McClure M Joy, Xu Joy H, Craw Jeffrey P, Lane Sean P, Bolger Niall, Shrout Patrick E
Adelphi University.
J Pers. 2014 Dec;82(6):563-74. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12061. Epub 2013 Oct 21.
The benefits of close relationships for mental and physical health are well documented. One of the mechanisms presumed to underlie these effects is social support, whereby close others provide practical and emotional assistance in times of need. Although there is no doubt that generalized perceptions of support availability are beneficial, research examining actual instances of support receipt has found unexpectedly mixed results. Receiving support sometimes has positive effects, but null or even negative effects are common. In this article, we review our multimethod program of research that seeks to understand and explain the costs of receiving social support. We focus on reductions in the recipient's sense of relationship equity and self-efficacy as mechanisms of this effect and examine a number of other moderating factors. Although we have found that receiving support incurs costs on average, there is considerable variability yet to be explained. Using diary data from 312 persons preparing to take a challenging exam, we examined the potential of individual differences in neuroticism, agreeableness, and attachment insecurity to explain variability in experienced support costs. We close with new questions about why received support may be beneficial or benign in some situations while being especially toxic in others.
亲密关系对身心健康的益处已有充分记录。一种被认为是这些影响背后的机制是社会支持,即亲密的他人在需要时提供实际和情感上的帮助。虽然毫无疑问,对支持可用性的普遍认知是有益的,但研究实际获得支持的情况却发现了出人意料的复杂结果。获得支持有时会产生积极影响,但无影响甚至负面影响也很常见。在本文中,我们回顾了我们的多方法研究项目,该项目旨在理解和解释获得社会支持的代价。我们将重点关注受助者关系公平感和自我效能感的降低,将其作为这种影响的机制,并研究一些其他调节因素。虽然我们发现平均而言获得支持会产生代价,但仍有相当大的变异性有待解释。我们使用了312名准备参加具有挑战性考试的人的日记数据,研究了神经质、宜人性和依恋不安全感方面的个体差异,以解释所经历的支持代价的变异性。我们最后提出了一些新问题,即为什么在某些情况下获得的支持可能是有益的或无害的,而在其他情况下却特别有害。