• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

如何在正畸研究中报告可靠性:第 2 部分。

How to report reliability in orthodontic research: Part 2.

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.

出版信息

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013 Aug;144(2):315-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.03.023.

DOI:10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.03.023
PMID:23910214
Abstract

Proper statistical analysis is an absolutely essential tool for both clinicians and researchers attempting to implement evidence-based decisions. When analyzing reliability, statistical graphic representation is the best method. Other previously published error studies of 2-dimensional measurements, such as cephalometric landmarks, have inappropriately applied 1-dimensional approaches, such as linear or angular measurements. The aim of this article is to illustrate a graphic presentation method that can be applied to 2-dimensional data sets. We propose that this technique can show errors in both the x-axis and the y-axis simultaneously and should be used when reporting the reliability of a 2-dimensional data set. Our prediction error analysis of soft-tissue changes after orthognathic surgery will be presented as an example. By using different colors in each ellipse, this method can also identify any between-group differences.

摘要

正确的统计分析是临床医生和研究人员试图做出循证决策的绝对必要工具。在分析可靠性时,统计图形表示是最佳方法。其他以前发表的关于二维测量的误差研究,如头影测量标志点,不恰当地应用了一维方法,如线性或角度测量。本文的目的是说明一种可应用于二维数据集的图形表示方法。我们提出,这种技术可以同时显示 x 轴和 y 轴上的误差,并且在报告二维数据集的可靠性时应该使用这种技术。我们将对面部整形手术后软组织变化的预测误差分析作为一个例子进行介绍。通过在每个椭圆中使用不同的颜色,这种方法还可以识别任何组间差异。

相似文献

1
How to report reliability in orthodontic research: Part 2.如何在正畸研究中报告可靠性:第 2 部分。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013 Aug;144(2):315-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.03.023.
2
How to report reliability in orthodontic research: Part 1.如何报告正畸研究中的可靠性:第 1 部分。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013 Jul;144(1):156-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.03.014.
3
Effect of training and experience on cephalometric measurement errors on surgical patients.训练和经验对手术患者头影测量误差的影响。
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg. 1997;12(3):204-13.
4
What are we reading? An analysis of the orthodontic literature 1999 to 2008.我们在阅读什么?对 1999 年至 2008 年正畸文献的分析。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011 May;139(5):e471-84. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.07.023.
5
How to test validity in orthodontic research: a mixed dentition analysis example.正畸研究中如何检验效度:一个混合牙列分析的例子
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2015 Feb;147(2):272-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2014.09.021.
6
Comparison of landmark identification in traditional versus computer-aided digital cephalometry.传统与计算机辅助数字化头影测量中标志点识别的比较。
Angle Orthod. 2000 Oct;70(5):387-92. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2000)070<0387:COLIIT>2.0.CO;2.
7
Comparative cephalometric errors for orthodontic and surgical patients.正畸和外科手术患者的头影测量误差比较。
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg. 1995;10(2):119-26.
8
A proposal for soft tissue landmarks for craniofacial analysis using 3-dimensional laser scan imaging.一项关于使用三维激光扫描成像进行颅面分析的软组织标志点的提议。
World J Orthod. 2006 Spring;7(1):7-14.
9
Reliability and the smallest detectable differences of lateral cephalometric measurements.侧颅面测量的可靠性和最小可检测差异。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010 Nov;138(5):546.e1-8; discussion 546-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.05.013.
10
Factorial trial.析因试验。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2012 Jul;142(1):147-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.03.020.

引用本文的文献

1
Automated landmark-based mid-sagittal plane: reliability for 3-dimensional mandibular asymmetry assessment on head CT scans.基于自动地标点的正中矢状面:头部CT扫描三维下颌骨不对称评估的可靠性
Clin Oral Investig. 2025 May 26;29(6):311. doi: 10.1007/s00784-025-06397-z.
2
Predicting orthognathic surgery results as postoperative lateral cephalograms using graph neural networks and diffusion models.使用图神经网络和扩散模型将正颌外科手术结果预测为术后头颅侧位片。
Nat Commun. 2025 Mar 16;16(1):2586. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-57669-x.
3
Craniofacial growth prediction models based on cephalometric landmarks in Korean and American children.
基于韩国和美国儿童头影测量标志点的颅面生长预测模型。
Angle Orthod. 2025 Mar 1;95(2):219-226. doi: 10.2319/052324-399.1.
4
Evaluation of an individualized facial growth prediction model based on the multivariate partial least squares method.基于多元偏最小二乘法的个体化面部生长预测模型评估。
Angle Orthod. 2022 Nov 1;92(6):705-713. doi: 10.2319/110121-807.1.
5
Automated landmark identification on cone-beam computed tomography: Accuracy and reliability.锥束计算机断层扫描上的自动地标识别:准确性与可靠性。
Angle Orthod. 2022 Sep 1;92(5):642-654. doi: 10.2319/122121-928.1. Epub 2022 Jun 2.
6
Assessment of reliability in orthodontic literature.正畸文献可靠性评估。
Angle Orthod. 2022 May 1;92(3):409-414. doi: 10.2319/081021-625.1.
7
Three-Dimensional Cephalometric Landmarking and Frankfort Horizontal Plane Construction: Reproducibility of Conventional and Novel Landmarks.三维头影测量标志点定位与法兰克福平面构建:传统标志点与新型标志点的可重复性
J Clin Med. 2021 Nov 15;10(22):5303. doi: 10.3390/jcm10225303.
8
Evaluation of an automated superimposition method for computer-aided cephalometrics.自动叠加法在计算机辅助头影测量中的评价。
Angle Orthod. 2020 May 1;90(3):390-396. doi: 10.2319/071319-469.1.
9
Automated identification of cephalometric landmarks:自动识别头影测量标志点:
Angle Orthod. 2020 Jan;90(1):69-76. doi: 10.2319/022019-129.1. Epub 2019 Jul 22.
10
Automated identification of cephalometric landmarks: .自动识别头影测量标志点:.
Angle Orthod. 2019 Nov;89(6):903-909. doi: 10.2319/022019-127.1. Epub 2019 Jul 8.