Price Richard W, Peterson Julia, Fuchs Dietmar, Angel Thomas E, Zetterberg Henrik, Hagberg Lars, Spudich Serena, Smith Richard D, Jacobs Jon M, Brown Joseph N, Gisslen Magnus
Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco General Hospital, Bldg 1 Room 101, Potrero Avenue, Box 0870 1001, San Francisco, CA, 94110, USA,
J Neuroimmune Pharmacol. 2013 Dec;8(5):1147-58. doi: 10.1007/s11481-013-9491-3. Epub 2013 Aug 13.
Central nervous system (CNS) infection is a nearly universal facet of systemic HIV infection that varies in character and neurological consequences. While clinical staging and neuropsychological test performance have been helpful in evaluating patients, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers present a valuable and objective approach to more accurate diagnosis, assessment of treatment effects and understanding of evolving pathobiology. We review some lessons from our recent experience with CSF biomarker studies. We have used two approaches to biomarker analysis: targeted, hypothesis-driven and non-targeted exploratory discovery methods. We illustrate the first with data from a cross-sectional study of defined subject groups across the spectrum of systemic and CNS disease progression and the second with a longitudinal study of the CSF proteome in subjects initiating antiretroviral treatment. Both approaches can be useful and, indeed, complementary. The first is helpful in assessing known or hypothesized biomarkers while the second can identify novel biomarkers and point to broad interactions in pathogenesis. Common to both is the need for well-defined samples and subjects that span a spectrum of biological activity and biomarker concentrations. Previously-defined guide biomarkers of CNS infection, inflammation and neural injury are useful in categorizing samples for analysis and providing critical biological context for biomarker discovery studies. CSF biomarkers represent an underutilized but valuable approach to understanding the interactions of HIV and the CNS and to more objective diagnosis and assessment of disease activity. Both hypothesis-based and discovery methods can be useful in advancing the definition and use of these biomarkers.
中枢神经系统(CNS)感染是系统性HIV感染几乎普遍存在的一个方面,其特征和神经学后果各不相同。虽然临床分期和神经心理学测试表现有助于评估患者,但脑脊液(CSF)生物标志物为更准确的诊断、治疗效果评估以及对不断演变的病理生物学的理解提供了一种有价值的客观方法。我们回顾了近期脑脊液生物标志物研究的一些经验教训。我们采用了两种生物标志物分析方法:靶向的、基于假设的方法和非靶向的探索性发现方法。我们通过一项对系统性和中枢神经系统疾病进展范围内特定受试者群体的横断面研究数据来说明第一种方法,通过一项对开始抗逆转录病毒治疗的受试者脑脊液蛋白质组的纵向研究来说明第二种方法。这两种方法都可能有用,而且实际上是互补的。第一种方法有助于评估已知或假设的生物标志物,而第二种方法可以识别新的生物标志物,并指出发病机制中的广泛相互作用。两者的共同之处在于都需要定义明确的样本和涵盖一系列生物活性和生物标志物浓度的受试者。先前定义的中枢神经系统感染、炎症和神经损伤的指导生物标志物有助于对样本进行分类分析,并为生物标志物发现研究提供关键的生物学背景。脑脊液生物标志物是一种未得到充分利用但很有价值的方法,有助于理解HIV与中枢神经系统的相互作用,并更客观地诊断和评估疾病活动。基于假设的方法和发现方法都有助于推进这些生物标志物的定义和应用。