Veterinary and Agrochemical Research Centre, National Reference Laboratory (CODA-CERVA), Unit for Coordination of Veterinary Diagnostics, Epidemiology and Risk Analysis (CVD-ERA), Groeselenberg 99, B-1180 Brussels, Belgium.
Prev Vet Med. 2013 Oct 1;112(1-2):48-57. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2013.07.005. Epub 2013 Aug 12.
The aim of this study was to assess the sensitivity of the four major bluetongue surveillance components implemented in Belgium in 2007 for farmed animals and prescribed by the European Union regulation; winter serological screening, sentinel system, passive clinical surveillance, export testing. Scenario tree methodology was used to evaluate the relative sensitivity of detection and targeted approach of each component in terms of early detection and freedom of infection substantiation. Field data collected from the previous year's outbreaks in Belgium were used to determine the risk groups to be considered.
The best sensitivities at herd level, taking into account the diagnostic test sensitivity, design prevalence and the number of animals tested within a herd were obtained with the winter screening and sentinel component. The sensitivities at risk group level, taking into account the obtained herd sensitivity, effective probabilities of infection and number of herds tested were high in all components, except for the export component. Component sensitivities ranged between 0.77 and 1 for all components except for the export component with a mean value of 0.22 (0.17-0.26). In terms of early detection, the probability of detection was best using the passive clinical component or the sentinel component. Sensitivity analysis showed that the passive clinical component sensitivity was mostly affected by the diagnostic process and the number of herds sampled. The sentinel and export components sensitivity were mainly affected by the relative risk estimates whereas the winter screening component was mainly affected by the assumptions about the design prevalence.
This study revealed interesting features regarding the sensitivity of detection and early detection of infection in the different surveillance components and their risk based approach as requested by the international standards.
本研究旨在评估 2007 年在比利时实施的针对养殖动物的欧盟法规规定的四项主要蓝舌病监测组成部分(冬季血清学筛查、哨点系统、被动临床监测、出口检测)的敏感性。采用情景树方法评估了每个组成部分在早期检测和感染证实方面的检测和针对性方法的相对敏感性。使用前一年在比利时暴发的田间数据来确定要考虑的风险组。
考虑到诊断测试的敏感性、设计流行率和每个畜群内测试的动物数量,在畜群水平上获得了冬季筛查和哨点组件的最佳敏感性。在风险组水平上,考虑到获得的畜群敏感性、感染的有效概率和测试的畜群数量,所有组件(出口组件除外)的敏感性都很高。除出口组件外,所有组件的敏感性介于 0.77 至 1 之间,平均值为 0.22(0.17-0.26)。在早期检测方面,使用被动临床组件或哨点组件的检测概率最佳。敏感性分析表明,被动临床组件的敏感性主要受诊断过程和采样的畜群数量的影响。哨点和出口组件的敏感性主要受相对风险估计的影响,而冬季筛查组件的敏感性主要受设计流行率假设的影响。
本研究揭示了不同监测组成部分在检测和早期检测感染方面的敏感性以及根据国际标准要求的基于风险的方法的有趣特征。