• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关于系统监测和改善电子健康数据质量的愿景。

A vision for the systematic monitoring and improvement of the quality of electronic health data.

作者信息

Dixon Brian E, Rosenman Marc, Xia Yuni, Grannis Shaun J

机构信息

School of Informatics and Computing, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, USA.

出版信息

Stud Health Technol Inform. 2013;192:884-8.

PMID:23920685
Abstract

In parallel with the implementation of information and communications systems, health care organizations are beginning to amass large-scale repositories of clinical and administrative data. Many nations seek to leverage so-called Big Data repositories to support improvements in health outcomes, drug safety, health surveillance, and care delivery processes. An unsupported assumption is that electronic health care data are of sufficient quality to enable the varied use cases envisioned by health ministries. The reality is that many electronic health data sources are of suboptimal quality and unfit for particular uses. To more systematically define, characterize and improve electronic health data quality, we propose a novel framework for health data stewardship. The framework is adapted from prior data quality research outside of health, but it has been reshaped to apply a systems approach to data quality with an emphasis on health outcomes. The proposed framework is a beginning, not an end. We invite the biomedical informatics community to use and adapt the framework to improve health data quality and outcomes for populations in nations around the world.

摘要

在实施信息和通信系统的同时,医疗保健机构开始积累大规模的临床和管理数据存储库。许多国家试图利用所谓的大数据存储库来支持改善健康结果、药物安全、健康监测和护理提供流程。一个未经证实的假设是,电子医疗数据的质量足以满足卫生部设想的各种用例。现实情况是,许多电子健康数据源的质量欠佳,不适用于特定用途。为了更系统地定义、描述和提高电子健康数据质量,我们提出了一个新的健康数据管理框架。该框架改编自健康领域以外先前的数据质量研究,但经过重塑后采用了系统方法来处理数据质量,并强调健康结果。所提出的框架只是一个开端,而非终点。我们邀请生物医学信息学界使用并调整该框架,以提高全球各国人群的健康数据质量和健康结果。

相似文献

1
A vision for the systematic monitoring and improvement of the quality of electronic health data.关于系统监测和改善电子健康数据质量的愿景。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2013;192:884-8.
2
Integrating information from disparate sources: the Walter Reed National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Data Transfer Project.
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2008 Nov 6:1066.
3
Information assurance in biomedical informatics systems.
IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag. 2004 Jan-Feb;23(1):110-8. doi: 10.1109/memb.2004.1297181.
4
The value proposition of structured reporting in interventional radiology.介入放射学中结构化报告的价值主张。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014 Oct;203(4):734-8. doi: 10.2214/AJR.14.13112.
5
Challenges in data quality assurance for electronic health records.电子健康记录数据质量保证中的挑战。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2013;183:37-41.
6
Big data.大数据
J Am Coll Radiol. 2015 Feb;12(2):129. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2014.10.018.
7
Reliable personal health records.可靠的个人健康记录。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2008;136:484-9.
8
CER Hub: An informatics platform for conducting comparative effectiveness research using multi-institutional, heterogeneous, electronic clinical data.CER中心:一个利用多机构、异构电子临床数据进行比较效果研究的信息学平台。
Int J Med Inform. 2015 Oct;84(10):763-73. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2015.06.002. Epub 2015 Jun 10.
9
Data quality probes--a synergistic method for quality monitoring of electronic medical record data accuracy and healthcare provision.数据质量探测——一种用于电子病历数据准确性和医疗服务质量监测的协同方法。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2001;84(Pt 2):1116-9.
10
Using computerized medical databases to measure and to improve the quality of intensive care.利用计算机化医学数据库来衡量和提高重症监护质量。
J Crit Care. 2004 Dec;19(4):248-56. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2004.08.004.

引用本文的文献

1
Electronic health record data quality assessment and tools: a systematic review.电子健康记录数据质量评估及工具:系统综述。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2023 Sep 25;30(10):1730-1740. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocad120.
2
Automated Notification of Relevant Expected or Incidental Findings in Imaging Exams in a Verticalized Healthcare System.影像检查中相关预期或偶然发现的自动化通知在垂直化医疗保健系统中。
J Med Syst. 2022 Jul 5;46(8):55. doi: 10.1007/s10916-022-01842-y.
3
Using multivariate long short-term memory neural network to detect aberrant signals in health data for quality assurance.
使用多元长短期记忆神经网络检测健康数据中的异常信号,以进行质量保证。
Int J Med Inform. 2021 Mar;147:104368. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104368. Epub 2020 Dec 16.
4
Extending an open-source tool to measure data quality: case report on Observational Health Data Science and Informatics (OHDSI).扩展一个用于测量数据质量的开源工具:观察性健康数据科学与信息学(OHDSI)案例报告
BMJ Health Care Inform. 2020 Mar;27(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjhci-2019-100054.
5
Reliability of administrative data to identify sexually transmitted infections for population health: a systematic review.行政数据用于识别群体健康中性传播感染的可靠性:一项系统综述
BMJ Health Care Inform. 2019 Aug;26(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjhci-2019-100074.
6
Evaluation of Data Exchange Process for Interoperability and Impact on Electronic Laboratory Reporting Quality to a State Public Health Agency.评估用于互操作性的数据交换过程及其对向州公共卫生机构的电子实验室报告质量的影响。
Online J Public Health Inform. 2018 Sep 21;10(2):e204. doi: 10.5210/ojphi.v10i2.9317. eCollection 2018.
7
Clinical Informatics Researcher's Desiderata for the Data Content of the Next Generation Electronic Health Record.临床信息学研究者对下一代电子健康记录数据内容的需求。
Appl Clin Inform. 2017 Oct;8(4):1159-1172. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2017-06-R-0101. Epub 2017 Dec 21.
8
Data quality of electronic medical records in Manitoba: do problem lists accurately reflect chronic disease billing diagnoses?曼尼托巴省电子病历的数据质量:问题清单能否准确反映慢性病计费诊断?
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016 Nov;23(6):1107-1112. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocw013. Epub 2016 Apr 23.
9
Differences in the Prevalence of Obesity, Smoking and Alcohol in the United States Nationwide Inpatient Sample and the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System.美国全国住院病人样本与行为危险因素监测系统中肥胖、吸烟和饮酒患病率的差异。
PLoS One. 2015 Nov 4;10(11):e0140165. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0140165. eCollection 2015.
10
Leveraging health information exchange to improve population health reporting processes: lessons in using a collaborative-participatory design process.利用健康信息交换改善人群健康报告流程:采用协作式参与性设计流程的经验教训。
EGEMS (Wash DC). 2014 Oct 22;2(3):1082. doi: 10.13063/2327-9214.1082. eCollection 2014.