Department of Microbiology, Immunology, and Biochemistry, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee 38163.
Department of Microbiology, Immunology, and Biochemistry, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee 38163.
J Biol Chem. 2013 Sep 20;288(38):27243-27262. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M113.484386. Epub 2013 Aug 9.
Five different physiological conditions have been used interchangeably to establish the sequence of molecular events needed to achieve nitrogen-responsive down-regulation of TorC1 and its subsequent regulation of downstream reporters: nitrogen starvation, methionine sulfoximine (Msx) addition, nitrogen limitation, rapamycin addition, and leucine starvation. Therefore, we tested a specific underlying assumption upon which the interpretation of data generated by these five experimental perturbations is premised. It is that they generate physiologically equivalent outcomes with respect to TorC1, i.e. its down-regulation as reflected by TorC1 reporter responses. We tested this assumption by performing head-to-head comparisons of the requirements for each condition to achieve a common outcome for a downstream proxy of TorC1 inactivation, nuclear Gln3 localization. We demonstrate that the five conditions for down-regulating TorC1 do not elicit physiologically equivalent outcomes. Four of the methods exhibit hierarchical Sit4 and PP2A phosphatase requirements to elicit nuclear Gln3-Myc(13) localization. Rapamycin treatment required Sit4 and PP2A. Nitrogen limitation and short-term nitrogen starvation required only Sit4. G1 arrest-correlated, long-term nitrogen starvation and Msx treatment required neither PP2A nor Sit4. Starving cells of leucine or treating them with leucyl-tRNA synthetase inhibitors did not elicit nuclear Gln3-Myc(13) localization. These data indicate that the five commonly used nitrogen-related conditions of down-regulating TorC1 are not physiologically equivalent and minimally involve partially differing regulatory mechanisms. Further, identical requirements for Msx treatment and long-term nitrogen starvation raise the possibility that their effects are achieved through a common regulatory pathway with glutamine, a glutamate or glutamine metabolite level as the sensed metabolic signal.
已经交替使用了五种不同的生理条件来建立实现氮响应下调 TorC1 及其随后对下游报告基因调控所需的分子事件顺序:氮饥饿、甲硫氨酸亚砜imine(Msx)添加、氮限制、雷帕霉素添加和亮氨酸饥饿。因此,我们检验了这些五种实验干扰所基于的一个特定的基本假设。即它们在 TorC1 方面产生生理等效的结果,即 TorC1 报告基因反应所反映的其下调。我们通过对头对头比较每种条件来实现 TorC1 失活的下游替代物核 Gln3 定位的共同结果,来检验这个假设。我们证明了下调 TorC1 的五种条件不会产生生理等效的结果。其中四种方法表现出 Sit4 和 PP2A 磷酸酶的层次要求,以引起核 Gln3-Myc(13)定位。雷帕霉素处理需要 Sit4 和 PP2A。氮限制和短期氮饥饿仅需要 Sit4。G1 期阻滞相关的长期氮饥饿和 Msx 处理既不需要 PP2A 也不需要 Sit4。饥饿细胞中的亮氨酸或用亮氨酰-tRNA 合成酶抑制剂处理它们不会引起核 Gln3-Myc(13)定位。这些数据表明,下调 TorC1 的五种常用氮相关条件在生理上并不等效,并且至少涉及部分不同的调节机制。此外,Msx 处理和长期氮饥饿的相同要求提出了这样一种可能性,即它们的作用是通过谷氨酰胺、谷氨酸或谷氨酰胺代谢物水平作为感知代谢信号的共同调节途径来实现的。