• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Public engagement in health priority setting in low- and middle-income countries: current trends and considerations for policy.公众参与在中低收入国家的卫生重点事项设定中的作用：当前趋势及对政策的考虑。
PLoS Med. 2013 Aug;10(8):e1001495. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001495. Epub 2013 Aug 6.
2
How have systematic priority setting approaches influenced policy making? A synthesis of the current literature.系统的优先级设定方法如何影响政策制定？当前文献综述。
Health Policy. 2017 Sep;121(9):937-946. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2017.07.003. Epub 2017 Jul 12.
3
Successful priority setting in low and middle income countries: a framework for evaluation.在中低收入国家成功设定优先级：评估框架。
Health Care Anal. 2010 Jun;18(2):129-47. doi: 10.1007/s10728-009-0115-2. Epub 2009 Mar 14.
4
Aligning values and outcomes in priority-setting for health.在卫生领域的优先事项设定中协调价值观与成果。
J Glob Health. 2016 Dec;6(2):020308. doi: 10.7189/jogh.06.020308.
5
Criteria Used for Priority-Setting for Public Health Resource Allocation in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review.中低收入国家公共卫生资源分配的优先排序标准：系统评价。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2019;35(6):474-483. doi: 10.1017/S0266462319000473. Epub 2019 Jul 16.
6
International validation of quality indicators for evaluating priority setting in low income countries: process and key lessons.低收入国家评估优先事项设定的质量指标的国际验证：过程与关键经验教训
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Jun 19;17(1):418. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2360-7.
7
Deliberative engagement methods on health care priority-setting in a rural South African community.农村南非社区医疗优先事项设定的审议式参与方法。
Health Policy Plan. 2021 Sep 9;36(8):1279-1291. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czab005.
8
Priority setting in health policy in Sweden and a comparison with Norway.瑞典卫生政策中的优先事项设定以及与挪威的比较。
Health Policy. 1999 Dec;50(1-2):1-22. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8510(99)00061-5.
9
Factors affecting engagement between academic faculty and decision-makers: learnings and priorities for a school of public health.影响学术教师与决策者参与的因素：公共卫生学院的经验教训和优先事项。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 Jul 25;16(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0342-9.
10
Sexual and reproductive health: challenges for priority-setting in Ghana's health reforms.性与生殖健康：加纳卫生改革中确定优先事项面临的挑战
Health Policy Plan. 2004 Oct;19 Suppl 1:i50-i61. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czh045.

引用本文的文献

1
Practices of patient engagement in drug development: a systematic scoping review.患者参与药物研发的实践：一项系统的范围综述。
Res Involv Engagem. 2022 Jun 29;8(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s40900-022-00364-8.
2
Integrating citizen engagement into evidence-informed health policy-making in eastern Europe and central Asia: scoping study and future research priorities.将公民参与纳入东欧和中亚循证卫生决策：范围研究和未来研究重点。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2022 Jan 18;20(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s12961-021-00808-9.
3
Health priority-setting for official development assistance in low-income and middle-income countries: a Best Fit Framework Synthesis study with primary data from Ethiopia, Nigeria and Tanzania.卫生重点制定用于低收入和中等收入国家的官方发展援助：埃塞俄比亚、尼日利亚和坦桑尼亚的初步数据的最佳拟合框架综合研究。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Nov 21;21(1):2138. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-12205-6.
4
Patient-public engagement strategies for health system improvement in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic scoping review.撒哈拉以南非洲改善卫生系统的患者-公众参与策略：系统范围界定综述。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Oct 5;21(1):1047. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07085-w.
5
Deliberative engagement methods on health care priority-setting in a rural South African community.农村南非社区医疗优先事项设定的审议式参与方法。
Health Policy Plan. 2021 Sep 9;36(8):1279-1291. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czab005.
6
CHAT SA: Modification of a Public Engagement Tool for Priority Setting for a South African Rural Context.南非农村背景下优先事项设定的公众参与工具的修改。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022 Feb 1;11(2):197-209. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2020.110.
7
Health technology assessment and priority setting for universal health coverage: a qualitative study of stakeholders' capacity, needs, policy areas of demand and perspectives in Nigeria.卫生技术评估和全民健康覆盖的优先事项制定：尼日利亚利益攸关方能力、需求、政策领域需求和观点的定性研究。
Global Health. 2020 Jul 8;16(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s12992-020-00583-2.
8
The Dutch Citizen Forum on Public Reimbursement of Healthcare: A Qualitative Analysis of Opinion Change.荷兰公众医疗保健报销公民论坛：意见变化的定性分析。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022 Feb 1;11(2):118-127. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2020.81.
9
A roadmap to develop dementia research capacity and capability in Pakistan: A model for low- and middle-income countries.巴基斯坦发展痴呆症研究能力和水平的路线图：低收入和中等收入国家的一个范例
Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2019 Dec 28;5:939-952. doi: 10.1016/j.trci.2019.11.005. eCollection 2019.
10
Re-orienting health systems through a commissioning approach: finding solutions for improved consumer engagement.通过委托方法重新定位卫生系统：寻找改善消费者参与的解决方案。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2019 Jul 22;17(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s12961-019-0471-9.

本文引用的文献

1
Priority-setting institutions in health: recommendations from a center for global development working group.卫生领域的优先事项设定机构：全球发展中心工作组的建议
Glob Heart. 2012 Mar;7(1):13-34. doi: 10.1016/j.gheart.2012.01.007. Epub 2012 Apr 13.
2
Developing world: Bring order to unregulated health markets.发展中世界：整顿无监管的医疗市场。
Nature. 2012 Jul 11;487(7406):163-5. doi: 10.1038/487163a.
3
Building the community voice into planning: 25 years of methods development in social audit.将社区声音纳入规划之中：社会审计 25 年的方法发展。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 Dec 21;11 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S1. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-S2-S1.
4
Community and facility-level engagement in planning and budgeting for the government health sector--a district perspective from Kenya.社区和机构层面参与政府卫生部门规划和预算编制--肯尼亚地区视角。
Health Policy. 2011 Mar;99(3):234-43. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2010.08.027. Epub 2010 Nov 19.
5
Decentralization and health care prioritization process in Tanzania: from national rhetoric to local reality.坦桑尼亚的权力下放与医疗保健重点排序过程：从国家言论到地方现实。
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2011 Apr-Jun;26(2):e102-120. doi: 10.1002/hpm.1048. Epub 2010 Jul 5.
6
Accountable priority setting for trust in health systems--the need for research into a new approach for strengthening sustainable health action in developing countries.卫生系统信任中的可问责优先事项设定——对一种加强发展中国家可持续卫生行动的新方法进行研究的必要性。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2009 Oct 24;7:23. doi: 10.1186/1478-4505-7-23.
7
Priority setting: what constitutes success? A conceptual framework for successful priority setting.优先级设定：何为成功？成功的优先级设定概念框架。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2009 Mar 5;9:43. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-9-43.
8
Public participation in health care priority setting: A scoping review.公众参与医疗保健优先事项的设定：一项范围综述。
Health Policy. 2009 Aug;91(3):219-28. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2009.01.005. Epub 2009 Mar 3.
9
Public engagement in setting priorities in health care.公众参与医疗保健领域的优先事项设定。
CMAJ. 2008 Jul 1;179(1):15-8. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.071656.
10
An ethical analysis of international health priority-setting.国际卫生重点确定的伦理分析
Health Care Anal. 2008 Jun;16(2):145-60. doi: 10.1007/s10728-007-0065-5. Epub 2007 Aug 15.

公众参与在中低收入国家的卫生重点事项设定中的作用：当前趋势及对政策的考虑。

Public engagement in health priority setting in low- and middle-income countries: current trends and considerations for policy.

机构信息

School of Population Health, University of Queensland, Australia.

出版信息

PLoS Med. 2013 Aug;10(8):e1001495. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001495. Epub 2013 Aug 6.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001495
PMID:23940462
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3735456/
Abstract

David Hipgrave and colleagues argue that we must find more effective, equitable, feasible and affordable ways to engage the public in health priority setting in developing countries.

摘要

大卫·希普格雷夫（David Hipgrave）及其同事认为，我们必须找到更有效、更公平、更可行和更负担得起的方法，让发展中国家的公众参与到卫生重点事项的设定中。