Durnez Joke, Moerkerke Beatrijs, Nichols Thomas E
Department of Data Analysis, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Neuroimage. 2014 Jan 1;84:45-64. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.07.072. Epub 2013 Aug 6.
When analyzing functional MRI data, several thresholding procedures are available to account for the huge number of volume units or features that are tested simultaneously. The main focus of these methods is to prevent an inflation of false positives. However, this comes with a serious decrease in power and leads to a problematic imbalance between type I and type II errors. In this paper, we show how estimating the number of activated peaks or clusters enables one to estimate post-hoc how powerful the selection procedure performs. This procedure can be used in real studies as a diagnostics tool, and raises awareness on how much activation is potentially missed. The method is evaluated and illustrated using simulations and a real data example. Our real data example illustrates the lack of power in current fMRI research.
在分析功能磁共振成像(fMRI)数据时,有几种阈值化程序可用于处理同时测试的大量体素单元或特征。这些方法的主要重点是防止假阳性的增加。然而,这伴随着功效的严重下降,并导致I型错误和II型错误之间出现问题性的不平衡。在本文中,我们展示了如何估计激活峰或簇的数量,从而能够事后估计选择程序的执行功效。该程序可在实际研究中用作诊断工具,并提高人们对潜在遗漏多少激活的认识。使用模拟和真实数据示例对该方法进行了评估和说明。我们的真实数据示例说明了当前fMRI研究中功效的不足。