School of Psychology, Queen's University Belfast Belfast, UK ; Trinity College Institute of Neuroscience and School of Psychology, Trinity College Dublin Dublin, Ireland.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Jul 29;7:397. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00397. eCollection 2013.
Cross education is the process whereby training of one limb gives rise to enhancements in the performance of the opposite, untrained limb. Despite interest in this phenomenon having been sustained for more than a century, a comprehensive explanation of the mediating neural mechanisms remains elusive. With new evidence emerging that cross education may have therapeutic utility, the need to provide a principled evidential basis upon which to design interventions becomes ever more pressing. Generally, mechanistic accounts of cross education align with one of two explanatory frameworks. Models of the "cross activation" variety encapsulate the observation that unilateral execution of a movement task gives rise to bilateral increases in corticospinal excitability. The related conjecture is that such distributed activity, when present during unilateral practice, leads to simultaneous adaptations in neural circuits that project to the muscles of the untrained limb, thus facilitating subsequent performance of the task. Alternatively, "bilateral access" models entail that motor engrams formed during unilateral practice, may subsequently be utilized bilaterally-that is, by the neural circuitry that constitutes the control centers for movements of both limbs. At present there is a paucity of direct evidence that allows the corresponding neural processes to be delineated, or their relative contributions in different task contexts to be ascertained. In the current review we seek to synthesize and assimilate the fragmentary information that is available, including consideration of knowledge that has emerged as a result of technological advances in structural and functional brain imaging. An emphasis upon task dependency is maintained throughout, the conviction being that the neural mechanisms that mediate cross education may only be understood in this context.
交叉教育是指通过训练一只肢体,从而提高未训练的另一只肢体的表现的过程。尽管人们对这种现象的兴趣已经持续了一个多世纪,但对于介导神经机制的全面解释仍然难以捉摸。随着新的证据表明交叉教育可能具有治疗效用,提供一个有原则的证据基础来设计干预措施的需求变得越来越迫切。一般来说,交叉教育的机制解释与两种解释框架之一一致。“交叉激活”模型包含了这样一种观察结果,即单侧执行运动任务会导致皮质脊髓兴奋性的双侧增加。相关的推测是,这种分布式活动在单侧练习时存在,会导致投射到未训练肢体肌肉的神经回路同时适应,从而促进任务的后续表现。或者,“双侧访问”模型需要在单侧练习期间形成的运动记忆可能随后被双侧利用,也就是说,通过构成两个肢体运动控制中心的神经回路利用。目前,直接证据的缺乏使得相应的神经过程能够被描绘出来,或者在不同的任务环境中确定它们的相对贡献。在当前的综述中,我们试图综合和吸收现有的零碎信息,包括考虑由于结构和功能脑成像技术进步而出现的知识。在整个过程中,我们都强调任务的依赖性,因为我们相信,介导交叉教育的神经机制只能在这种情况下才能被理解。