• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

较长聚焦波束和脉冲持续时间在超声推进中用于重新定位尿路结石和碎片的安全性和有效性。

Safety and Effectiveness of a Longer Focal Beam and Burst Duration in Ultrasonic Propulsion for Repositioning Urinary Stones and Fragments.

作者信息

Janssen Karmon M, Brand Timothy C, Cunitz Bryan W, Wang Yak-Nam, Simon Julianna C, Starr Frank, Liggitt H Denny, Thiel Jeff, Sorensen Mathew D, Harper Jonathan D, Bailey Michael R, Dunmire Barbrina

机构信息

1 Department of Urology, Madigan Army Medical Center , Tacoma, Washington.

2 Applied Physics Laboratory, Center for Industrial and Medical Ultrasound, University of Washington , Seattle, Washington.

出版信息

J Endourol. 2017 Aug;31(8):793-799. doi: 10.1089/end.2017.0167. Epub 2017 Jun 26.

DOI:10.1089/end.2017.0167
PMID:28537452
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5567608/
Abstract

PURPOSE

In the first-in-human trial of ultrasonic propulsion, subjects passed collections of residual stone fragments repositioned with a C5-2 probe. Here, effectiveness and safety in moving multiple fragments are compared between the C5-2 and a custom (SC-50) probe that produces a longer focal beam and burst duration.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Effectiveness was quantified by the number of stones expelled from a calyx phantom consisting of a 30-mm deep, water-filled well in a block of tissue mimicking material. Each probe was positioned below the phantom to move stones against gravity. Single propulsion bursts of 50 ms or 3 s duration were applied to three separate targets: 10 fragments of 2 different sizes (1-2 and 2-3 mm) and a single 4 × 7 mm human stone. Safety studies consisted of porcine kidneys exposed to an extreme dose of 10-minute burst duration, including a 7-day survival study and acute studies with surgically implanted stones.

RESULTS

Although successful in the clinical trial, the shorter focal beam and maximum 50 ms burst duration of the C5-2 probe moved stones, but did not expel any stones from the phantom's 30-mm deep calyx. The results were similar with the SC-50 probe under the same 50 ms burst duration. Longer (3 s) bursts available with the SC-50 probe expelled all stones at both 4.5 and 9.5 cm "skin-to-stone" depths with lower probe heating compared to the C5-2. No abnormal behavior, urine chemistry, serum chemistry, or histological findings were observed within the kidney or surrounding tissues for the 10 min burst duration used in the animal studies.

CONCLUSIONS

A longer focal beam and burst duration improved expulsion of a stone and multiple stone fragments from a phantom over a broad range of clinically relevant penetration depths and did not cause kidney injury in animal studies.

摘要

目的

在超声推进的首次人体试验中,受试者排出了用C5 - 2探头重新定位的残留结石碎片集合。在此,比较了C5 - 2探头与产生更长聚焦束和脉冲持续时间的定制(SC - 50)探头在移动多个碎片方面的有效性和安全性。

材料与方法

有效性通过从由模拟组织材料块中30毫米深、充满水的孔组成的肾盏模型中排出的结石数量来量化。每个探头置于模型下方以逆重力移动结石。对三个不同目标施加持续时间为50毫秒或3秒的单次推进脉冲:两种不同尺寸(1 - 2毫米和2 - 3毫米)的10个碎片以及一块4×7毫米的人体结石。安全性研究包括暴露于10分钟脉冲持续时间极端剂量下的猪肾,包括为期7天的存活研究以及对手术植入结石的急性研究。

结果

尽管在临床试验中取得成功,但C5 - 2探头较短的聚焦束和最长50毫秒的脉冲持续时间能移动结石,但未从模型30毫米深的肾盏中排出任何结石。在相同50毫秒脉冲持续时间下,SC - 50探头的结果类似。与C5 - 2探头相比,SC - 50探头可用的更长(3秒)脉冲在4.5厘米和9.5厘米“皮肤至结石”深度均排出了所有结石,且探头发热更低。在动物研究中使用的10分钟脉冲持续时间内,在肾脏或周围组织中未观察到异常行为、尿液化学、血清化学或组织学发现。

结论

更长的聚焦束和脉冲持续时间在广泛的临床相关穿透深度范围内改善了结石和多个结石碎片从模型中的排出,且在动物研究中未造成肾损伤。

相似文献

1
Safety and Effectiveness of a Longer Focal Beam and Burst Duration in Ultrasonic Propulsion for Repositioning Urinary Stones and Fragments.较长聚焦波束和脉冲持续时间在超声推进中用于重新定位尿路结石和碎片的安全性和有效性。
J Endourol. 2017 Aug;31(8):793-799. doi: 10.1089/end.2017.0167. Epub 2017 Jun 26.
2
Effect of Stone Size and Composition on Ultrasonic Propulsion Ex Vivo.结石大小和成分对体外超声推进的影响。
Urology. 2018 Jan;111:225-229. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2017.09.013. Epub 2017 Sep 28.
3
Focused ultrasound to expel calculi from the kidney: safety and efficacy of a clinical prototype device.聚焦超声排肾结石:临床原型设备的安全性和有效性。
J Urol. 2013 Sep;190(3):1090-5. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.03.120. Epub 2013 Apr 9.
4
Evaluation of Urinary Stone Comminution with a Clinical Burst Wave Lithotripsy System.临床脉冲式碎石系统粉碎尿路结石的评估。
J Endourol. 2020 Nov;34(11):1167-1173. doi: 10.1089/end.2019.0873. Epub 2020 Mar 20.
5
Ultrasonic propulsion of kidney stones.肾结石的超声推进
Curr Opin Urol. 2016 May;26(3):264-70. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000276.
6
Combined Burst Wave Lithotripsy and Ultrasonic Propulsion for Improved Urinary Stone Fragmentation.联合冲击波碎石术与超声推进以改善尿路结石破碎
J Endourol. 2018 Apr;32(4):344-349. doi: 10.1089/end.2017.0675. Epub 2018 Mar 20.
7
Quantitative Assessment of Effectiveness of Ultrasonic Propulsion of Kidney Stones.超声推动肾结石有效性的定量评估。
J Endourol. 2019 Oct;33(10):850-857. doi: 10.1089/end.2019.0340. Epub 2019 Sep 25.
8
Preclinical safety and effectiveness studies of ultrasonic propulsion of kidney stones.超声推动肾结石的临床前安全性和有效性研究。
Urology. 2014 Aug;84(2):484-9. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2014.04.041. Epub 2014 Jun 26.
9
Application of novel burst wave lithotripsy and ultrasonic propulsion technology for the treatment of ureteral calculi in a bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus) and renal calculi in a harbor seal (Phoca vitulina).新型冲击波碎石和超声推进技术在治疗宽吻海豚(Tursiops truncatus)输尿管结石和港海豹(Phoca vitulina)肾结石中的应用。
Urolithiasis. 2024 Jan 8;52(1):21. doi: 10.1007/s00240-023-01515-6.
10
Comparison of tissue injury from focused ultrasonic propulsion of kidney stones versus extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.聚焦超声推动肾结石与体外冲击波碎石术引起的组织损伤比较。
J Urol. 2014 Jan;191(1):235-41. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.07.087. Epub 2013 Aug 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Facilitated Clearance of Small, Asymptomatic Renal Stones With Burst Wave Lithotripsy and Ultrasonic Propulsion.利用爆破波碎石术和超声推进促进小的无症状肾结石的清除。
J Urol. 2025 Jul;214(1):41-47. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000004533. Epub 2025 Mar 17.
2
Overview of Therapeutic Ultrasound Applications and Safety Considerations: 2024 Update.治疗性超声应用概述与安全考量:2024年更新
J Ultrasound Med. 2025 Mar;44(3):381-433. doi: 10.1002/jum.16611. Epub 2024 Nov 11.
3
Randomized Controlled Trial of Ultrasonic Propulsion-Facilitated Clearance of Residual Kidney Stone Fragments vs Observation.超声推进辅助清除残余肾结石碎片与观察的随机对照试验。
J Urol. 2024 Dec;212(6):811-820. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000004186. Epub 2024 Aug 15.
4
Application of novel burst wave lithotripsy and ultrasonic propulsion technology for the treatment of ureteral calculi in a bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus) and renal calculi in a harbor seal (Phoca vitulina).新型冲击波碎石和超声推进技术在治疗宽吻海豚(Tursiops truncatus)输尿管结石和港海豹(Phoca vitulina)肾结石中的应用。
Urolithiasis. 2024 Jan 8;52(1):21. doi: 10.1007/s00240-023-01515-6.
5
Recent Advances in the Science of Burst Wave Lithotripsy and Ultrasonic Propulsion.爆波碎石术与超声推进科学的最新进展
BME Front. 2022;2022. doi: 10.34133/2022/9847952. Epub 2022 Feb 17.
6
First Series Using Ultrasonic Propulsion and Burst Wave Lithotripsy to Treat Ureteral Stones.第一系列:应用超声推动和冲击波碎石术治疗输尿管结石。
J Urol. 2022 Nov;208(5):1075-1082. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000002864. Epub 2022 Nov 1.
7
First In-Human Burst Wave Lithotripsy for Kidney Stone Comminution: Initial Two Case Studies.首例用于肾结石粉碎的人体冲击波碎石术:初步两例病例研究。
J Endourol. 2021 Apr;35(4):506-511. doi: 10.1089/end.2020.0725. Epub 2020 Nov 5.
8
Update on clinical trials of kidney stone repositioning and preclinical results of stone breaking with one system.肾结石复位临床试验及单一系统碎石的临床前结果更新
Proc Meet Acoust. 2018 Nov 5;35(1). doi: 10.1121/2.0000949. Epub 2018 Dec 21.
9
Evaluation of Urinary Stone Comminution with a Clinical Burst Wave Lithotripsy System.临床脉冲式碎石系统粉碎尿路结石的评估。
J Endourol. 2020 Nov;34(11):1167-1173. doi: 10.1089/end.2019.0873. Epub 2020 Mar 20.
10
Burst wave lithotripsy and acoustic manipulation of stones.冲击波碎石术和声波对结石的作用。
Curr Opin Urol. 2020 Mar;30(2):149-156. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000727.

本文引用的文献

1
DEVELOPING COMPLETE ULTRASONIC MANAGEMENT OF KIDNEY STONES FOR SPACEFLIGHT.开发用于太空飞行的肾结石超声综合管理方法。
J Space Saf Eng. 2016 Sep;3(2):50-57. doi: 10.1016/S2468-8967(16)30018-0. Epub 2017 Jan 25.
2
Shock formation and nonlinear saturation effects in the ultrasound field of a diagnostic curvilinear probe.诊断曲线探头超声场中的激波形成和非线性饱和效应。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2017 Apr;141(4):2327. doi: 10.1121/1.4979261.
3
Ultrasonic propulsion of kidney stones.肾结石的超声推进
Curr Opin Urol. 2016 May;26(3):264-70. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000276.
4
First in Human Clinical Trial of Ultrasonic Propulsion of Kidney Stones.肾结石超声推进的首次人体临床试验。
J Urol. 2016 Apr;195(4 Pt 1):956-64. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.10.131. Epub 2015 Oct 30.
5
Preclinical safety and effectiveness studies of ultrasonic propulsion of kidney stones.超声推动肾结石的临床前安全性和有效性研究。
Urology. 2014 Aug;84(2):484-9. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2014.04.041. Epub 2014 Jun 26.
6
Focused ultrasound to displace renal calculi: threshold for tissue injury.聚焦超声移位肾结石:组织损伤阈值
J Ther Ultrasound. 2014 Mar 31;2:5. doi: 10.1186/2050-5736-2-5. eCollection 2014.
7
Content and face validation of a curriculum for ultrasonic propulsion of calculi in a human renal model.内容和表面效度验证在人类肾脏模型中超声推进结石的课程。
J Endourol. 2014 Apr;28(4):459-63. doi: 10.1089/end.2013.0589. Epub 2014 Jan 2.
8
Comparison of tissue injury from focused ultrasonic propulsion of kidney stones versus extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.聚焦超声推动肾结石与体外冲击波碎石术引起的组织损伤比较。
J Urol. 2014 Jan;191(1):235-41. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.07.087. Epub 2013 Aug 2.
9
Focused ultrasonic propulsion of kidney stones: review and update of preclinical technology.聚焦超声推动肾结石:临床前技术的综述和更新。
J Endourol. 2013 Oct;27(10):1183-6. doi: 10.1089/end.2013.0315. Epub 2013 Sep 14.
10
Focused ultrasound to expel calculi from the kidney: safety and efficacy of a clinical prototype device.聚焦超声排肾结石:临床原型设备的安全性和有效性。
J Urol. 2013 Sep;190(3):1090-5. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.03.120. Epub 2013 Apr 9.