Kumar Raekha, Dalton Andrew R H
Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College Faculty of Medicine, London, UK
Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK.
Perspect Public Health. 2014 Nov;134(6):339-45. doi: 10.1177/1757913913493236. Epub 2013 Aug 5.
Given a North-South divide in mortality in England, we aimed to assess the extent of a North-South divide in risk factors for cardiovascular disease (CVD), controlling for markers of socio-economic position (SEP).
We undertook cross-sectional analyses using respondents from the 2006 Health Survey for England. We assessed mean systolic blood pressure, total cholesterol, body mass index (BMI) and smoking prevalence in the two regions. We built nested regression models adding demographic factors, SEP indicators, behavioural risk factors, vascular disease status and CVD preventive medications stepwise into each model. We examined interactions between region, age and gender.
Controlling for demographic variables, we found a northern excess in systolic blood pressure (+1.95mmHg (SE = 0.40)), BMI (0.40kgm(-2) (SE = 0.12)) and smoking prevalence (5.6% (SE = 1.1)). The difference in smoking prevalence was entirely abolished by markers of SEP. Systolic blood pressure and BMI differences were attenuated by SEP, behavioural and disease indicators, but remained (+1.63mmHg (SE = 0.41) and 0.25kgm(-2) (SE = 0.12), respectively). However, they were lost after adjustment for preventive medication. The North-South divide in systolic blood pressure was attributed to differences in men and younger-to-middle-aged groups. Northern respondents were more physically active, especially younger men.
English North-South differences in smoking can be explained through adverse, cross-sectional SEP. Northern excesses in blood pressure and BMI may be associated with differential clinical management. Risk factor differences may, in part, explain a previously found North-South divide in mortality. Further exploration of geographic inequalities, concentrating on the impact of healthcare, may be warranted.
鉴于英格兰存在南北死亡率差异,我们旨在评估心血管疾病(CVD)风险因素的南北差异程度,并对社会经济地位(SEP)指标进行控制。
我们使用2006年英格兰健康调查的受访者进行横断面分析。我们评估了两个地区的平均收缩压、总胆固醇、体重指数(BMI)和吸烟率。我们建立了嵌套回归模型,将人口统计学因素、SEP指标、行为风险因素、血管疾病状况和CVD预防药物逐步纳入每个模型。我们研究了地区、年龄和性别的相互作用。
在控制人口统计学变量后,我们发现北部地区的收缩压(+1.95mmHg(标准误=0.40))、BMI(0.40kg/m²(标准误=0.12))和吸烟率(5.6%(标准误=1.1))更高。SEP指标完全消除了吸烟率的差异。收缩压和BMI的差异因SEP、行为和疾病指标而减弱,但仍然存在(分别为+1.63mmHg(标准误=0.41)和0.25kg/m²(标准误=0.12))。然而,在调整预防药物后,这些差异消失了。收缩压的南北差异归因于男性和中青年群体的差异。北部受访者身体活动更多,尤其是年轻男性。
英格兰南北吸烟差异可通过不利的横断面SEP来解释。北部地区血压和BMI较高可能与不同的临床管理有关。风险因素差异可能部分解释了先前发现的南北死亡率差异。可能有必要进一步探索地理不平等,重点关注医疗保健的影响。