Hamberger Marla J, Seidel William T
Department of Neurology, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, 710 West 168th Street, Box 100, New York, New York 10032, USA.
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2009 Jul;15(4):529-35. doi: 10.1017/S1355617709090754.
Naming is generally considered a left-hemisphere function without precise localization. However, recent cortical stimulation studies demonstrate a modality-related anatomical dissociation, in that anterior temporal stimulation disrupts auditory description naming ("auditory naming") but not visual object naming ("visual naming"), whereas posterior temporal stimulation disrupts naming on both tasks. We hypothesized that patients with anterior temporal abnormalities would exhibit impaired auditory naming, yet normal range visual naming, whereas patients with posterior temporal abnormalities would exhibit impaired performance on both tasks. Thirty-four patients with documented anterior temporal abnormalities and 14 patients with documented posterior temporal abnormalities received both naming tests. As hypothesized, patients with anterior temporal abnormalities demonstrated impaired auditory naming, yet normal range visual naming performance. Patients with posterior temporal abnormalities were impaired in visual naming; however, auditory naming scores were intact. Although these group patterns were statistically significant, on an individual basis, auditory-visual naming asymmetries better predicted whether individual patients had anterior or posterior temporal abnormalities. These behavioral findings are generally consistent with stimulation results, suggesting that modality specificity is inherent in the organization of language, with predictable neuroanatomical correlates. Results also carry clinical implications regarding localizing dysfunction, identifying and characterizing naming deficits, and potentially, in treating neurologically based language disorders.
命名通常被认为是一种无精确定位的左半球功能。然而,最近的皮层刺激研究表明存在一种与模式相关的解剖学分离,即颞叶前部刺激会干扰听觉描述命名(“听觉命名”),但不影响视觉物体命名(“视觉命名”),而颞叶后部刺激会干扰这两项任务的命名。我们假设,颞叶前部异常的患者会出现听觉命名受损,但视觉命名在正常范围内,而颞叶后部异常的患者在两项任务上都会表现出受损。34名有记录的颞叶前部异常患者和14名有记录的颞叶后部异常患者接受了两项命名测试。正如所假设的,颞叶前部异常的患者表现出听觉命名受损,但视觉命名表现处于正常范围内。颞叶后部异常的患者在视觉命名方面受损;然而,听觉命名分数是完整的。虽然这些组间模式具有统计学意义,但就个体而言,听觉-视觉命名不对称性能更好地预测个体患者是否有颞叶前部或后部异常。这些行为学发现总体上与刺激结果一致,表明模式特异性在语言组织中是固有的,具有可预测的神经解剖学相关性。结果对于功能障碍的定位、识别和表征命名缺陷,以及潜在地治疗基于神经学的语言障碍也具有临床意义。