Suppr超能文献

输尿管结石的急诊与择期输尿管镜治疗

Emergency versus elective ureteroscopic treatment of ureteral stones.

作者信息

Matani Yousef S, Al-Ghazo Mohammed A, Al-Azab Rami S, Hani Osamah Bani, Ghalayini Ibrahim F, Hani Ibrahim Bani

机构信息

King Abdullah University Hospital, Department of Surgery and Urology, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Medicine, Irbid, Jordan.

出版信息

Can Urol Assoc J. 2013 Jul-Aug;7(7-8):E470-4. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.1402.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

This retrospective study investigates the role of the emergency ureteroscopic (URS) approach in the definitive treatment of ureteric stones.

METHODS

We reviewed all patients admitted for ureteric stones from May 2003 to December 2010. Those who underwent URS stone treatment were selected and stratified into emergency (EMG) and elective groups (ELG). Emergency URS is defined as URS being performed within 24 hours of admission to the emergency room. The main indication for emergency treatment was refractory ureteric colic in spite of narcotic analgesia. Both groups were statistically compared in terms of their patient-, stone- and outcome-related variables. The overall success rate was defined by the clearance of the stone and/or presence of residual fragments (<3 mm) at the end of 4-week follow-up period.

RESULTS

In total, 903 patients were suitable for analysis with 244 and 659 patients in the EMG and ELG, respectively. Age, sex and comorbidities were comparable in both groups. Average ages were 43.4 ± 15.31 and 45.6 ± 13.24 years among EMG and ELG, respectively. Stones had an average size of 0.92 ± 0.49 (in the EMG group) and 0.96 ± 0.53 cm (in the ELG group). We found that 61.1% and 65.7% of stones were distally located in the EMG and ELG, respectively. EMG had a longer operative time (69 ± 21.03 vs. 57 ± 13.45 minutes) with comparable average hospital stays (1.9 days). Intra-operative double-J stents or ureteric catheter insertion was noted in 72.5 and 67.7% of EMG and ELG, respectively. The overall complication rates were reported in 13.1% in EMG and 14.4% in ELG. A higher rate of ureteric injuries (early and late) was documented in the EMG group (7% vs. 5.6%). Most of these injuries were minor and manageable without additional procedure and/or general anesthesia. Success was achieved in 90.6% and 91.8% of the EMG and ELG groups, respectively.

CONCLUSION

With recent advances in technology, the growing trend toward one-stage definitive treatment, patient acceptability and rising concerns over financial aspects, emergency URS treatment of ureteric stones is evolving as a standard initial management option.

摘要

引言

本回顾性研究探讨急诊输尿管镜检查(URS)方法在输尿管结石确定性治疗中的作用。

方法

我们回顾了2003年5月至2010年12月期间因输尿管结石入院的所有患者。选择接受URS结石治疗的患者,并将其分为急诊组(EMG)和择期组(ELG)。急诊URS定义为在进入急诊室后24小时内进行URS。急诊治疗的主要指征是尽管使用了麻醉性镇痛药仍有难治性输尿管绞痛。对两组患者在患者、结石和结局相关变量方面进行统计学比较。总体成功率定义为在4周随访期结束时结石清除和/或存在残留碎片(<3 mm)。

结果

总共903例患者适合分析,其中急诊组244例,择期组659例。两组患者的年龄、性别和合并症具有可比性。急诊组和择期组的平均年龄分别为43.4±15.31岁和45.6±13.24岁。结石平均大小在急诊组为0.92±0.49 cm,在择期组为0.96±0.53 cm。我们发现,急诊组和择期组分别有61.1%和65.7%的结石位于远端。急诊组手术时间更长(69±21.03分钟对57±13.45分钟),平均住院时间相当(1.9天)。急诊组和择期组分别有72.5%和67.7%的患者术中插入双J支架或输尿管导管。急诊组和择期组的总体并发症发生率分别为13.1%和14.4%。急诊组输尿管损伤(早期和晚期)发生率更高(7%对5.6%)。这些损伤大多数较轻,无需额外手术和/或全身麻醉即可处理。急诊组和择期组的成功率分别为90.6%和91.8%。

结论

随着技术的最新进展、一期确定性治疗的趋势增加、患者的可接受性以及对财务方面的日益关注,输尿管结石的急诊URS治疗正在演变为一种标准的初始管理选择。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

2
Contemporary management of ureteral stones.当代输尿管结石的治疗。
Eur Urol. 2012 Apr;61(4):764-72. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.01.009. Epub 2012 Jan 14.
7
The management of ureteric stones.输尿管结石的治疗
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2010 Jul;92(5):368-72. doi: 10.1308/003588410X12664192075693.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验