• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

护士在事件披露中的贡献:叙事综述。

The contribution of nurses to incident disclosure: a narrative review.

机构信息

Institute of Psychological Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, England, United Kingdom.

University of York, York, England, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Int J Nurs Stud. 2014 Feb;51(2):334-45. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2013.07.001. Epub 2013 Jul 30.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2013.07.001
PMID:23910400
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To explore (a) how nurses feel about disclosing patient safety incidents to patients, (b) the current contribution that nurses make to the process of disclosing patient safety incidents to patients and (c) the barriers that nurses report as inhibiting their involvement in disclosure.

DESIGN

A systematic search process was used to identify and select all relevant material. Heterogeneity in study design of the included articles prohibited a meta-analysis and findings were therefore synthesised in a narrative review.

DATA SOURCES

A range of text words, synonyms and subject headings were developed in conjunction with the York Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and used to undertake a systematic search of electronic databases (MEDLINE; EMBASE; CENTRAL; PsycINFO; Health Management and Information Consortium; CINAHL; ASSIA; Science Citation Index; Social Science Citation Index; Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews; Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects; Health Technology Assessment Database; Health Systems Evidence; PASCAL; LILACS). Retrieval of studies was restricted to those published after 1980. Further data sources were: websites, grey literature, research in progress databases, hand-searching of relevant journals and author contact.

REVIEW METHODS

The title and abstract of each citation was independently screened by two reviewers and disagreements resolved by consensus or consultation with a third person. Full text articles retrieved were further screened against the inclusion and exclusion criteria then checked by a second reviewer (YB). Relevant data were extracted and findings were synthesised in a narrative empirical synthesis.

RESULTS

The systematic search and selection process identified 15 publications which included 11 unique studies that emerged from a range of locations. Findings suggest that nurses currently support both physicians and patients through incident disclosure, but may be ill-prepared to disclose incidents independently. Barriers to nurse involvement included a lack of opportunities for education and training, and the multiple and sometimes conflicting roles within nursing.

CONCLUSIONS

Numerous potential benefits were identified that may result from nurses having a greater contribution to the disclosure process, but the provision of support and training is essential to overcome the reported barriers faced by nurses internationally.

摘要

目的

探讨(a)护士对向患者披露患者安全事件的感受,(b)护士目前对向患者披露患者安全事件所做的贡献,以及(c)护士报告的阻碍其参与披露的障碍。

设计

系统搜索过程用于识别和选择所有相关材料。由于纳入文章的研究设计存在异质性,因此无法进行荟萃分析,研究结果以叙述性综述的形式综合呈现。

资料来源

与约克评论与传播中心合作制定了一系列文本词、同义词和主题词,并用于对电子数据库(MEDLINE;EMBASE;CENTRAL;PsycINFO;健康管理与信息联盟;CINAHL;ASSIA;科学引文索引;社会科学引文索引;Cochrane 系统评价数据库;效应摘要数据库;健康技术评估数据库;健康系统证据;PASCAL;LILACS)进行系统搜索。检索的研究仅限于 1980 年后发表的研究。其他资料来源包括:网站、灰色文献、正在进行的研究数据库、相关期刊的手工检索以及作者联系。

审查方法

两位评审员独立筛选每条引文的标题和摘要,如有分歧,则通过协商或咨询第三位评审员解决。检索到的全文文章进一步根据纳入和排除标准进行筛选,然后由第二位评审员(YB)进行检查。提取相关数据并进行叙述性实证综合。

结果

系统的搜索和选择过程确定了 15 篇出版物,其中包括来自不同地点的 11 项独特研究。研究结果表明,护士目前通过事件披露为医生和患者提供支持,但可能对独立披露事件准备不足。护士参与的障碍包括缺乏教育和培训机会,以及护理角色的多样性和有时的冲突性。

结论

从护士对披露过程做出更大贡献可能带来的诸多潜在益处,以及为护士提供支持和培训以克服国际上护士面临的报告障碍。

相似文献

1
The contribution of nurses to incident disclosure: a narrative review.护士在事件披露中的贡献:叙事综述。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2014 Feb;51(2):334-45. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2013.07.001. Epub 2013 Jul 30.
2
Effectiveness of interventions that assist caregivers to support people with dementia living in the community: a systematic review.干预措施对帮助照顾者支持社区中痴呆症患者的有效性:系统评价。
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2008 Jun;6(2):137-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-1609.2008.00090.x.
3
Experiences of registered nurses as managers and leaders in residential aged care facilities: a systematic review.注册护士在养老院的管理和领导经验:系统评价。
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2011 Dec;9(4):388-402. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-1609.2011.00239.x.
4
The effectiveness of interventions to meet family needs of critically ill patients in an adult intensive care unit: a systematic review update.成人重症监护病房中满足重症患者家庭需求的干预措施的有效性:系统评价更新
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Mar;14(3):181-234. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-2477.
5
Systematic review of evidence on the impact of nursing workload and staffing on establishing healthy work environments.系统评价护理工作量和人员配置对建立健康工作环境的影响的证据。
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2006 Dec;4(4):337-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-6988.2006.00055.x.
6
7
A systematic review of the effectiveness of strategies and interventions to improve the transition from student to newly qualified nurse.系统评价策略和干预措施对改善学生到新合格护士过渡的有效性。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2015 Jul;52(7):1254-68. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2015.03.007. Epub 2015 Mar 20.
8
Computerised decision support systems in order communication for diagnostic, screening or monitoring test ordering: systematic reviews of the effects and cost-effectiveness of systems.计算机决策支持系统在诊断、筛查或监测检验申请方面的交流应用:系统的效果和成本效益的系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2010 Oct;14(48):1-227. doi: 10.3310/hta14480.
9
Workplace training for senior trainees: a systematic review and narrative synthesis of current approaches to promote patient safety.高级实习生的职场培训:促进患者安全的当前方法的系统评价与叙述性综合分析
Postgrad Med J. 2015 Oct;91(1080):579-87. doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2014-133130. Epub 2015 Aug 12.
10
The experiences of midwives and nurses collaborating to provide birthing care: a systematic review.助产士与护士合作提供分娩护理的经验:一项系统综述。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Nov;13(11):74-127. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2444.

引用本文的文献

1
Second Victims Among Austrian Nurses (SeViD-A2 Study).奥地利护士中的“二次受害者”(SeViD-A2研究)。
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Oct 17;12(20):2061. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12202061.
2
Why Not Blow the Whistle on Health Care Insurance Fraud? Evidence from Jiangsu Province, China.为何不揭发医疗保险欺诈行为?来自中国江苏省的证据。
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2022 Oct 12;15:1897-1915. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S379300. eCollection 2022.
3
Quality assessment with diverse studies (QuADS): an appraisal tool for methodological and reporting quality in systematic reviews of mixed- or multi-method studies.
质量评估多种研究(QuADS):一种用于系统评价混合或多方法研究的方法学和报告质量的评估工具。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Feb 15;21(1):144. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06122-y.
4
Investigation of medical error-reporting system and reporting status in Iran in 2019.2019年伊朗医疗差错报告系统及报告状况调查。
J Educ Health Promot. 2020 Oct 30;9:272. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_73_20. eCollection 2020.
5
Perception Gaps of Disclosure of Patient Safety Incidents Between Nurses and the General Public in Korea.护士和公众对韩国患者安全事件披露的认知差距。
J Patient Saf. 2021 Dec 1;17(8):e971-e975. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000781.
6
Conceptualisation of African primal health care within mental health care.心理健康护理中非洲原始医疗保健的概念化。
Curationis. 2018 Mar 22;41(1):e1-e11. doi: 10.4102/curationis.v41i1.1753.
7
Student Self-Assessment and Faculty Assessment of Performance in an Interprofessional Error Disclosure Simulation Training Program.跨专业错误披露模拟培训项目中学生的自我评估与教师对表现的评估
Am J Pharm Educ. 2017 Apr;81(3):54. doi: 10.5688/ajpe81354.
8
Aged-care nurses in rural Tasmanian clinical settings more likely to think hypothetical medication error would be reported and disclosed compared to hospital and community nurses.与医院和社区护士相比,塔斯马尼亚农村临床环境中的老年护理护士更有可能认为假设的用药错误会被报告和披露。
Aust J Rural Health. 2015 Dec;23(6):346-51. doi: 10.1111/ajr.12229.