Smith Denise L, Fehling Patricia C, Hultquist Eric M, Arena Logan, Lefferts Wesley K, Haller Jeannie M, Storer Thomas W, Cooper Christopher B
a Department of Health and Exercise Sciences, Skidmore College, 815 North Broadway, Saratoga Springs, NY 12866, USA.
Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2013 Sep;38(9):935-40. doi: 10.1139/apnm-2012-0489. Epub 2013 Jul 4.
The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of precooling on the chronotropic index defined as the slope of the heart rate (HR) and oxygen uptake during incremental exercise. Ten men performed incremental exercise following 2 conditions: control (rest in a thermoneutral laboratory, 21.5 ± 0.7 °C; performed first) and precooling (cold-water immersion, 23.1 ± 0.2 °C). Prior to exercise, core temperature was significantly lower for precooling (36.6 ± 0.3 °C) compared with control (37.1 ± 0.4 °C; p < 0.001) and remained lower throughout exercise (p < 0.05). Time to volitional fatigue during the incremental exercise test was significantly longer in the control (914 ± 97 s) compared with precooling (889 ± 97 s; p = 0.015). Precooling reduced HR by 8-10 beats·min(-1) compared with control throughout exercise (peak HR: precooling, 178 ± 9 beats·min(-1); control, 188 ± 6 beats·min(-1); p = 0.001). Oxygen uptake did not differ between conditions (p > 0.05). The chronotropic index did not differ between conditions (p = 0.301); however, the y intercept was significantly lower (p = 0.009) for precooling (53.6 ± 11.0) compared with control (67.3 ± 11.0). Thus, the benefit of precooling was a lower HR that was maintained throughout exercise rather than a reduced rate of rise in HR. These results suggest the potential use of precooling to mitigate cardiovascular strain in individuals working at elevated metabolic rates. However, the reduced exercise time warrants consideration.
本研究的目的是调查预冷对变时指数的影响,变时指数定义为递增运动期间心率(HR)与摄氧量的斜率。10名男性在两种条件下进行递增运动:对照组(在温度适中的实验室休息,21.5±0.7°C;先进行)和预冷组(冷水浸泡,23.1±0.2°C)。运动前,预冷组的核心温度(36.6±0.3°C)显著低于对照组(37.1±0.4°C;p<0.001),且在整个运动过程中均保持较低水平(p<0.05)。递增运动测试中,对照组的自愿疲劳时间(914±97秒)显著长于预冷组(889±97秒;p = 0.015)。与对照组相比,预冷在整个运动过程中使心率降低了8 - 10次·分钟⁻¹(峰值心率:预冷组,178±9次·分钟⁻¹;对照组,188±6次·分钟⁻¹;p = 0.001)。两种条件下的摄氧量无差异(p>0.05)。变时指数在两种条件下无差异(p = 0.301);然而,预冷组的y轴截距(53.6±11.0)显著低于对照组(67.3±11.0)(p = 0.009)。因此,预冷的益处是在整个运动过程中维持较低的心率,而非降低心率上升速率。这些结果表明,预冷有可能用于减轻代谢率升高的个体的心血管负担。然而,运动时间缩短值得考虑。