Clinical Psychology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA.
Personal Disord. 2013 Jul;4(3):289-90. doi: 10.1037/per0000004.
Comments on the article by S. C. South and N. J. DeYoung (see record 2012-01744-001). This commentary articulates how behavior genetics research could influence personality disorder (PD) classification. South and DeYoung also critique the bases offered by the working group for retaining certain PDs and not others. Although the present author agrees with South and DeYoung that "more information is needed on implementation of the proposed personality trait system" (p. 279)-overall I believe adopting the DSM-5 working group proposal would significantly improve PD research and practice.
评论 S. C. South 和 N. J. DeYoung 的文章（见记录 2012-01744-001）。这篇评论阐明了行为遗传学研究如何影响人格障碍（PD）分类。South 和 DeYoung 还批评了工作组保留某些 PD 而不保留其他 PD 的依据。尽管作者本人同意 South 和 DeYoung 的观点，即“需要更多关于拟议人格特质系统实施的信息”（第 279 页）——但总体而言，我认为采用 DSM-5 工作组的建议将极大地改善 PD 研究和实践。
