Department of Psychiatry, Regional Mental Health Care, The University of Western Ontario, 850 Highbury Avenue, London, ON, N6A 4H1, Canada.
Community Ment Health J. 2014 May;50(4):388-94. doi: 10.1007/s10597-013-9612-8. Epub 2013 Aug 13.
This pilot study evaluated the experience of people with co-occurring disorders (mental illness and addiction) in relation to peer-led and professional-led group interventions. The study used a qualitative (phenomenological) approach to evaluate the experience of a convenience sample of 6 individuals with co-occurring disorders who participated in up to 8 sessions each of both peer-led and professional-led group interventions (with a similar rate of attendance in both groups). The semi-structured interview data were coded and thematically analyzed. We found 5 themes within and across the 2 interventions. In both groups, participants experienced a positive environment and personal growth, and learned, albeit different things. They were more comfortable in the peer-led group and acquired more knowledge and skills in the professional-led group. Offering both peer-led and professional-led group interventions to people with co-occurring disorders may be better than offering either alone.
本试点研究评估了同时患有精神疾病和成瘾障碍的人群在参与同伴主导和专业人员主导的小组干预时的体验。该研究采用定性（现象学）方法，对 6 名同时患有精神疾病和成瘾障碍的方便样本的体验进行评估，他们分别参加了最多 8 次同伴主导和专业人员主导的小组干预（两组的出勤率相似）。对半结构化访谈数据进行了编码和主题分析。我们在这两种干预措施中发现了 5 个主题。在两组中，参与者都体验到了积极的环境和个人成长，并且都有所收获，尽管收获的内容不同。他们在同伴主导的小组中感到更自在，在专业人员主导的小组中获得了更多的知识和技能。为同时患有精神疾病和成瘾障碍的人群提供同伴主导和专业人员主导的小组干预可能比单独提供其中一种干预更好。
