Suppr超能文献

将情境分析锚定在卫生政策与系统研究中:对影响低收入和中等收入国家卫生委员会的情境因素的叙述性综述

Anchoring contextual analysis in health policy and systems research: A narrative review of contextual factors influencing health committees in low and middle income countries.

作者信息

George Asha, Scott Kerry, Garimella Surekha, Mondal Shinjini, Ved Rajani, Sheikh Kabir

机构信息

Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA; Public Health Foundation of India, New Delhi, India.

出版信息

Soc Sci Med. 2015 May;133:159-67. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.03.049. Epub 2015 Mar 28.

Abstract

Health committees, councils or boards (HCs) mediate between communities and health services in many health systems. Despite their widespread prevalence, HC functions vary due to their diversity and complexity, not least because of their context specific nature. We undertook a narrative review to better understand the contextual features relevant to HCs, drawing from Scopus and the internet. We found 390 English language articles from journals and grey literature since 1996 on health committees, councils and boards. After screening with inclusion and exclusion criteria, we focused on 44 articles. Through an iterative process of exploring previous attempts at understanding context in health policy and systems research (HPSR) and the HC literature, we developed a conceptual framework that delineates these contextual factors into four overlapping spheres (community, health facilities, health administration, society) with cross-cutting issues (awareness, trust, benefits, resources, legal mandates, capacity-building, the role of political parties, non-governmental organizations, markets, media, social movements and inequalities). While many attempts at describing context in HPSR result in empty arenas, generic lists or amorphous detail, we suggest anchoring an understanding of context to a conceptual framework specific to the phenomena of interest. By doing so, our review distinguishes between contextual elements that are relatively well understood and those that are not. In addition, our review found that contextual elements are dynamic and porous in nature, influencing HCs but also being influenced by them due to the permeability of HCs. While reforms focus on tangible HC inputs and outputs (training, guidelines, number of meetings held), our review of contextual factors highlights the dynamic relationships and broader structural elements that facilitate and/or hinder the role of health committees in health systems. Such an understanding of context points to its contingent and malleable nature, links it to theorizing in HPSR, and clarifies areas for investigation and action.

摘要

在许多卫生系统中,卫生委员会、理事会或董事会(以下简称“卫生委员会”)在社区与卫生服务之间发挥着调解作用。尽管卫生委员会普遍存在,但其职能因多样性和复杂性而有所不同,尤其是由于其特定的背景性质。我们进行了一项叙述性综述,以更好地了解与卫生委员会相关的背景特征,资料来源于Scopus数据库和互联网。我们发现,自1996年以来,有390篇来自期刊和灰色文献的英文文章涉及卫生委员会、理事会和董事会。在根据纳入和排除标准进行筛选后,我们重点关注了44篇文章。通过反复探索先前在卫生政策与系统研究(HPSR)及卫生委员会文献中理解背景的尝试,我们构建了一个概念框架,将这些背景因素划分为四个重叠领域(社区、卫生设施、卫生行政、社会)以及一些交叉问题(认知、信任、利益、资源、法律授权、能力建设、政党作用、非政府组织、市场、媒体、社会运动和不平等)。虽然在HPSR中许多描述背景的尝试最终得到的是空洞的领域、通用列表或无定形的细节,但我们建议将对背景的理解锚定到一个针对感兴趣现象的特定概念框架上。通过这样做,我们的综述区分了相对容易理解的背景要素和尚未被充分理解的要素。此外,我们的综述发现,背景要素本质上是动态且具有渗透性的,它们影响着卫生委员会,但由于卫生委员会的渗透性,它们也受到卫生委员会的影响。虽然改革侧重于卫生委员会的具体投入和产出(培训、指南、召开会议的次数),但我们对背景因素的综述强调了促进和/或阻碍卫生委员会在卫生系统中发挥作用的动态关系和更广泛的结构要素。这种对背景的理解指出了其偶然性和可塑性,将其与HPSR中的理论化联系起来,并明确了调查和行动的领域。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验