Li Lin, Zuo Zhili, Japuntich Daniel A, Pui David Y H
Particle Technology Laboratory, Mechanical Engineering, University of Minnesota, 111 Church Street SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
Ann Occup Hyg. 2012 Jul;56(5):581-94. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/mes034.
The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) developed a standard for respirator certification under 42 CFR Part 84, using a TSI 8130 automated filter tester with photometers. A recent study showed that photometric detection methods may not be sensitive for measuring engineered nanoparticles. Present NIOSH standards for penetration measurement are mass-based; however, the threshold limit value/permissible exposure limit for an engineered nanoparticle worker exposure is not yet clear. There is lack of standardized filter test development for engineered nanoparticles, and development of a simple nanoparticle filter test is indicated. To better understand the filter performance against engineered nanoparticles and correlations among different tests, initial penetration levels of one fiberglass and two electret filter media were measured using a series of polydisperse and monodisperse aerosol test methods at two different laboratories (University of Minnesota Particle Technology Laboratory and 3M Company). Monodisperse aerosol penetrations were measured by a TSI 8160 using NaCl particles from 20 to 300 nm. Particle penetration curves and overall penetrations were measured by scanning mobility particle sizer (SMPS), condensation particle counter (CPC), nanoparticle surface area monitor (NSAM), and TSI 8130 at two face velocities and three layer thicknesses. Results showed that reproducible, comparable filtration data were achieved between two laboratories, with proper control of test conditions and calibration procedures. For particle penetration curves, the experimental results of monodisperse testing agreed well with polydisperse SMPS measurements. The most penetrating particle sizes (MPPSs) of electret and fiberglass filter media were ~50 and 160 nm, respectively. For overall penetrations, the CPC and NSAM results of polydisperse aerosols were close to the penetration at the corresponding median particle sizes. For each filter type, power-law correlations between the penetrations measured by different instruments show that the NIOSH TSI 8130 test may be used to predict penetrations at the MPPS as well as the CPC and NSAM results with polydisperse aerosols. It is recommended to use dry air (<20% RH) as makeup air in the test system to prevent sodium chloride particle deliquescing and minimizing the challenge particle dielectric constant and to use an adequate neutralizer to fully neutralize the polydisperse challenge aerosol. For a simple nanoparticle penetration test, it is recommended to use a polydisperse aerosol challenge with a geometric mean of ~50 nm with the CPC or the NSAM as detectors.
美国国家职业安全与健康研究所(NIOSH)根据42 CFR Part 84制定了呼吸器认证标准,采用配有光度计的TSI 8130自动过滤器测试仪。最近的一项研究表明,光度检测方法对于测量工程纳米颗粒可能不够灵敏。NIOSH目前的穿透率测量标准是基于质量的;然而,工程纳米颗粒工人接触的阈限值/允许接触限值尚不清楚。缺乏针对工程纳米颗粒的标准化过滤器测试方法,因此需要开发一种简单的纳米颗粒过滤器测试方法。为了更好地了解过滤器对工程纳米颗粒的性能以及不同测试之间的相关性,在两个不同的实验室(明尼苏达大学颗粒技术实验室和3M公司)使用一系列多分散和单分散气溶胶测试方法,测量了一种玻璃纤维和两种驻极体过滤介质的初始穿透水平。使用TSI 8160测量20至300 nm的NaCl颗粒的单分散气溶胶穿透率。通过扫描迁移率颗粒大小分析仪(SMPS)、冷凝颗粒计数器(CPC)、纳米颗粒表面积监测仪(NSAM)和TSI 8130在两种面风速和三种滤层厚度下测量颗粒穿透曲线和总穿透率。结果表明,在适当控制测试条件和校准程序的情况下,两个实验室获得了可重复、可比的过滤数据。对于颗粒穿透曲线,单分散测试的实验结果与多分散SMPS测量结果吻合良好。驻极体和玻璃纤维过滤介质的最易穿透颗粒尺寸(MPPS)分别约为50 nm和160 nm。对于总穿透率,多分散气溶胶的CPC和NSAM结果接近相应中位粒径下的穿透率。对于每种过滤类型,不同仪器测量的穿透率之间的幂律相关性表明,NIOSH TSI 8130测试可用于预测MPPS下的穿透率以及多分散气溶胶的CPC和NSAM结果。建议在测试系统中使用干燥空气(<20%相对湿度)作为补充空气,以防止氯化钠颗粒潮解并最小化挑战颗粒的介电常数,并使用适当的中和器完全中和多分散挑战气溶胶。对于简单的纳米颗粒穿透测试,建议使用几何平均粒径约为50 nm的多分散气溶胶挑战,并使用CPC或NSAM作为探测器。