• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

当前胎儿超声图像生物测量分割方法的评估与比较:一项重大挑战。

Evaluation and comparison of current fetal ultrasound image segmentation methods for biometric measurements: a grand challenge.

出版信息

IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2014 Apr;33(4):797-813. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2013.2276943. Epub 2013 Aug 6.

DOI:10.1109/TMI.2013.2276943
PMID:23934664
Abstract

This paper presents the evaluation results of the methods submitted to Challenge US: Biometric Measurements from Fetal Ultrasound Images, a segmentation challenge held at the IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging 2012. The challenge was set to compare and evaluate current fetal ultrasound image segmentation methods. It consisted of automatically segmenting fetal anatomical structures to measure standard obstetric biometric parameters, from 2D fetal ultrasound images taken on fetuses at different gestational ages (21 weeks, 28 weeks, and 33 weeks) and with varying image quality to reflect data encountered in real clinical environments. Four independent sub-challenges were proposed, according to the objects of interest measured in clinical practice: abdomen, head, femur, and whole fetus. Five teams participated in the head sub-challenge and two teams in the femur sub-challenge, including one team who tackled both. Nobody attempted the abdomen and whole fetus sub-challenges. The challenge goals were two-fold and the participants were asked to submit the segmentation results as well as the measurements derived from the segmented objects. Extensive quantitative (region-based, distance-based, and Bland-Altman measurements) and qualitative evaluation was performed to compare the results from a representative selection of current methods submitted to the challenge. Several experts (three for the head sub-challenge and two for the femur sub-challenge), with different degrees of expertise, manually delineated the objects of interest to define the ground truth used within the evaluation framework. For the head sub-challenge, several groups produced results that could be potentially used in clinical settings, with comparable performance to manual delineations. The femur sub-challenge had inferior performance to the head sub-challenge due to the fact that it is a harder segmentation problem and that the techniques presented relied more on the femur's appearance.

摘要

本文呈现了提交给挑战 US 的方法的评估结果:来自胎儿超声图像的生物特征测量,这是在 2012 年 IEEE 生物医学成像国际研讨会上举行的一个分割挑战。该挑战旨在比较和评估当前的胎儿超声图像分割方法。它包括自动分割胎儿解剖结构,以测量标准产科生物测量参数,这些参数来自在不同胎龄(21 周、28 周和 33 周)和不同图像质量下拍摄的胎儿的 2D 胎儿超声图像,以反映实际临床环境中遇到的数据。根据在临床实践中测量的感兴趣的对象,提出了四个独立的子挑战:腹部、头部、股骨和整个胎儿。有五个团队参加了头部子挑战,两个团队参加了股骨子挑战,其中一个团队同时参加了这两个挑战。没有人尝试腹部和整个胎儿子挑战。挑战的目标有两个,要求参与者提交分割结果以及从分割对象中得出的测量值。进行了广泛的定量(基于区域、基于距离和 Bland-Altman 测量)和定性评估,以比较向挑战提交的当前方法的代表性选择的结果。几位专家(三位参加头部子挑战,两位参加股骨子挑战),具有不同程度的专业知识,手动描绘了感兴趣的对象,以定义评估框架中使用的真实值。对于头部子挑战,有几个小组的结果可能在临床环境中使用,其性能与手动描绘相当。股骨子挑战的性能不如头部子挑战,因为这是一个更难的分割问题,而且提出的技术更多地依赖于股骨的外观。

相似文献

1
Evaluation and comparison of current fetal ultrasound image segmentation methods for biometric measurements: a grand challenge.当前胎儿超声图像生物测量分割方法的评估与比较:一项重大挑战。
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2014 Apr;33(4):797-813. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2013.2276943. Epub 2013 Aug 6.
2
Fetal biometry: how well can offline measurements from three-dimensional volumes substitute real-time two-dimensional measurements?胎儿生物测量:三维容积的离线测量在多大程度上可以替代实时二维测量?
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Nov;42(5):560-70. doi: 10.1002/uog.12410. Epub 2013 Oct 2.
3
Fetal biometry by an inexperienced operator using two- and three-dimensional ultrasound.经验不足的操作者使用二维和三维超声进行胎儿生物测量。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2010 May;35(5):566-71. doi: 10.1002/uog.7600.
4
Ultrasound Fetal Image Segmentation Techniques: A Review.超声胎儿图像分割技术:综述
Curr Med Imaging Rev. 2019;15(1):52-60. doi: 10.2174/1573405613666170622115527.
5
Difference of Gaussians revolved along elliptical paths for ultrasound fetal head segmentation.沿椭圆路径旋转的高斯差分用于超声胎儿头部分割。
Comput Med Imaging Graph. 2014 Dec;38(8):774-84. doi: 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2014.09.006. Epub 2014 Sep 30.
6
Automated ultrasonographic measurement of basic fetal growth parameters.自动化超声测量基本胎儿生长参数。
Ultraschall Med. 2013 Apr;34(2):137-44. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1325465. Epub 2012 Nov 5.
7
The use of three-dimensional ultrasound does not improve training in fetal biometric measurements.三维超声的使用并不能改善胎儿生物测量的培训。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2011 Sep;24(9):1173-5. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2010.545931. Epub 2011 Jan 13.
8
Optimization of Fetal Biometry With 3D Ultrasound and Image Recognition (EPICEA): protocol for a prospective cross-sectional study.三维超声与图像识别优化胎儿生物测量(EPICEA):一项前瞻性横断面研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Dec 15;9(12):e031777. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031777.
9
Fetal biometry: a comparison between experienced sonographers and automated measurements.胎儿生物测量:经验丰富的超声检查医师与自动测量之间的比较
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2009 Jan;22(1):43-50. doi: 10.1080/14767050802415736.
10
Inter-observer variability in fetal biometric measurements.胎儿生物测量的观察者间变异性。
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Feb;57(1):32-39. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2017.12.006.

引用本文的文献

1
Fetal-Net: enhancing Maternal-Fetal ultrasound interpretation through Multi-Scale convolutional neural networks and Transformers.胎儿网络:通过多尺度卷积神经网络和Transformer增强母胎超声解读
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 15;15(1):25665. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-06526-4.
2
The appearance of external genital organs and anogenital distance in male fetal cadavers.男性胎儿尸体的外生殖器外观及肛门生殖距
Anat Sci Int. 2025 Jun;100(3):310-317. doi: 10.1007/s12565-024-00819-w. Epub 2025 Jan 13.
3
D2ANet: Densely Attentional-Aware Network for First Trimester Ultrasound CRL and NT Segmentation.
D2ANet:用于孕早期超声头臀长和颈项透明层分割的密集注意力感知网络
Proc IEEE Int Symp Biomed Imaging. 2023 Apr 18;58:1-4. doi: 10.1109/ISBI53787.2023.10230727.
4
A New Quantitative Tool for the Ultrasonographic Assessment of Tendons: A Reliability and Validity Study on the Patellar Tendon.一种用于肌腱超声评估的新型定量工具:髌腱的可靠性和有效性研究
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 May 21;14(11):1067. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14111067.
5
Editorial: New technologies improve maternal and newborn safety.社论:新技术提高孕产妇和新生儿安全性。
Front Med Technol. 2024 May 30;6:1372358. doi: 10.3389/fmedt.2024.1372358. eCollection 2024.
6
Autonomous fetal morphology scan: deep learning + clustering merger - the second pair of eyes behind the doctor.自主胎儿形态扫描:深度学习+聚类合并——医生背后的第二双眼睛。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024 Apr 19;24(1):102. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02505-3.
7
Automatic Deep Learning-Based Pipeline for Automatic Delineation and Measurement of Fetal Brain Structures in Routine Mid-Trimester Ultrasound Images.基于自动深度学习的常规中期超声图像中胎儿脑结构自动勾画和测量的流水线。
Fetal Diagn Ther. 2023;50(6):480-490. doi: 10.1159/000533203. Epub 2023 Aug 11.
8
Ensemble Transfer Learning for Fetal Head Analysis: From Segmentation to Gestational Age and Weight Prediction.用于胎儿头部分析的集成迁移学习:从分割到孕周和体重预测
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Sep 15;12(9):2229. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12092229.
9
Multimodal Registration for Image-Guided EBUS Bronchoscopy.用于图像引导的超声支气管镜检查的多模态配准
J Imaging. 2022 Jul 8;8(7):189. doi: 10.3390/jimaging8070189.
10
Contributions of Artificial Intelligence Reported in Obstetrics and Gynecology Journals: Systematic Review.人工智能在妇产科期刊中的应用:系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Apr 20;24(4):e35465. doi: 10.2196/35465.