School of Biology, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, USA.
Ecology. 2013 Jun;94(6):1347-58. doi: 10.1890/12-0389.1.
Prey traits linking consumer diversity to ecosystem function remain poorly understood. On tropical coral reefs, herbivores promote coral dominance by suppressing competing macroalgae, but the roles of herbivore identity and diversity, macroalgal defenses, and their interactions in affecting reef resilience and function are unclear. We studied adjacent pairs of no-take marine reserves and fished areas on reefs in Fiji and found that protected reefs supported 7-17x greater biomass, 2-3x higher species richness of herbivorous fishes, and 3-11x more live coral cover than did fished reefs. In contrast, macroalgae were 27-61x more abundant and 3-4x more species-rich on fished reefs. When we transplanted seven common macroalgae from fished reefs into reserves they were rapidly consumed, suggesting that rates of herbivory (ecosystem functioning) differed inside vs. outside reserves. We then video-recorded feeding activity on the same seven macroalgae when transplanted into reserves, and assessed the functional redundancy vs. complementarity of herbivorous fishes consuming these macroalgae. Of 29 species of larger herbivorous fishes on these reefs, only four species accounted for 97% of macroalgal consumption. Two unicornfish consumed a range of brown macroalgae, a parrotfish consumed multiple red algae, and a rabbitfish consumed a green alga, with almost no diet overlap among these groups. The two most chemically rich, allelopathic algae were each consumed by a single, but different, fish species. This striking complementarity resulted from herbivore species differing in their tolerances to macroalgal chemical and structural defenses. A model of assemblage diet breadth based on our feeding observations predicted that high browser diversity would be required for effective control of macroalgae on Fijian reefs. In support of this model, we observed strong negative relationships between herbivore diversity and macroalgal abundance and diversity across the six study reefs. Our findings indicate that the total diet breadth of the herbivore community and the probability of all macroalgae being removed from reefs by herbivores increases with increasing herbivore diversity, but that a few critical species drive this relationship. Therefore, interactions between algal defenses and herbivore tolerances create an essential role for consumer diversity in the functioning and resilience of coral reefs.
猎物特征将消费者多样性与生态系统功能联系起来,但人们对此仍知之甚少。在热带珊瑚礁中,食草动物通过抑制竞争的大型藻类来促进珊瑚的优势地位,但食草动物的身份和多样性、大型藻类的防御以及它们之间的相互作用如何影响珊瑚礁的恢复力和功能尚不清楚。我们研究了斐济珊瑚礁上相邻的无捕鱼区和捕鱼区,发现保护区的生物量比捕鱼区高 7-17 倍,草食性鱼类的物种丰富度高 2-3 倍,活珊瑚覆盖率高 3-11 倍。相比之下,捕鱼区的大型藻类丰富度高 27-61 倍,物种丰富度高 3-4 倍。当我们将从捕鱼区移植的七种常见大型藻类移植到保护区时,它们很快就被吃掉了,这表明保护区内外的食草动物摄食率(生态系统功能)不同。然后,我们在保护区内对同一七种大型藻类进行视频记录,并评估摄食这些藻类的草食性鱼类的功能冗余度和互补性。在这些珊瑚礁上的 29 种较大的草食性鱼类中,只有 4 种占大型藻类消耗的 97%。两种 unicornfish 消耗了一系列棕色大型藻类,一种鹦嘴鱼消耗了多种红色藻类,一种兔子鱼消耗了一种绿色藻类,这些群体之间几乎没有饮食重叠。两种最具化学活性、化感作用最强的藻类都被一种独特的鱼类消耗。这种惊人的互补性是由于食草动物在对大型藻类的化学和结构防御的耐受性上存在差异。基于我们的摄食观察,一种基于集合饮食宽度的模型预测,在斐济的珊瑚礁上,有效的大型藻类控制需要高的食草动物多样性。为了支持这一模型,我们在六个研究的珊瑚礁上观察到,草食动物多样性与大型藻类的丰度和多样性之间存在强烈的负相关关系。我们的研究结果表明,食草动物群落的总饮食宽度以及食草动物从珊瑚礁上清除所有大型藻类的可能性随着食草动物多样性的增加而增加,但少数关键物种驱动了这种关系。因此,藻类防御和食草动物耐受性之间的相互作用为消费者多样性在珊瑚礁的功能和恢复力中发挥的重要作用创造了条件。