Centre de Neuroscience Cognitive, UMR 5229, CNRS, Bron, France.
Trends Cogn Sci. 2013 Sep;17(9):442-9. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2013.07.002. Epub 2013 Aug 6.
During the past decades, direct electrical stimulation (DES) has been a key method not only in determining the organization of brain networks mediating movement, language, and cognition but also in establishing many central concepts of modern neuroscience, such as the electrical nature of neural transmission, the localization of brain functions, and the homuncular arrangement of sensorimotor areas. However, recent criticisms have questioned the utility of DES and argued that data collected with this technique may be flawed and unreliable. As with every other neuroscientific method, DES does have limitations. However, existing evidence argues strongly for its validity and usefulness by demonstrating that DES produces highly specific outcomes at well-defined anatomical sites and significantly minimizes postoperative deficits in brain-damaged patients.
在过去的几十年中,直接电刺激(DES)不仅是确定介导运动、语言和认知的大脑网络组织的关键方法,也是建立现代神经科学的许多核心概念的关键方法,例如神经传递的电学性质、大脑功能的定位以及感觉运动区域的同源排列。然而,最近的批评质疑了 DES 的实用性,并认为该技术收集的数据可能存在缺陷和不可靠。与其他神经科学方法一样,DES 确实存在局限性。然而,现有的证据通过证明 DES 在明确定义的解剖部位产生高度特异性的结果,并大大减少脑损伤患者术后的缺陷,强烈证明了其有效性和有用性。