Umeå International School of Public Health, Umea University, Umea, Sweden.
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2011 Apr-Jun;26(2):e102-120. doi: 10.1002/hpm.1048. Epub 2010 Jul 5.
During the 1990s, Tanzania like many other developing countries adopted health sector reforms. The most common policy change under the health sector reforms has been decentralization, which involves the transfer of power and authority from the central level to local authorities. Based on the case study of Mbarali district in Tanzania, this paper uses a policy analysis approach to analyse the implementation of decentralized health care priority setting. Specifically, the paper examines the process, actors and contextual factors shaping decentralized health care priority setting processes. The analysis and conclusion are based on a review of documents, key informant interviews, focus group discussion, and notes from non-participant observation. The findings of the study indicate that local institutional contexts and power asymmetries among actors have a greater influence on the prioritization process at the local level than expected and intended. The paper underlines the essentially political character of the decentralization process and reiterates the need for policy analysts to pay attention to processes, institutional contexts, and the role of policy actors in shaping the implementation of the decentralization process at the district level.
20 世纪 90 年代,坦桑尼亚像许多其他发展中国家一样,采取了卫生部门改革。卫生部门改革中最常见的政策变化是权力下放,这涉及将权力和职权从中央一级转移到地方当局。本文以坦桑尼亚的姆巴拉利区为例,采用政策分析方法分析了分权医疗保健重点制定的实施情况。具体而言,本文审查了影响分权医疗保健重点制定过程的过程、行为者和背景因素。分析和结论基于对文件的审查、关键信息者访谈、焦点小组讨论和非参与观察的记录。研究结果表明,地方机构背景和行为者之间的权力不对称对地方一级的优先排序过程的影响比预期和预期的要大。本文强调了权力下放过程的本质上的政治性,并再次强调政策分析人员需要注意分权过程、机构背景以及政策行为者在塑造区县级分权过程实施方面的作用。