Moriarty Sunayana, Brown Nathan, Waller Michael, Chu Kevin
Department of Emergency Medicine The Prince Charles Hospital Brisbane Australia.
Emergency and Trauma Centre Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital Brisbane Australia.
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2021 Jul 12;2(4):e12470. doi: 10.1002/emp2.12470. eCollection 2021 Aug.
The objective of this study was to determine if vehicle rollover in a motor vehicle crash is an independent predictor of major injury.
A retrospective cohort study of all patients injured in motor vehicle crashes presenting to a major trauma center between July 2012 and June 2016 was conducted. Crashes were classified into groups: non-rollover, isolated rollover (without other mechanisms of injury), or mixed-mechanism rollover (with other mechanisms of injury). Associations between rollover group, other covariates (entrapment, encapsulation, ejection, death on scene, high speed, seat belt usage, airbag deployment, trauma team activation), and major injury (injury severity score >15, major surgery, intensive care unit admission, or in-hospital death) were tested using binary logistic regression models. Vehicle rollover was categorized either as "present" or "absent" on 1 model or as either "none," "isolated," or "mixed mechanism" in the other.
In 2446 motor vehicle crashes, there were 423 rollovers (196 isolated, 227 mixed mechanisms). Compared with crashes without rollovers, the prevalence of patients with major injury was lower in crashes with isolated rollovers and higher in crashes with mixed-mechanism rollovers (13.8% vs 9.5% vs 27.5%, respectively; < 0.001). Rollover (present vs absent) was not an independent predictor of major injury (odds ratio [OR], 1.10; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.78-1.53). Patients in crashes with mixed-mechanism but not isolated rollovers had increased odds (OR, 2.04; 95% CI, 1.41-2.96) of major injury compared with patients from crashes without rollovers.
Patients from crashes with isolated vehicle rollovers may not need to be transported to a trauma center as they carry a lower risk of injury.
本研究的目的是确定机动车碰撞事故中的车辆翻滚是否为重伤的独立预测因素。
对2012年7月至2016年6月期间在一家大型创伤中心就诊的所有机动车碰撞事故受伤患者进行了一项回顾性队列研究。碰撞事故分为以下几组:非翻滚事故、单纯翻滚事故(无其他致伤机制)或混合机制翻滚事故(有其他致伤机制)。使用二元逻辑回归模型检验翻滚事故组、其他协变量(被困、被包裹、弹出、现场死亡、高速行驶、安全带使用情况、安全气囊展开、创伤团队启动)与重伤(损伤严重度评分>15、大手术、入住重症监护病房或院内死亡)之间的关联。在一个模型中,车辆翻滚被分类为“存在”或“不存在”,在另一个模型中则被分类为“无”、“单纯”或“混合机制”。
在2446起机动车碰撞事故中,有423起翻滚事故(196起单纯翻滚事故,227起混合机制翻滚事故)。与无翻滚事故相比,单纯翻滚事故中重伤患者的患病率较低,而混合机制翻滚事故中重伤患者的患病率较高(分别为13.8%对9.5%对27.5%;<0.001)。翻滚事故(存在对不存在)不是重伤的独立预测因素(比值比[OR],1.10;95%置信区间[CI],0.78 - 1.53)。与无翻滚事故的患者相比,混合机制但非单纯翻滚事故中的患者重伤几率增加(OR,2.04;95%CI,1.41 - 2.96)。
单纯车辆翻滚事故中的患者可能无需被送往创伤中心,因为他们的受伤风险较低。