1Department of Psychology, Washington University in St. Louis.
Psychol Sci. 2013 Sep;24(9):1791-800. doi: 10.1177/0956797613481233. Epub 2013 Aug 1.
Identifying the processes by which people remember to execute an intention at an appropriate moment (prospective memory) remains a fundamental theoretical challenge. According to one account, top-down attentional control is required to maintain activation of the intention, initiate intention retrieval, or support monitoring. A diverging account suggests that bottom-up, spontaneous retrieval can be triggered by cues that have been associated with the intention and that sustained attentional processes are not required. We used a specialized experimental design and functional MRI methods to selectively marshal and identify each process. Results revealed a clear dissociation. One prospective-memory task recruited sustained activity in attentional-control areas, such as the anterior prefrontal cortex; the other engaged purely transient activity in parietal and ventral brain regions associated with attentional capture, target detection, and episodic retrieval. These patterns provide critical evidence that there are two neural routes to prospective memory, with each route emerging under different circumstances.
确定人们在适当的时刻记住执行意图的过程(前瞻性记忆)仍然是一个基本的理论挑战。根据一种说法,需要自上而下的注意力控制来维持意图的激活、启动意图检索或支持监控。另一种说法则认为,由与意图相关联的线索自发引发的、自下而上的、自发的检索可以被触发,而不需要持续的注意力过程。我们使用专门的实验设计和功能磁共振成像方法来有选择地调动和识别每个过程。结果显示出明显的分离。一个前瞻性记忆任务招募了注意力控制区域(如前前额叶皮层)的持续活动;另一个则仅在与注意力捕获、目标检测和情景检索相关的顶叶和腹侧脑区中产生短暂的活动。这些模式提供了关键证据,表明存在两种通向前瞻性记忆的神经途径,每种途径在不同的情况下出现。