects were treated with the revision total hip arthroplasty from June 1998 to Aug. 2006. Impaction bone graft technique was used for 112 hips, with allogeneic freeze-dried bone as bone graft and SPII as prosthesis. With 124 hips, modular distal press-fit fixation and tapered femoral stem (MP stem) were employed. After the operation, the subjects were followed up on regular basis and results were assessed by using the Harris Hip Score (HHS) and 12-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12). Radiolucence, subsidence and loosening were observed and complications, including infection, fracture, dislocation etc. were recorded. A 6-14-year follow-up showed that prostheses failed, due to infection, in 4 patients of impaction bone graft group and that 6 patients in the press-fit fixation group experienced prosthesis failure, with the survival rates for the two techniques being 96.43% and 95.16%, respectively. One-way ANOVA showed that prosthesis survival was significantly associated with surgery-related complications (P<0.05) and was not related to the type of the bone defects (P>0.05). The rate of complications bore significant association with the type of bone defects in the two groups (P<0.05). Our study showed that the two revision methods could achieve satisfactory mid-term and long-term results for the reconstruction of severe bone defects. It is of great significance for attaining high prosthesis survival rate to select suitable operation on the basis of the type of bone defect. Careful operative manipulation and post-operative rehabilitation aimed at reducing complications are also important.
本研究评估了打压植骨及远端压配固定技术在翻修全髋关节置换术中重建严重股骨骨缺损的临床效果。1998年6月至2006年8月,共234例(236髋)患有Paprosky III型和IV型股骨骨缺损的患者接受了翻修全髋关节置换术。112髋采用打压植骨技术,使用同种异体冻干骨作为植骨材料,SPII作为假体。124髋采用模块化远端压配固定及锥形股骨干假体(MP柄)。术后对患者进行定期随访,采用Harris髋关节评分(HHS)和12项简明健康调查量表(SF - 12)进行结果评估。观察透亮线、下沉及松动情况,并记录感染、骨折、脱位等并发症。6至14年的随访结果显示,打压植骨组有4例患者因感染导致假体失败,压配固定组有6例患者出现假体失败,两种技术的生存率分别为96.43%和95.16%。单因素方差分析显示,假体生存率与手术相关并发症显著相关(P<0.05),与骨缺损类型无关(P>0.05)。两组并发症发生率与骨缺损类型显著相关(P<0.05)。我们的研究表明,两种翻修方法在重建严重骨缺损方面均可取得满意的中长期效果。根据骨缺损类型选择合适的手术方式对于获得高假体生存率具有重要意义。谨慎的手术操作及旨在减少并发症的术后康复也很重要。