Jabir Shehab
St. Andrews Centre for Plastic Surgery and Burns, Broomfield Hospital, Chelmsford, Essex CM1 7ET, UK.
Plast Surg Int. 2013;2013:515737. doi: 10.1155/2013/515737. Epub 2013 Jul 1.
Body contouring following massive weight loss is a rapidly expanding field in plastic surgery. However, healthcare payers are reluctant to fund such procedures, viewing them as purely cosmetic. This has resulted in a flurry of studies assessing quality of life (QoL) and patient satisfaction following body contouring surgery in this cohort of patients to establish an evidence base to support the idea that body contouring is as much (or even more) a functional procedure as it is cosmetic. However, the methods employed in these studies are seldom ideal, and hence the conclusions are unreliable. The gold standard to assess QoL and patient satisfaction is to use patient specific psychometrically validated patient reported outcome (PRO) measures. Developing such measures consists of a three-step process which includes a review of the current literature, qualitative patient interviews to determine what patients consider the most important, and expert opinion. This study aims to appraise the currently available literature on assessment of QoL and patient satisfaction in body contouring surgery patients. This will hopefully provide an understanding of methodological weaknesses in current studies and inform future investigators of the design of ideal instruments for assessing QoL and patient satisfaction in body contouring patients.
在大量减重后进行身体塑形是整形外科中一个迅速发展的领域。然而,医疗保健支付方不愿为这类手术提供资金,认为它们纯粹是美容性质的。这导致了一系列研究,评估这一患者群体在身体塑形手术后的生活质量(QoL)和患者满意度,以建立一个证据基础,来支持身体塑形在功能方面与美容方面同样重要(甚至更重要)这一观点。然而,这些研究中所采用的方法很少是理想的,因此得出的结论并不可靠。评估生活质量和患者满意度的金标准是使用经过心理测量学验证的、针对患者个体的患者报告结局(PRO)指标。开发这样的指标包括一个三步过程,即回顾当前文献、对患者进行定性访谈以确定患者认为最重要的因素以及征求专家意见。本研究旨在评估目前关于身体塑形手术患者生活质量评估和患者满意度的现有文献。这有望让人了解当前研究中的方法学弱点,并为未来的研究者提供信息,以设计出评估身体塑形患者生活质量和患者满意度的理想工具。