• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新型冠心病风险评估检测对中危患者进行进一步分类的临床实用性。

Clinical utility of a novel coronary heart disease risk-assessment test to further classify intermediate-risk patients.

机构信息

Cardiovascular Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.

出版信息

Clin Cardiol. 2013 Oct;36(10):621-7. doi: 10.1002/clc.22185. Epub 2013 Aug 8.

DOI:10.1002/clc.22185
PMID:23929798
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4231217/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Current coronary heart disease (CHD) risk assessments inadequately assess intermediate-risk patients, leaving many undertreated and vulnerable to heart attacks. A novel CHD risk-assessment (CHDRA) tool was developed for intermediate-risk stratification using biomarkers and established risk factors to significantly improve CHD risk discrimination.

HYPOTHESIS

Physicians will change their treatment plan in response to more information about a patient's CHD risk level provided by the CHDRA test.

METHODS

A Web-based survey of cardiology, internal medicine, family practice, and obstetrics/gynecology physicians (n = 206) was conducted to assess the CHDRA clinical impact. Each physician was shown 3 clinical vignettes representing community-based cohort participants randomly selected from 8 total vignettes. For each, the physicians assessed the individual's CHD risk and selected preferred therapies based on the individual's comorbidities, physical examination, and laboratory results. The individual's CHDRA score was then provided and the physicians were queried for changes to their initial treatment plans.

RESULTS

After obtaining the CHDRA result, 70% of the physician responses indicated a change to the patient's treatment plan. The revised lipid-management plans agreed more often (74.6% of the time) with the current Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines than did the original plans (57.6% of the time). Most physicians (71.3%) agreed with the statement that the CHDRA result provided information that would impact their current treatment decisions.

CONCLUSIONS

The CHDRA test provided additional information to which physicians responded by more often applying appropriate therapy and actions aligned with guidelines, thus demonstrating the clinical utility of the test.

摘要

背景

目前的冠心病(CHD)风险评估不能充分评估中危患者,导致许多患者治疗不足,容易发生心脏病发作。一种新的 CHD 风险评估(CHDRA)工具利用生物标志物和已建立的风险因素来进行中间风险分层,从而显著提高 CHD 风险的区分能力。

假说

医生会根据 CHDRA 测试提供的有关患者 CHD 风险水平的更多信息来改变其治疗计划。

方法

对心脏病学、内科、家庭实践和妇产科医生(n = 206)进行了基于网络的调查,以评估 CHDRA 的临床影响。每位医生都查看了 3 个临床病例,这些病例代表了从 8 个总病例中随机选择的社区队列参与者。对于每个病例,医生根据患者的合并症、体检和实验室结果评估个体的 CHD 风险,并根据个体的合并症选择首选疗法。然后提供个体的 CHDRA 评分,并询问医生是否改变其初始治疗计划。

结果

获得 CHDRA 结果后,70%的医生答复表明改变了患者的治疗计划。修订后的血脂管理计划与当前的成人治疗小组 III 指南更一致(74.6%的时间),而原始计划则不一致(57.6%的时间)。大多数医生(71.3%)同意这样的说法,即 CHDRA 结果提供了可能影响其当前治疗决策的信息。

结论

CHDRA 测试提供了更多的信息,医生通过更频繁地应用适当的治疗方法和与指南一致的行动来做出回应,从而证明了该测试的临床实用性。

相似文献

1
Clinical utility of a novel coronary heart disease risk-assessment test to further classify intermediate-risk patients.新型冠心病风险评估检测对中危患者进行进一步分类的临床实用性。
Clin Cardiol. 2013 Oct;36(10):621-7. doi: 10.1002/clc.22185. Epub 2013 Aug 8.
2
Lipid lowering drug therapy in patients with coronary heart disease from 24 European countries--Findings from the EUROASPIRE IV survey.来自24个欧洲国家的冠心病患者的降脂药物治疗——EUROASPIRE IV调查结果
Atherosclerosis. 2016 Mar;246:243-50. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2016.01.018. Epub 2016 Jan 13.
3
Use of global coronary heart disease risk assessment in practice: a cross-sectional survey of a sample of U.S. physicians.在实践中使用全球冠心病风险评估:对美国医生样本的横断面调查。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Jan 24;12:20. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-20.
4
Potential use of 10-year and lifetime coronary risk information for preventive cardiology prescribing decisions: a primary care physician survey.10年和终生冠心病风险信息在心血管预防用药决策中的潜在应用:一项初级保健医生调查
Arch Intern Med. 2010 Mar 8;170(5):470-7. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.525.
5
An Exploratory Study of Physician Decision-Making When Treating Uncontrolled COPD.探索性研究:医生治疗未控制 COPD 时的决策。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2024 Jun 18;19:1357-1373. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S454877. eCollection 2024.
6
Analytical performance validation of a coronary heart disease risk assessment multi-analyte proteomic test.冠心病风险评估多分析物蛋白质组学检测的分析性能验证
Expert Opin Med Diagn. 2013 Mar;7(2):127-36. doi: 10.1517/17530059.2013.753055. Epub 2012 Dec 11.
7
Coronary risk assessment among intermediate risk patients using a clinical and biomarker based algorithm developed and validated in two population cohorts.基于临床和生物标志物的算法对中危患者进行冠状动脉风险评估,该算法在两个人群队列中建立并验证。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2012 Nov;28(11):1819-30. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2012.742878.
8
Heart failure in patients with coronary heart disease: Prevalence, characteristics and guideline implementation - Results from the German EuroAspire IV cohort.冠心病患者的心力衰竭:患病率、特征及指南实施情况——德国EuroAspire IV队列研究结果
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2017 May 5;17(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s12872-017-0543-0.
9
Application of the MAT-CHDSP to assess guideline adherence and therapy goal achievement in secondary prevention of coronary heart disease after percutaneous coronary intervention.应用 MAT-CHDSP 评估经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后冠心病二级预防中的指南依从性和治疗目标达标情况。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2013 Mar;69(3):703-9. doi: 10.1007/s00228-012-1402-7. Epub 2012 Sep 19.
10
Acceptance of guideline recommendations and perceived implementation of coronary heart disease prevention among primary care physicians in five European countries: the Reassessing European Attitudes about Cardiovascular Treatment (REACT) survey.五个欧洲国家基层医疗医生对冠心病预防指南建议的接受情况及感知到的实施情况:重新评估欧洲对心血管治疗的态度(REACT)调查
Fam Pract. 2002 Dec;19(6):596-604. doi: 10.1093/fampra/19.6.596.

引用本文的文献

1
Comprehensive process model of clinical information interaction in primary care: results of a "best-fit" framework synthesis.基层医疗中临床信息交互的综合过程模型:“最佳拟合”框架综合研究结果。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018 Jun 1;25(6):746-758. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocx085.

本文引用的文献

1
Marshfield Clinic Personalized Medicine Research Project (PMRP): design, methods and recruitment for a large population-based biobank.马什菲尔德诊所个性化医学研究项目(PMRP):基于大规模人群的生物样本库的设计、方法与招募
Per Med. 2005 Mar;2(1):49-79. doi: 10.1517/17410541.2.1.49.
2
Coronary risk assessment among intermediate risk patients using a clinical and biomarker based algorithm developed and validated in two population cohorts.基于临床和生物标志物的算法对中危患者进行冠状动脉风险评估,该算法在两个人群队列中建立并验证。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2012 Nov;28(11):1819-30. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2012.742878.
3
Comparison of novel risk markers for improvement in cardiovascular risk assessment in intermediate-risk individuals.新型风险标志物在改善中危人群心血管风险评估中的比较。
JAMA. 2012 Aug 22;308(8):788-95. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.9624.
4
Barriers to cardiovascular risk prevention and management in Germany--an analysis of the EURIKA study.德国心血管疾病风险预防与管理的障碍——EURIKA研究分析
Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2012;8:177-86. doi: 10.2147/VHRM.S29915. Epub 2012 Mar 15.
5
Should the resting electrocardiogram be ordered as a routine risk assessment test in healthy asymptomatic adults?静息心电图是否应作为健康无症状成年人的常规风险评估测试?
JAMA. 2012 Apr 11;307(14):1530-1. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.441.
6
AHA/ACCF Secondary Prevention and Risk Reduction Therapy for Patients with Coronary and other Atherosclerotic Vascular Disease: 2011 update: a guideline from the American Heart Association and American College of Cardiology Foundation.美国心脏协会/美国心脏病学会基金会关于冠状动脉及其他动脉粥样硬化性血管疾病患者二级预防和风险降低治疗的指南:2011年更新版
Circulation. 2011 Nov 29;124(22):2458-73. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e318235eb4d. Epub 2011 Nov 3.
7
Projected impact of polypill use among US adults: Medication use, cardiovascular risk reduction, and side effects.美国成年人中使用复方药丸的预期影响:药物使用、心血管风险降低和副作用。
Am Heart J. 2011 Apr;161(4):719-25. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2010.12.019.
8
Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease screening in adults: American College Of Preventive Medicine position statement on preventive practice.成年人动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病筛查:美国预防医学学院关于预防实践的立场声明。
Am J Prev Med. 2011 Mar;40(3):381.e1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.11.021.
9
Forecasting the future of cardiovascular disease in the United States: a policy statement from the American Heart Association.预测美国心血管疾病的未来:美国心脏协会的政策声明。
Circulation. 2011 Mar 1;123(8):933-44. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e31820a55f5. Epub 2011 Jan 24.
10
2010 ACCF/AHA guideline for assessment of cardiovascular risk in asymptomatic adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines.2010年美国心脏病学会基金会/美国心脏协会无症状成人心血管风险评估指南:美国心脏病学会基金会/美国心脏协会实践指南工作组报告
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Dec 14;56(25):e50-103. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.09.001.