• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过委托方法重新定位卫生系统:寻找改善消费者参与的解决方案。

Re-orienting health systems through a commissioning approach: finding solutions for improved consumer engagement.

机构信息

Public Service Research Group, University of New South Wales, PO Box 7196, Canberra, BC, 2610, Australia.

出版信息

Health Res Policy Syst. 2019 Jul 22;17(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s12961-019-0471-9.

DOI:10.1186/s12961-019-0471-9
PMID:31331334
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6647255/
Abstract

As many developed health systems grapple with the reorientation of their systems to those that are commissioning led, consumer engagement has emerged as an important theme. Despite many governments asserting the importance of consumer engagement in commissioning, an evidence base is yet to be developed to support this approach. This paper identifies the challenges and gaps in the literature relating to consumer engagement and commissioning, before setting out five potential solutions to these challenges. Ultimately, consumer engagement needs clarity of purpose and any approach should be tailored to context. Effective client involvement needs time and investment. To embark on such a process without this effort can be counterproductive.

摘要

随着许多发达国家的医疗体系努力将其重新定位为以委托代理为主导的体系,消费者参与已成为一个重要主题。尽管许多政府都强调了消费者参与委托代理的重要性,但目前仍缺乏支持这种方法的证据基础。本文在提出解决这些挑战的五个潜在方案之前,确定了文献中与消费者参与和委托代理相关的挑战和差距。最终,消费者参与需要明确目的,任何方法都应根据具体情况进行调整。有效的客户参与需要时间和投资。如果没有这些努力就开始这样的过程可能会适得其反。

相似文献

1
Re-orienting health systems through a commissioning approach: finding solutions for improved consumer engagement.通过委托方法重新定位卫生系统:寻找改善消费者参与的解决方案。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2019 Jul 22;17(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s12961-019-0471-9.
2
Sustainability in health care by allocating resources effectively (SHARE) 4: exploring opportunities and methods for consumer engagement in resource allocation in a local healthcare setting.通过有效分配资源实现医疗保健的可持续性(SHARE)4:探索在当地医疗环境中让消费者参与资源分配的机会和方法。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 May 5;17(1):329. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2212-5.
3
Citizen Involvement in Tunisia.突尼斯的公民参与。
World Health Popul. 2017;17(2):16-18. doi: 10.12927/whp.2017.25156.
4
Responding to rural health needs through community participation: addressing the concerns of children and young adults.通过社区参与应对农村卫生需求:解决儿童和年轻人的关切问题。
Aust J Prim Health. 2011;17(2):125-30. doi: 10.1071/PY10050.
5
Harnessing and supporting consumer involvement in the development and implementation of Models of Care for musculoskeletal health.利用和支持消费者参与制定和实施肌肉骨骼健康护理模式。
Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2016 Jun;30(3):420-444. doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2016.09.004.
6
Re "Consumer-driven health care".关于“消费者主导的医疗保健” 。
Pharos Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Med Soc. 2008 Winter;71(1):48.
7
Realisation of a joint consumer engagement strategy in the Nepean Blue Mountains region.在蓝山山脉地区实现联合消费者参与策略。
Aust J Prim Health. 2017 Dec;23(6):531-535. doi: 10.1071/PY16103.
8
Mental health research priorities in Australia: a consumer and carer agenda.澳大利亚精神健康研究重点:以消费者和照顾者为中心的议程。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 Dec 12;16(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0395-9.
9
From rhetoric to reality: consumer engagement in 16 multi-stakeholder alliances.从言辞到现实:消费者参与16个多方利益相关者联盟的情况
Am J Manag Care. 2016 Aug;22(12 Suppl):s403-12.
10
Community Engagement in Support of Moving Toward Universal Health Coverage.社区参与支持迈向全民健康覆盖。
Health Syst Reform. 2019;5(1):66-77. doi: 10.1080/23288604.2018.1541497.

引用本文的文献

1
Mixed methods systematic review of consumer engagement in rural health practice, research, and education.农村医疗卫生实践、研究与教育中消费者参与情况的混合方法系统评价。
Health Promot Int. 2025 Jul 1;40(4). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daaf140.
2
Operationalising Patient Engagement Through the Alberta Cancer Diagnosis Initiative: Recruitment Strategies for Diverse Populations in Health System Improvement.通过艾伯塔癌症诊断计划实现患者参与:卫生系统改善中不同人群的招募策略
Health Expect. 2025 Jun;28(3):e70306. doi: 10.1111/hex.70306.
3
Experiences of commissioning services for child and adolescent mental health in England (UK): a qualitative framework analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Evidence-based restructuring of health and social care.循证重构医疗与社会保健。
PLoS Med. 2017 Nov 14;14(11):e1002426. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002426. eCollection 2017 Nov.
2
A rapid review of the impact of commissioning on service use, quality, outcomes and value for money: implications for Australian policy.对委托对服务使用、质量、结果和性价比的影响的快速回顾:对澳大利亚政策的启示
Aust J Prim Health. 2016;22(1):40-49. doi: 10.1071/PY15148.
3
Something old, something new, something borrowed, something blue? Reviewing the evidence on commissioning and health services.
英格兰(英国)儿童和青少年心理健康服务委托的经验:定性框架分析。
BMJ Open. 2024 Oct 29;14(10):e086403. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086403.
4
Evidence-informed, experience-based co-design: a novel framework integrating research evidence and lived experience in priority-setting and co-design of health services.基于证据的、经验为基础的共同设计:一种将研究证据和生活经验整合到卫生服务优先事项设定和共同设计中的新框架。
BMJ Open. 2024 Aug 8;14(8):e084620. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084620.
5
Commissioning and co-production in health and care services in the United Kingdom and Ireland: An exploratory literature review.英国和爱尔兰医疗保健服务中的委托制作与联合制作:一项探索性文献综述
Health Expect. 2024 Jun;27(3):e14053. doi: 10.1111/hex.14053.
6
Engagement of older adults in regional health innovation: The ECOTECH concept mapping project.老年人参与区域健康创新:欧洲技术生态概念映射项目。
SAGE Open Med. 2022 Jan 21;10:20503121211073333. doi: 10.1177/20503121211073333. eCollection 2022.
旧物新用,借物添彩?审视委托与医疗服务的证据。
Aust J Prim Health. 2016;22(1):9-14. doi: 10.1071/PY15037.
4
Whose voices? Patient and public involvement in clinical commissioning.谁的声音?患者及公众参与临床委托服务
Health Expect. 2017 Jun;20(3):484-494. doi: 10.1111/hex.12475. Epub 2016 Jun 29.
5
Service user involvement in mental health care: an evolutionary concept analysis.服务使用者参与精神卫生保健:一项概念演变分析
Health Expect. 2016 Apr;19(2):209-21. doi: 10.1111/hex.12353. Epub 2015 Feb 13.
6
Primary care-led commissioning and public involvement in the English National Health Service. Lessons from the past.以初级医疗为主导的委托服务及公众参与英国国民医疗服务体系。过往经验教训。
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2015 May;16(3):289-303. doi: 10.1017/S1463423614000486. Epub 2014 Dec 8.
7
Public engagement in health priority setting in low- and middle-income countries: current trends and considerations for policy.公众参与在中低收入国家的卫生重点事项设定中的作用:当前趋势及对政策的考虑。
PLoS Med. 2013 Aug;10(8):e1001495. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001495. Epub 2013 Aug 6.
8
Addressing the 'postcode lottery' in local resource allocation decisions: a framework for clinical commissioning groups.解决地方资源分配决策中的“邮编彩票”问题:临床委托小组的框架
J R Soc Med. 2013 Apr;106(4):120-3. doi: 10.1177/0141076813479192.
9
'Calling executives and clinicians to account': user involvement in commissioning cancer services.“要求管理人员和临床医生负责”:用户参与癌症服务的委托工作
Health Expect. 2015 Aug;18(4):504-15. doi: 10.1111/hex.12051. Epub 2013 Feb 18.
10
Integrating evidence-based design and experience-based approaches in healthcare service design.将循证设计与基于经验的方法整合到医疗服务设计中。
HERD. 2011 Summer;4(4):12-33. doi: 10.1177/193758671100400403.