• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

随机卡片分类法与条件估值法中的受访者确定性:范围偏差的探索性研究

The random card sort method and respondent certainty in contingent valuation: an exploratory investigation of range bias.

作者信息

Shackley Phil, Dixon Simon

机构信息

School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.

出版信息

Health Econ. 2014 Oct;23(10):1213-23. doi: 10.1002/hec.2980. Epub 2013 Aug 6.

DOI:10.1002/hec.2980
PMID:23922327
Abstract

Willingness to pay (WTP) values derived from contingent valuation surveys are prone to a number of biases. Range bias occurs when the range of money values presented to respondents in a payment card affects their stated WTP values. This paper reports the results of an exploratory study whose aim was to investigate whether the effects of range bias can be reduced through the use of an alternative to the standard payment card method, namely, a random card sort method. The results suggest that the random card sort method is prone to range bias but that this bias may be mitigated by restricting the analysis to the WTP values of those respondents who indicate they are 'definitely sure' they would pay their stated WTP.

摘要

通过条件估值调查得出的支付意愿(WTP)值容易出现多种偏差。当支付卡中呈现给受访者的货币价值范围影响他们声明的WTP值时,就会出现范围偏差。本文报告了一项探索性研究的结果,其目的是调查是否可以通过使用标准支付卡方法的替代方法,即随机卡片排序方法,来减少范围偏差的影响。结果表明,随机卡片排序方法容易出现范围偏差,但通过将分析限制在那些表示“绝对确定”会支付其声明的WTP的受访者的WTP值上,这种偏差可能会得到缓解。

相似文献

1
The random card sort method and respondent certainty in contingent valuation: an exploratory investigation of range bias.随机卡片分类法与条件估值法中的受访者确定性:范围偏差的探索性研究
Health Econ. 2014 Oct;23(10):1213-23. doi: 10.1002/hec.2980. Epub 2013 Aug 6.
2
Framing the willingness-to-pay question: impact on response patterns and mean willingness to pay.构建支付意愿问题:对回答模式和平均支付意愿的影响
Health Econ. 2014 May;23(5):550-63. doi: 10.1002/hec.2932. Epub 2013 May 22.
3
Order bias in estimates of willingness to pay for drugs to treat attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.治疗注意力缺陷多动障碍药物支付意愿估计中的顺序偏差。
Eur J Health Econ. 2005 Jun;6(2):146-51. doi: 10.1007/s10198-004-0270-1.
4
Do divergences between stated and actual willingness to pay signify the existence of bias in contingent valuation surveys?陈述的支付意愿与实际支付意愿之间的差异是否意味着条件价值评估调查中存在偏差?
Soc Sci Med. 2005 Feb;60(3):525-36. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.05.023.
5
Willingness to pay for publicly financed health care services in Central and Eastern Europe: evidence from six countries based on a contingent valuation method.中东欧地区对公共资助医疗保健服务的支付意愿:基于条件价值评估法的六个国家的证据
Soc Sci Med. 2014 Sep;116:193-201. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.07.009. Epub 2014 Jul 5.
6
Can a Circular Payment Card Format Effectively Elicit Preferences? Evidence From a Survey on a Mandatory Health Insurance Scheme in Tunisia.循环支付卡格式能否有效引出偏好?来自突尼斯一项强制性医疗保险计划调查的证据。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2017 Jun;15(3):385-398. doi: 10.1007/s40258-016-0287-5.
7
The impact of the design of payment scales on the willingness to pay for health gains.支付量表设计对健康收益支付意愿的影响。
Eur J Health Econ. 2017 Jul;18(6):743-760. doi: 10.1007/s10198-016-0825-y. Epub 2016 Sep 13.
8
Valuing a hypothetical cure for rheumatoid arthritis using the contingent valuation methodology: the patient perspective.使用条件价值评估法评估类风湿关节炎的假设性治愈方法:患者视角
J Rheumatol. 2005 Mar;32(3):443-53.
9
Stability of Willingness to Pay: Does Time and Treatment Allocation in a Randomized Controlled Trial Influence Willingness to Pay?支付意愿的稳定性:随机对照试验中的时间和治疗分配是否会影响支付意愿?
Med Decis Making. 2024 Jul;44(5):470-480. doi: 10.1177/0272989X241249654. Epub 2024 May 13.
10
The willingness to pay for in vitro fertilization: a pilot study using contingent valuation.体外受精的支付意愿:一项使用条件价值评估法的试点研究。
Med Care. 1994 Jul;32(7):686-99. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199407000-00003.

引用本文的文献

1
Does timing matter? The role of health information shocks in measuring willingness to pay.时机重要吗?健康信息冲击在衡量支付意愿中的作用。
Eur J Health Econ. 2025 Apr 17. doi: 10.1007/s10198-025-01774-7.
2
Willingness to pay for COVID-19 vaccines: Applying the health belief model.对 COVID-19 疫苗的支付意愿:应用健康信念模型。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2023 Jan;19(1):95-101. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2022.09.003. Epub 2022 Sep 13.
3
Eliciting willingness-to-pay to prevent hospital medication administration errors in the UK: a contingent valuation survey.
在英国,通过意愿调查评估法来预防医院用药管理错误的意愿:一项条件价值评估调查。
BMJ Open. 2022 Feb 1;12(2):e053115. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053115.
4
An Examination of Consistency in the Incremental Approach to Willingness to Pay: Evidence Using Societal Values for NHS Dental Services.《递增意愿支付法一致性的检验:国民保健制度牙科服务的社会价值观证据》。
Med Decis Making. 2021 May;41(4):465-474. doi: 10.1177/0272989X21996329. Epub 2021 Mar 18.
5
Who bears the cost of forest conservation?谁来承担森林保护的费用?
PeerJ. 2018 Jul 5;6:e5106. doi: 10.7717/peerj.5106. eCollection 2018.
6
The impact of the design of payment scales on the willingness to pay for health gains.支付量表设计对健康收益支付意愿的影响。
Eur J Health Econ. 2017 Jul;18(6):743-760. doi: 10.1007/s10198-016-0825-y. Epub 2016 Sep 13.