• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一期吻合加预防性造口术与 Hartmann 手术治疗穿孔性憩室炎的对比——造口还纳率的比较。

Primary anastomosis with a defunctioning stoma versus Hartmann's procedure for perforated diverticulitis--a comparison of stoma reversal rates.

机构信息

Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Pauwelsstr. 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany,

出版信息

Int J Colorectal Dis. 2013 Dec;28(12):1681-8. doi: 10.1007/s00384-013-1753-2. Epub 2013 Aug 3.

DOI:10.1007/s00384-013-1753-2
PMID:23913315
Abstract

PURPOSE

The ideal treatment of patients with perforated diverticulitis is still controversial. Hartmann's procedure has been the treatment of choice for decades, but primary anastomosis with a defunctioning stoma has become an accepted alternative. The aim of this study was to evaluate the stoma reversal rates after these two surgical strategies.

METHODS

A retrospective review of the data from patients with perforated sigmoid diverticulitis between 2002 and 2011 undergoing a Hartmann's procedure (HP) versus a primary anastomosis with a defunctioning stoma (PA) was performed. Additionally, patients were contacted by mail or telephone in March 2012 using a standardized questionnaire.

RESULTS

A total of 98 patients were identified: 72 undergoing HP and 26 patients receiving PA. The median follow-up time was 63 months (range 4-118). Whilst 85 % of patients with PA have had their stoma reversed, only 58 % of patients with an HP had a stoma reversal (p = 0.046). The median period until stoma reversal was significantly longer for HP (19 weeks) than for PA (12 weeks; p = 0.03). The 30-day mortality for PA was 12 % as opposed to 25 % for HP (p = 0.167). According to the Clavien-Dindo classification, surgical complications occurred significantly less frequently in patients with PA (p = 0.014).

CONCLUSION

The stoma reversal rates for PA are significantly higher than for HP. Thus, depending on the overall clinical situation, primary resection and anastomosis with a proximal defunctioning stoma might be the optimal procedure for selected patients with perforated diverticular disease.

摘要

目的

对于穿孔性憩室炎患者的理想治疗方法仍存在争议。几十年来,Hartmann 手术一直是首选治疗方法,但带预防性造口的一期吻合术已成为一种公认的替代方法。本研究旨在评估这两种手术策略后的造口逆转率。

方法

回顾性分析 2002 年至 2011 年间接受 Hartmann 手术(HP)与带预防性造口的一期吻合术(PA)治疗的穿孔性乙状结肠憩室炎患者的数据。此外,于 2012 年 3 月使用标准化问卷通过邮件或电话联系患者。

结果

共确定了 98 例患者:72 例行 HP,26 例行 PA。中位随访时间为 63 个月(范围 4-118)。虽然 85%的 PA 患者已行造口逆转,但只有 58%的 HP 患者行造口逆转(p=0.046)。HP 患者行造口逆转的中位时间明显长于 PA(19 周比 12 周;p=0.03)。PA 的 30 天死亡率为 12%,而 HP 为 25%(p=0.167)。根据 Clavien-Dindo 分类,PA 患者的手术并发症发生率明显低于 HP(p=0.014)。

结论

PA 的造口逆转率明显高于 HP。因此,根据整体临床情况,对于穿孔性憩室炎患者,带预防性造口的一期切除术和吻合术可能是一种优化的选择。

相似文献

1
Primary anastomosis with a defunctioning stoma versus Hartmann's procedure for perforated diverticulitis--a comparison of stoma reversal rates.一期吻合加预防性造口术与 Hartmann 手术治疗穿孔性憩室炎的对比——造口还纳率的比较。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2013 Dec;28(12):1681-8. doi: 10.1007/s00384-013-1753-2. Epub 2013 Aug 3.
2
Restoration of bowel continuity after surgery for acute perforated diverticulitis: should Hartmann's procedure be considered a one-stage procedure?急性穿孔性憩室炎手术后肠道连续性的恢复:Hartmann手术应被视为一期手术吗?
Colorectal Dis. 2009 Jul;11(6):619-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2008.01667.x. Epub 2008 Aug 21.
3
Hartmann's procedure versus sigmoidectomy with primary anastomosis for perforated diverticulitis with purulent or fecal peritonitis: Three-year follow-up of a randomised controlled trial.Hartmann 手术与一期吻合术治疗伴有脓性或粪性腹膜炎的穿孔性憩室炎:一项随机对照试验的 3 年随访。
Int J Surg. 2022 Feb;98:106221. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.106221. Epub 2022 Jan 10.
4
Operative strategies for diverticular peritonitis: a decision analysis between primary resection and anastomosis versus Hartmann's procedures.憩室性腹膜炎的手术策略:一期切除吻合术与哈特曼手术的决策分析
Ann Surg. 2007 Jan;245(1):94-103. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000225357.82218.ce.
5
Hartmann's Procedure or Primary Anastomosis for Generalized Peritonitis due to Perforated Diverticulitis: A Prospective Multicenter Randomized Trial (DIVERTI).Hartmann手术与原发性吻合术治疗因憩室炎穿孔所致弥漫性腹膜炎:一项前瞻性多中心随机试验(DIVERTI)
J Am Coll Surg. 2017 Dec;225(6):798-805. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2017.09.004. Epub 2017 Sep 22.
6
Sigmoid resection with primary anastomosis versus the Hartmann's procedure for perforated diverticulitis with purulent or fecal peritonitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.乙状结肠切除术一期吻合术与哈特曼手术治疗伴有脓性或粪性腹膜炎的穿孔性憩室炎:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2020 Aug;35(8):1371-1386. doi: 10.1007/s00384-020-03617-8. Epub 2020 Jun 5.
7
Perforated sigmoid diverticulitis: Hartmann's procedure or resection with primary anastomosis-a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised control trials.穿孔性乙状结肠憩室炎:Hartmann 手术还是切除加一期吻合术——随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Tech Coloproctol. 2018 Oct;22(10):743-753. doi: 10.1007/s10151-018-1819-9. Epub 2018 Jul 11.
8
Hartmann's procedure versus sigmoidectomy with primary anastomosis for perforated diverticulitis with purulent or faecal peritonitis (LADIES): a multicentre, parallel-group, randomised, open-label, superiority trial.Hartmann 手术与一期吻合术治疗伴有脓性或粪便性腹膜炎的穿孔性憩室炎(LADIES):一项多中心、平行组、随机、开放标签、优效性试验。
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Aug;4(8):599-610. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(19)30174-8. Epub 2019 Jun 6.
9
Primary anastomosis or Hartmann's procedure for patients with diverticular peritonitis? A systematic review.原发性吻合术还是哈特曼手术用于憩室性腹膜炎患者?一项系统评价。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2004 Nov;47(11):1953-64. doi: 10.1007/s10350-004-0701-1.
10
Short- and long-term outcomes for primary anastomosis versus Hartmann's procedure in Hinchey III and IV diverticulitis: a multivariate logistic regression analysis of risk factors.Hinchey III 和 IV 型憩室炎行一期吻合术与 Hartmann 手术的短期和长期结局:危险因素的多变量逻辑回归分析。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2021 Feb;406(1):121-129. doi: 10.1007/s00423-020-02015-6. Epub 2020 Oct 20.

引用本文的文献

1
HARTMANN PROCEDURE OR RESECTION WITH PRIMARY ANASTOMOSIS FOR TREATMENT OF PERFORATED DIVERTICULITIS? SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS.Hartmann 手术或一期吻合术治疗穿孔性憩室炎?系统评价和荟萃分析。
Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2021 Jan 15;33(3):e1546. doi: 10.1590/0102-672020200003e1546. eCollection 2021.
2
Mortality and Morbidity After Hartmann's Procedure Versus Primary Anastomosis Without a Diverting Stoma for Colorectal Perforation: A Nationwide Observational Study.Hartmann手术与无转流造口的一期吻合术治疗结直肠穿孔后的死亡率和发病率:一项全国性观察性研究
World J Surg. 2018 Mar;42(3):866-875. doi: 10.1007/s00268-017-4193-2.
3

本文引用的文献

1
A multicenter randomized clinical trial of primary anastomosis or Hartmann's procedure for perforated left colonic diverticulitis with purulent or fecal peritonitis.左半结肠憩室炎合并脓性或粪性腹膜炎行一期吻合术或 Hartmann 手术的多中心随机临床试验。
Ann Surg. 2012 Nov;256(5):819-26; discussion 826-7. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31827324ba.
2
Danish national guidelines for treatment of diverticular disease.丹麦憩室病治疗国家指南。
Dan Med J. 2012 May;59(5):C4453.
3
Laparoscopic peritoneal lavage for perforated sigmoid diverticulitis.
Considerations in Stoma Reversal.
造口回纳的注意事项。
Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2017 Jul;30(3):172-177. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1598157. Epub 2017 May 22.
4
Resection enterostomy versus Hartmann's procedure for emergency colonic resections.急诊结肠切除术的肠切除吻合术与哈特曼手术对比
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2017 Aug;32(8):1171-1177. doi: 10.1007/s00384-017-2808-6. Epub 2017 Apr 7.
5
A historical review of surgery for peritonitis secondary to acute colonic diverticulitis: from Lockhart-Mummery to evidence-based medicine.急性结肠憩室炎继发腹膜炎手术治疗的历史回顾:从洛克哈特-马默里到循证医学。
World J Emerg Surg. 2017 Mar 9;12:14. doi: 10.1186/s13017-017-0120-y. eCollection 2017.
6
Laparoscopic treatment of complicated colonic diverticular disease: A review.腹腔镜治疗复杂性结肠憩室病:综述
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2016 Feb 27;8(2):134-42. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v8.i2.134.
7
Hartmann's procedure and laparoscopic reversal versus primary anastomosis and ileostomy closure for left colonic perforation.哈特曼手术及腹腔镜复位术与左半结肠穿孔的一期吻合术及回肠造口关闭术的比较
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2015 Jul;400(5):609-16. doi: 10.1007/s00423-015-1319-6. Epub 2015 Jun 26.
8
Diverticular disease: changing epidemiology and management.憩室病:不断变化的流行病学与管理
Drugs Aging. 2015 May;32(5):349-60. doi: 10.1007/s40266-015-0260-2.
9
Position paper: management of perforated sigmoid diverticulitis.立场文件:乙状结肠穿孔性憩室炎的处理。
World J Emerg Surg. 2013 Dec 26;8(1):55. doi: 10.1186/1749-7922-8-55.
腹腔镜下乙状结肠憩室穿孔患者的腹腔灌洗。
Colorectal Dis. 2012 Feb;14(2):135-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2011.02606.x.
4
Long-term outcome after conservative and surgical treatment of acute sigmoid diverticulitis.保守治疗与手术治疗急性乙状结肠憩室炎的长期疗效比较。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2011 Aug;396(6):825-32. doi: 10.1007/s00423-011-0815-6. Epub 2011 Jun 18.
5
Diversion stoma after colorectal surgery: loop colostomy or ileostomy?结直肠手术后的转流造口术:袢式结肠造口术还是回肠造口术?
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2011 Apr;26(4):431-6. doi: 10.1007/s00384-010-1123-2. Epub 2011 Jan 11.
6
Co-morbidity and postsurgical outcome in patients with perforated sigmoid diverticulitis.合并症与穿孔性乙状结肠憩室炎患者的术后转归。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2011 Feb;26(2):227-34. doi: 10.1007/s00384-010-1017-3. Epub 2010 Jul 30.
7
Spectrum of disease and outcome among patients with acute diverticulitis.急性憩室炎患者的疾病谱和转归。
Dig Surg. 2010 Aug;27(3):190-6. doi: 10.1159/000236903. Epub 2010 Jun 22.
8
Current indications and role of surgery in the management of sigmoid diverticulitis.目前手术在乙状结肠憩室炎治疗中的适应证和作用。
World J Gastroenterol. 2010 Feb 21;16(7):804-17. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i7.804.
9
Avoiding or reversing Hartmann's procedure provides improved quality of life after perforated diverticulitis.避免或逆转 Hartmann 手术可提高穿孔性憩室炎患者的生活质量。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2010 Apr;14(4):651-7. doi: 10.1007/s11605-010-1155-5. Epub 2010 Feb 2.
10
Conventional and laparoscopic reversal of the Hartmann procedure: a review of literature.经腹会阴联合切除术后传统与腹腔镜下的手术复位:文献回顾。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2010 Apr;14(4):743-52. doi: 10.1007/s11605-009-1084-3.