• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

匹配设计和因果图。

Matched designs and causal diagrams.

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

Int J Epidemiol. 2013 Jun;42(3):860-9. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyt083.

DOI:10.1093/ije/dyt083
PMID:23918854
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3733703/
Abstract

We use causal diagrams to illustrate the consequences of matching and the appropriate handling of matched variables in cohort and case-control studies. The matching process generally forces certain variables to be independent despite their being connected in the causal diagram, a phenomenon known as unfaithfulness. We show how causal diagrams can be used to visualize many previous results about matched studies. Cohort matching can prevent confounding by the matched variables, but censoring or other missing data and further adjustment may necessitate control of matching variables. Case-control matching generally does not prevent confounding by the matched variables, and control of matching variables may be necessary even if those were not confounders initially. Matching on variables that are affected by the exposure and the outcome, or intermediates between the exposure and the outcome, will ordinarily produce irremediable bias.

摘要

我们使用因果图来说明匹配的后果,以及在队列研究和病例对照研究中如何正确处理匹配变量。匹配过程通常会导致某些变量尽管在因果图中是相关的,但在实际上却是独立的,这种现象被称为不忠实。我们展示了如何使用因果图来可视化许多关于匹配研究的先前结果。队列匹配可以防止匹配变量引起的混杂,但删失或其他缺失数据以及进一步的调整可能需要控制匹配变量。病例对照匹配通常不能防止匹配变量引起的混杂,即使这些变量最初不是混杂因素,也可能需要控制匹配变量。在暴露和结局,或暴露和结局之间的中间变量上进行匹配,通常会产生不可挽回的偏差。

相似文献

1
Matched designs and causal diagrams.匹配设计和因果图。
Int J Epidemiol. 2013 Jun;42(3):860-9. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyt083.
2
Causal Diagrams: Pitfalls and Tips.因果图:陷阱与技巧。
J Epidemiol. 2020 Apr 5;30(4):153-162. doi: 10.2188/jea.JE20190192. Epub 2020 Feb 1.
3
Case-control matching: effects, misconceptions, and recommendations.病例对照匹配:效果、误解与建议。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2018 Jan;33(1):5-14. doi: 10.1007/s10654-017-0325-0. Epub 2017 Nov 3.
4
Longitudinal Studies 4: Matching Strategies to Evaluate Risk.纵向研究 4:匹配策略评估风险。
Methods Mol Biol. 2021;2249:167-177. doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-1138-8_9.
5
[Matching in observational research: from the directed acyclic graph perspective].[观察性研究中的匹配:从有向无环图的角度]
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2021 Apr 10;42(4):740-744. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112338-20200601-00793.
6
A simulation study on matched case-control designs in the perspective of causal diagrams.从因果图角度对匹配病例对照设计的模拟研究。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016 Aug 20;16(1):102. doi: 10.1186/s12874-016-0206-3.
7
Limitations of individual causal models, causal graphs, and ignorability assumptions, as illustrated by random confounding and design unfaithfulness.个体因果模型、因果图和可忽略性假设的局限性,如图随机混杂和设计不忠实所说明的。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2015 Oct;30(10):1101-10. doi: 10.1007/s10654-015-9995-7. Epub 2015 Feb 17.
8
Avoiding overadjustment bias in social epidemiology through appropriate covariate selection: a primer.避免社会流行病学中的过度调整偏倚:一个入门指南。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2022 Sep;149:127-136. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.05.021. Epub 2022 Jun 2.
9
Invited Commentary: Causal diagrams and measurement bias.特邀评论:因果图与测量偏倚
Am J Epidemiol. 2009 Oct 15;170(8):959-62; discussion 963-4. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwp293. Epub 2009 Sep 15.
10
Estimating effects of nursing intervention via propensity score analysis.通过倾向得分分析评估护理干预的效果。
Nurs Res. 2008 Nov-Dec;57(6):444-52. doi: 10.1097/NNR.0b013e31818c66f6.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing the impact of day programs on individuals living with dementia and their family/friend caregivers (AIDA-DemCare): protocol of a prospective cohort study combined with a qualitative evaluation.评估日间项目对痴呆症患者及其家庭/朋友照顾者的影响(AIDA-DemCare):一项结合定性评估的前瞻性队列研究方案
BMC Public Health. 2025 Aug 19;25(1):2846. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23896-6.
2
Model-based estimation of the generalized impact fraction (GIF) and population attributable fraction (PAF) for interventions targeting risk factors affecting the five-year risk of diabetic retinopathy.针对影响糖尿病视网膜病变五年风险的危险因素的干预措施,基于模型的广义影响分数(GIF)和人群归因分数(PAF)估计。
BMC Public Health. 2025 Aug 6;25(1):2667. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23955-y.
3
Unveiling health disparities: Diagnostic prevalences in a transgender cohort versus matched controls.揭示健康差异:跨性别队列与匹配对照组的诊断患病率
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 6;20(8):e0329849. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0329849. eCollection 2025.
4
Oral contraceptives with progestogens desogestrel or levonorgestrel and risk of intracranial meningioma: national case-control study.含去氧孕烯或左炔诺孕酮的口服避孕药与颅内脑膜瘤风险:全国病例对照研究
BMJ. 2025 Jun 11;389:e083981. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2024-083981.
5
Absence of nonfatal suicidal behavior preceding suicide death reveals differences in clinical risks.自杀死亡前无非致命自杀行为揭示了临床风险的差异。
Psychiatry Res. 2025 May;347:116391. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2025.116391. Epub 2025 Feb 24.
6
Increased Mortality After Lower Extremity Amputation in a Danish Nationwide Cohort: The Mediating Role of Postoperative Complications.丹麦全国队列研究中下肢截肢术后死亡率增加:术后并发症的中介作用
Clin Epidemiol. 2025 Jan 25;17:27-40. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S499167. eCollection 2025.
7
Interaction between opium use and cigarette smoking on bladder cancer: An inverse probability weighting approach based on a multicenter case-control study in Iran.阿片类药物使用与吸烟对膀胱癌的相互作用:基于伊朗一项多中心病例对照研究的逆概率加权法
Glob Epidemiol. 2024 Dec 30;9:100182. doi: 10.1016/j.gloepi.2024.100182. eCollection 2025 Jun.
8
Impact of systemic inflammation and disease activity on the incidence of interstitial lung disease in patients with rheumatoid arthritis - a nested case-control study within the German biologics register RABBIT.全身炎症和疾病活动对类风湿关节炎患者间质性肺疾病发病率的影响——德国生物制剂注册库RABBIT中的一项巢式病例对照研究
Arthritis Res Ther. 2024 Dec 5;26(1):209. doi: 10.1186/s13075-024-03449-9.
9
EXploring Patterns of Use and Effects of Adult Day Programs to Improve Trajectories of Continuing Care (EXPEDITE): Protocol for a Retrospective Cohort Study.探索成人日间活动项目使用模式和效果以改善持续护理轨迹(EXPEDITE):一项回顾性队列研究方案。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Aug 30;13:e60896. doi: 10.2196/60896.
10
Is the relationship between chronic pain and mortality causal? A propensity score analysis.慢性疼痛与死亡率之间的关系是因果关系吗?一项倾向得分分析。
Pain. 2025 Jan 1;166(1):183-195. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003336. Epub 2024 Jul 9.

本文引用的文献

1
Case-control studies: basic concepts.病例对照研究:基本概念。
Int J Epidemiol. 2012 Oct;41(5):1480-9. doi: 10.1093/ije/dys147.
2
Overadjustment bias and unnecessary adjustment in epidemiologic studies.流行病学研究中的过度调整偏倚与不必要的调整
Epidemiology. 2009 Jul;20(4):488-95. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181a819a1.
3
High-dimensional propensity score adjustment in studies of treatment effects using health care claims data.使用医疗保健理赔数据进行治疗效果研究中的高维倾向得分调整
Epidemiology. 2009 Jul;20(4):512-22. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181a663cc.
4
A structural approach to selection bias.一种针对选择偏倚的结构化方法。
Epidemiology. 2004 Sep;15(5):615-25. doi: 10.1097/01.ede.0000135174.63482.43.
5
Smoking and lung cancer: recent evidence and a discussion of some questions.吸烟与肺癌:近期证据及若干问题探讨
J Natl Cancer Inst. 1959 Jan;22(1):173-203.
6
Quantifying biases in causal models: classical confounding vs collider-stratification bias.因果模型中的偏差量化:经典混杂与对撞分层偏差
Epidemiology. 2003 May;14(3):300-6.
7
Causal diagrams for epidemiologic research.流行病学研究的因果图。
Epidemiology. 1999 Jan;10(1):37-48.
8
Absence of confounding does not correspond to collapsibility of the rate ratio or rate difference.不存在混杂并不等同于率比或率差的可压缩性。
Epidemiology. 1996 Sep;7(5):498-501.
9
Sampling strategies in nested case-control studies.巢式病例对照研究中的抽样策略。
Environ Health Perspect. 1994 Nov;102 Suppl 8(Suppl 8):47-51. doi: 10.1289/ehp.94102s847.
10
On the need for the rare disease assumption in case-control studies.病例对照研究中罕见病假设的必要性。
Am J Epidemiol. 1982 Sep;116(3):547-53. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113439.