Ballard Elizabeth D, Stanley Ian H, Horowitz Lisa M, Pao Maryland, Cannon Elizabeth A, Bridge Jeffrey A
Postdoctoral Fellow, Division of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205,
Clin Pediatr Emerg Med. 2013 Mar;14(1):20-27. doi: 10.1016/j.cpem.2013.01.001.
The emergency department (ED) is a promising setting to screen youth for suicide risk. Patient reactions to questions about suicidal thoughts and behaviors during their ED visit have implications for how screening is introduced, developed, and implemented. The current study is a qualitative investigation into patient opinions about screening for suicide risk in the pediatric ED. As part of a subset of a multisite study, 165 participants, 10 to 21 years old, were included in this sub-analysis. Ninety percent (148/165) of participants supported suicide risk screening. Reasons youth support screening included prevention of suicide, detection of at-risk youth, and a lack of other social support. Overall, pediatric patients agreed with suicide risk screening in the ED, citing similar reasons as in a previous investigation, further demonstrating acceptability of suicide risk screening in this setting. A small subset of youth (10%; 17/165) did not support screening for reasons that included a desire to focus on their chief (i.e., nonpsychiatric) presenting concern and fear of iatrogenic risk. Understanding patient opinions, including those in support of and in opposition to screening, can inform implementation practices. Further education about the importance of suicide risk assessment may be a helpful first step in instituting universal screening efforts.
急诊科(ED)是筛查青少年自杀风险的一个很有前景的场所。患者在急诊科就诊期间对有关自杀想法和行为问题的反应,对筛查的引入、开展和实施方式具有影响。当前的研究是对儿科急诊科患者关于自杀风险筛查的意见进行的定性调查。作为一项多地点研究的一个子研究的一部分,165名年龄在10至21岁之间的参与者被纳入此次子分析。90%(148/165)的参与者支持自杀风险筛查。青少年支持筛查的原因包括预防自杀、发现有风险的青少年以及缺乏其他社会支持。总体而言,儿科患者同意在急诊科进行自杀风险筛查,理由与之前的一项调查相似,这进一步证明了在这种情况下自杀风险筛查的可接受性。一小部分青少年(10%;17/165)不支持筛查,原因包括希望专注于他们主要的(即非精神科的)就诊问题以及担心医源性风险。了解患者的意见,包括支持和反对筛查的意见,可为实施措施提供参考。关于自杀风险评估重要性的进一步教育可能是开展普遍筛查工作的有益第一步。