Hallam Glyn P, Webb Thomas L, Sheeran Paschal, Miles Eleanor, Wilkinson Iain D, Hunter Michael D, Barker Anthony T, Woodruff Peter W R, Totterdell Peter, Lindquist Kristen A, Farrow Tom F D
SCANLab (Sheffield Cognition and Neuroimaging Laboratory), Academic Clinical Psychiatry, Department of Neuroscience, University of Sheffield, The Longley Centre, Northern General Hospital, Norwood Grange Drive, Sheffield, United Kingdom; Department of Psychology, University of York, York, United Kingdom.
Department of Psychology, University of Sheffield, Western Bank, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 23;10(3):e0119500. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0119500. eCollection 2015.
Several studies have investigated the neural basis of effortful emotion regulation (ER) but the neural basis of automatic ER has been less comprehensively explored. The present study investigated the neural basis of automatic ER supported by 'implementation intentions'. 40 healthy participants underwent fMRI while viewing emotion-eliciting images and used either a previously-taught effortful ER strategy, in the form of a goal intention (e.g., try to take a detached perspective), or a more automatic ER strategy, in the form of an implementation intention (e.g., "If I see something disgusting, then I will think these are just pixels on the screen!"), to regulate their emotional response. Whereas goal intention ER strategies were associated with activation of brain areas previously reported to be involved in effortful ER (including dorsolateral prefrontal cortex), ER strategies based on an implementation intention strategy were associated with activation of right inferior frontal gyrus and ventro-parietal cortex, which may reflect the attentional control processes automatically captured by the cue for action contained within the implementation intention. Goal intentions were also associated with less effective modulation of left amygdala, supporting the increased efficacy of ER under implementation intention instructions, which showed coupling of orbitofrontal cortex and amygdala. The findings support previous behavioural studies in suggesting that forming an implementation intention enables people to enact goal-directed responses with less effort and more efficiency.
多项研究探讨了努力情绪调节(ER)的神经基础,但自动情绪调节的神经基础尚未得到全面探索。本研究调查了由“执行意图”支持的自动情绪调节的神经基础。40名健康参与者在观看引发情绪的图像时接受功能磁共振成像(fMRI),他们采用之前所学的以目标意图形式呈现的努力情绪调节策略(例如,尝试采取超脱的视角),或以执行意图形式呈现的更自动的情绪调节策略(例如,“如果我看到恶心的东西,那么我会认为这些只是屏幕上的像素!”)来调节他们的情绪反应。目标意图情绪调节策略与先前报道的参与努力情绪调节的脑区激活相关(包括背外侧前额叶皮层),而基于执行意图策略的情绪调节策略与右下额叶回和腹侧顶叶皮层的激活相关,这可能反映了执行意图中包含的行动线索自动捕捉到的注意力控制过程。目标意图还与左侧杏仁核的调节效果较差相关,这支持了在执行意图指令下情绪调节效率的提高,执行意图指令显示眶额皮层和杏仁核之间存在耦合。这些发现支持了之前的行为学研究,表明形成执行意图能使人们以更少的努力和更高的效率做出目标导向的反应。