Olson J M, Boehnke M
Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor 48109.
Am J Hum Genet. 1990 Sep;47(3):470-82.
We carried out a simulation study to compare the power of eight methods for preliminary ordering of multiple genetic loci. Using linkage groups of six loci and a simple pedigree structure, we considered the effects on method performance of locus informativity, interlocus spacing, total distance along the chromosome, and sample size. Method performance was assessed using the mean rank of the true order, the proportion of replicates in which the true order was the best order, and the number of orders that needed to be considered for subsequent multipoint linkage analysis in order to include the true order with high probability. A new method which maximizes the sum of adjacent two-point maximum lod scores divided by the equivalent number of informative meioses and the previously described method which minimizes the sum of adjacent recombination fraction estimates were found to be the best overall locus-ordering methods for the situations considered, although several other methods also performed well.
我们进行了一项模拟研究,以比较八种用于多个基因座初步排序方法的效能。利用六个基因座的连锁群和简单的家系结构,我们考虑了基因座信息性、基因座间距、沿染色体的总距离以及样本量对方法性能的影响。使用真实顺序的平均秩、真实顺序为最佳顺序的重复比例以及为了以高概率包含真实顺序而在后续多点连锁分析中需要考虑的顺序数量来评估方法性能。对于所考虑的情况,一种将相邻两点最大对数优势分数之和除以信息性减数分裂等效数量最大化的新方法,以及先前描述的将相邻重组分数估计值之和最小化的方法,被发现是总体上最好的基因座排序方法,尽管其他几种方法也表现良好。