Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, 921 Assembly Street, Columbia, SC, USA.
Health Place. 2013 Sep;23:157-64. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2013.07.002. Epub 2013 Jul 16.
A large body of literature has reported differences in exposure to environments supporting either healthy (e.g. supermarkets) or unhealthy (e.g. fast food outlets) dietary choices by neighborhood characteristics. We explored the associations of both supermarkets and fast food outlets availability with neighborhood characteristics, and clustering of these two outlet types in a largely rural state. Compared to block groups without a supermarket, those with a supermarket had a significantly higher income, higher housing value, larger population with high school education and above, lower minority population and lower population living below poverty even after controlling for urbanicity and population density of census block groups. Surprisingly, a similar relationship was found for block groups with and without fast food outlets. This was due to spatial co-occurrence and clustering of fast food outlets around supermarket locations. Hence, future studies exploring the associations of food environment with diet or diet-related health outcome should concurrently examine all aspects of food environment (healthy and unhealthy).
大量文献报道了邻里特征对健康(如超市)和不健康(如快餐店)饮食选择环境暴露的影响存在差异。我们探讨了超市和快餐店供应的可及性与邻里特征的关系,以及这两种类型的销售点在一个以农村为主的州中的聚集情况。与没有超市的街区相比,有超市的街区的收入明显更高,住房价值更高,受过高中及以上教育的人口比例更大,少数民族人口比例更低,生活在贫困线以下的人口比例也更低,即使在控制了城市人口密度和街区的人口密度之后也是如此。令人惊讶的是,有和没有快餐店的街区也存在类似的关系。这是由于快餐店在超市周围的空间共存和聚集。因此,未来探索食品环境与饮食或饮食相关健康结果之间关系的研究,应该同时检查食品环境的所有方面(健康和不健康)。