University of Vermont College of Medicine, Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Burlington, VT, USA.
The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Department of Orthopaedics, Providence, RI, USA.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014 Feb;23(2):236-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2013.05.011. Epub 2013 Aug 12.
Total excision of the clavicle is rarely performed. No previous study has documented long-term outcomes with objective measurements of strength, motion, and patient-centered outcomes. We present the long-term consequences of total claviculectomy on shoulder girdle function, global upper extremity function, and overall general health.
Five total claviculectomy patients were evaluated at 2 time points (2005 and 2010, mean 4.8 and 9.4 years postoperatively) by use of the DASH, SF-36, Simple Shoulder Test, ASES, UCLA, HSS, and Constant shoulder scores. Isokinetic strength, clinical range of motion, and kinematic analysis were performed on each limb pair.
All clinical scores allowing side-to-side comparison were poorer for the aclaviculate side, with significance reached for 2005 ASES scores and 2010 ASES, UCLA, HSS, and Constant scores. DASH scores and SF-36 scores were not significantly inferior to age- and sex-matched population norms. Deficits in strength were present in the aclaviculate limbs, with significance reached for adduction in 2005 and for forward flexion and external rotation in 2010. Kinematic and clinical range of motion analysis revealed scapular dyskinesis and significant deficits in external rotation in the aclaviculate limb.
We found that the clavicle contributes to the strength, coordinated scapulohumeral rhythm, and overall range of motion of the shoulder girdle. Patients compensate for loss of the clavicle with minimal functional deficit. With time, patients gradually lose some compensatory ability as evidenced by deteriorating limb-specific, patient-centered outcome measures, diminished strength in certain planes of shoulder motion, and scapular dyskinesis at long-term follow-up. Despite objective deficits, these patients continue to have normal self-perceptions of overall health and global upper extremity function.
锁骨整块切除很少见。既往研究没有对其长期结果进行过评估,包括通过客观测量的力量、运动和患者为中心的结果。我们提出了锁骨整块切除对肩带功能、上肢整体功能和整体健康的长期影响。
5 例锁骨整块切除患者在 2 个时间点(2005 年和 2010 年,术后平均 4.8 年和 9.4 年)进行评估,使用 DASH、SF-36、简易肩部测试、ASES、UCLA、HSS 和 Constant 肩部评分。对每侧肢体进行等速力量、临床活动范围和运动学分析。
所有允许侧比的临床评分在无锁骨侧更差,2005 年 ASES 评分和 2010 年 ASES、UCLA、HSS 和 Constant 评分有显著差异。DASH 评分和 SF-36 评分与年龄和性别匹配的人群正常值无显著差异。无锁骨侧的力量有缺陷,2005 年外展和 2010 年前屈和外旋有显著差异。运动学和临床活动范围分析显示肩胛骨运动障碍和无锁骨侧外旋明显缺陷。
我们发现锁骨对肩带的力量、协调的肩肱节律和整体活动范围有贡献。患者通过最小的功能缺陷来补偿锁骨的丧失。随着时间的推移,患者逐渐失去一些代偿能力,表现为肢体特异性、患者为中心的结果测量恶化,某些肩运动平面的力量减弱,以及长期随访时肩胛骨运动障碍。尽管存在客观缺陷,但这些患者对整体健康和上肢整体功能的自我认知仍正常。