Department of Psychiatry, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Phoenix, AZ 85016, USA.
Personal Disord. 2013 Jul;4(3):286-8. doi: 10.1037/per0000003.
Comments on the article by S. C. South and N. J. DeYoung (see record 2012-01744-001). This commentary examines how behavior genetic research can be used to inform the revision of personality disorders (PDs) during the transition from DSM-IV to DSM-5. Although supportive of the proposal put forth by the work group that extreme personality traits need to be distinguished from personality disorder by the presence of disorganization in personality structure and function, South and DeYoung note the absence of behavior genetics data on the levels of personality functioning and the new general criteria for personality disorder that incorporate impairment in personality functioning as the "A criterion." They also note, however, that literature supporting this type of definition with its focus on aspects of self-concept and interpersonal relations is rapidly growing.
评论 S. C. South 和 N. J. DeYoung 的文章（见记录 2012-01744-001）。本评论探讨了行为遗传学研究如何在从 DSM-IV 到 DSM-5 的转变过程中为人格障碍（PD）的修订提供信息。尽管支持工作组提出的观点，即需要通过人格结构和功能的紊乱来区分极端人格特质和人格障碍，但 South 和 DeYoung 指出，行为遗传学数据缺乏关于人格功能水平的研究，并且新的人格障碍一般标准将人格功能障碍纳入“A 标准”。然而，他们也指出，支持这种以自我概念和人际关系为重点的定义类型的文献正在迅速增加。
