Suppr超能文献

了解医院转诊率:用户指南。

Understanding hospital referral rates: a user's guide.

作者信息

Roland M O, Bartholomew J, Morrell D C, McDermott A, Paul E

机构信息

Cambridge University School of Clinical Medicine, Addenbrooke's Hospital.

出版信息

BMJ. 1990 Jul 14;301(6743):98-102. doi: 10.1136/bmj.301.6743.98.

Abstract

Detailed referral information from one practice was used to investigate the effect of calculating referral rates in several different ways. Referral rates for individual general practitioners should be related to the number of consultations carried out and not to the number of registered patients; for whole practices list size may be used as the denominator. Most doctors will not need to control for age and sex of patients when comparing referral rates but may need to control for case mix when comparing referral rates to individual specialties. In addition, a method is described for distinguishing systematic variation between the referral rates of individual doctors from the random variation that may arise from data based on fairly small numbers of referrals. The method indicates whether systematic variation is greater than would be expected by chance, and it can be extended to indicate whether variability in referral rates is greater in one specialty than another. Because of random variation with time a year's data may not be sufficient to allow reliable interpretation of referral rates to individual specialties, except for the largest. At present there is no known relation between high or low referral rates and quality of care. Nevertheless, if doctors are to interpret their own rates of referral they need those rates to be reliable and valid. Use of the 10 guidelines described in this paper will help to prevent unwarranted conclusions being drawn from information on general practitioners' rates of referral to hospital.

摘要

来自一家医疗机构的详细转诊信息被用于研究以几种不同方式计算转诊率的效果。个体全科医生的转诊率应与所进行的诊疗次数相关,而非与注册患者数量相关;对于整个医疗机构,名单规模可作为分母。在比较转诊率时,大多数医生在比较转诊率时无需控制患者的年龄和性别,但在将转诊率与各个专科进行比较时可能需要控制病例组合。此外,还描述了一种方法,用于区分个体医生转诊率之间的系统差异与可能因基于相当少量转诊数据而产生的随机差异。该方法表明系统差异是否大于偶然预期,并且可以扩展以表明一个专科的转诊率变异性是否大于另一个专科。由于随时间的随机变化,一年的数据可能不足以对各个专科的转诊率进行可靠解释,除了最大的专科。目前,高或低转诊率与医疗质量之间尚无已知关联。然而,如果医生要解释他们自己的转诊率,他们需要这些率是可靠和有效的。使用本文所述的10条指南将有助于防止从全科医生转诊到医院的信息中得出无根据的结论。

相似文献

1
Understanding hospital referral rates: a user's guide.了解医院转诊率:用户指南。
BMJ. 1990 Jul 14;301(6743):98-102. doi: 10.1136/bmj.301.6743.98.
4
Outcomes of referrals from general practice.全科医疗转诊的结果。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 1995 Dec;13(4):287-93. doi: 10.3109/02813439508996777.
8
Variability in GPs' referral rates in Spain.西班牙全科医生转诊率的差异。
Fam Pract. 1995 Jun;12(2):159-62. doi: 10.1093/fampra/12.2.159.

引用本文的文献

4
GPs with special interests: unanswered questions.有特殊兴趣的全科医生:未解决的问题。
Br J Gen Pract. 2007 Nov;57(544):912-7. doi: 10.3399/096016407782317865.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验