Duke University School of Medicine and Duke Global Health Institute, Durham, NC, USA.
Health Policy. 2011 Mar;99(3):234-43. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2010.08.027. Epub 2010 Nov 19.
Health systems reform processes have increasingly recognized the essential contribution of communities to the success of health programs and development activities in general. Here we examine the experience from Kilifi district in Kenya of implementing annual health sector planning guidelines that included community participation in problem identification, priority setting, and planning. We describe challenges in the implementation of national planning guidelines, how these were met, and how they influenced final plans and budgets. The broad-based community engagement envisaged in the guidelines did not take place due to the delay in roll out of the Ministry of Health-trained community health workers. Instead, community engagement was conducted through facility management committees, though in a minority of facilities, even such committees were not involved. Some overlap was found in the priorities highlighted by facility staff, committee members and national indicators, but there were also many additional issues raised by committee members and not by other groups. The engagement of the community through committees influenced target and priority setting, but the emphasis on national health indicators left many local priorities unaddressed by the final work plans. Moreover, it appears that the final impact on budgets allocated at district and facility level was limited. The experience in Kilifi highlights the feasibility of engaging the community in the health planning process, and the challenges of ensuring that this engagement feeds into consolidated plans and future implementation.
卫生系统改革进程越来越认识到社区对卫生规划和总体发展活动成功的重要贡献。本文考察了肯尼亚基利菲地区实施年度卫生部门规划准则的经验,这些准则包括社区参与问题确定、重点设定和规划。我们描述了在实施国家规划准则方面遇到的挑战、如何应对这些挑战,以及它们如何影响最终的规划和预算。由于卫生部培训的社区卫生工作者推出延迟,准则中设想的广泛的社区参与并未实现。相反,通过设施管理委员会进行社区参与,尽管在少数设施中,甚至没有涉及这些委员会。设施工作人员、委员会成员和国家指标突出的重点有一些重叠,但委员会成员提出的许多其他问题没有被其他群体提出。通过委员会让社区参与进来影响了目标和重点的设定,但对国家卫生指标的重视使得最终的工作计划没有解决许多当地的优先事项。此外,社区参与对地区和设施层面分配的预算的最终影响似乎有限。基利菲的经验强调了让社区参与卫生规划过程的可行性,以及确保这种参与纳入综合计划和未来实施的挑战。