Knowles D M, Jakobiec F A, McNally L, Burke J S
Department of Pathology, Edward S. Harkness Eye Institute, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY 10032.
Hum Pathol. 1990 Sep;21(9):959-73. doi: 10.1016/0046-8177(90)90181-4.
We performed a prospective multiparametric correlative clinical, histopathologic, and immunologic analysis of 117 ocular adnexal lymphoid proliferations developing in 108 patients between October 1977 and July 1987. The ocular adnexal lymphoid proliferations were distributed among the 108 patients as follows: orbit 69 (64%), conjunctiva 30 (28%), and eyelids nine (8%). The 117 ocular adnexal lymphoid proliferations were classified as follows: polyclonal lymphoid hyperplasia, 32 (22 orbit, nine conjunctiva, one eyelid) (27%); monoclonal B cell lymphoma, 81 (48 orbit, 25 conjunctiva, eight eyelid) (69%); null cell lymphoma, one (orbit) (1%); and histologically indeterminate, three (one each: orbit, conjunctiva, eyelid) (3%). Patients presenting with ocular adnexal polyclonal lymphoid hyperplasia and monoclonal B cell lymphoma, and patients developing unilateral and bilateral ocular adnexal lymphoid proliferations did not differ significantly with respect to age, sex, presenting complaints, duration of symptoms, or ophthalmic findings. Classifying ocular adnexal lymphoid proliferations into benign and malignant categories by histopathologic criteria and into polyclonal and monoclonal B cell categories by immunophenotypic criteria was not useful in predicting eventual outcome, including the occurrence of extraocular lymphoma. However, the clinicopathologic characteristics did differ according to the anatomic site of involvement and histopathology of the ocular adnexal lymphoid proliferations. Lymphoid infiltrates of the conjunctiva were associated with a lower incidence of extra-ocular lymphoma (20%) than were those of the orbit and eyelid, 35% and 67%, respectively (statistically significant, P less than .03). Ocular adnexal small lymphocytic and intermediate lymphocytic lymphomas were less often associated with extra-ocular lymphoma than were ocular adnexal lymphomas of all other histologic types, 27% and 46%, respectively (P less than .09). However, the single most important and statistically significant prognostic factor in these patients was the extent of disease at the time of presentation with an ocular adnexal lymphoid proliferation (P less than .001). Eighty-six percent of patients presenting with a unilateral or bilateral clinical stage lE ocular adnexal lymphoid proliferation, regardless of the histopathology or the immunophenotype, had a benign indolent clinical course and failed to develop ocular or extra-ocular lymphoma during a median follow-up period of 51 months. The results of this study substantially improve our understanding of extranodal small lymphocytic proliferations in general, and those of the ocular adnexa in particular.
1977年10月至1987年7月期间,我们对108例患者发生的117例眼附属器淋巴组织增生进行了前瞻性多参数相关临床、组织病理学和免疫学分析。108例患者的眼附属器淋巴组织增生分布如下:眼眶69例(64%),结膜30例(28%),眼睑9例(8%)。117例眼附属器淋巴组织增生分类如下:多克隆性淋巴组织增生32例(22例眼眶、9例结膜、1例眼睑)(27%);单克隆B细胞淋巴瘤81例(48例眼眶、25例结膜、8例眼睑)(69%);无细胞淋巴瘤1例(眼眶)(1%);组织学上无法确定的3例(眼眶、结膜、眼睑各1例)(3%)。表现为眼附属器多克隆性淋巴组织增生和单克隆B细胞淋巴瘤的患者,以及发生单侧和双侧眼附属器淋巴组织增生的患者,在年龄、性别、就诊主诉、症状持续时间或眼科检查结果方面无显著差异。根据组织病理学标准将眼附属器淋巴组织增生分为良性和恶性类别,以及根据免疫表型标准分为多克隆和单克隆B细胞类别,对于预测最终结局(包括眼外淋巴瘤的发生)并无帮助。然而,临床病理特征确实因眼附属器淋巴组织增生的受累解剖部位和组织病理学而异。结膜的淋巴细胞浸润发生眼外淋巴瘤的发生率(20%)低于眼眶和眼睑,分别为35%和67%(具有统计学意义,P<0.03)。眼附属器小淋巴细胞淋巴瘤和中等淋巴细胞淋巴瘤发生眼外淋巴瘤的频率低于所有其他组织学类型的眼附属器淋巴瘤,分别为27%和46%(P<0.09)。然而,这些患者中唯一最重要且具有统计学意义的预后因素是出现眼附属器淋巴组织增生时的疾病范围(P<0.001)。86%表现为单侧或双侧临床I期眼附属器淋巴组织增生的患者,无论其组织病理学或免疫表型如何,临床病程均为良性且惰性,在中位随访期51个月期间未发生眼内或眼外淋巴瘤。本研究结果极大地增进了我们对一般结外小淋巴细胞增生,尤其是眼附属器结外小淋巴细胞增生的理解。