Discipline of Paediatrics, School of Paediatrics and Reproductive Health, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Aug 15;13:313. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-313.
Healthcare provider spontaneous reporting of suspected adverse events following immunisation (AEFI) is central to monitoring post-licensure vaccine safety, but little is known about how healthcare professionals recognise and report to surveillance systems. The aim of this study was explore the knowledge, experience and attitudes of medical and nursing professionals towards detecting and reporting AEFI.
We conducted a qualitative study, using semi-structured, face to face interviews with 13 Paediatric Emergency Department consultants from a tertiary paediatric hospital, 10 General Practitioners, 2 local council immunisation and 4 General Practice nurses, recruited using purposive sampling in Adelaide, South Australia, between December 2010 and September 2011. We identified emergent themes related to previous experience of an AEFI in practice, awareness and experience of AEFI reporting, factors that would facilitate or impede reporting and previous training in vaccine safety. Thematic analysis was used to analyse the data.
AEFI reporting was infrequent across all groups, despite most participants having reviewed an AEFI. We found confusion about how to report an AEFI and variability, according to the provider group, as to the type of events that would constitute a reportable AEFI. Participants' interpretation of a "serious" or "unexpected" AEFI varied across the three groups. Common barriers to reporting included time constraints and unsatisfactory reporting processes. Nurses were more likely to have received formal training in vaccine safety and reporting than medical practitioners.
This study provides an overview of experience and beliefs of three healthcare professional groups in relation to identifying and reporting AEFI. The qualitative assessment reveals differences in experience and awareness of AEFI reporting across the three professional groups. Most participants appreciated the importance of their role in AEFI surveillance and monitoring the ongoing safety of vaccines. Future initiatives to improve education, such as increased training to health care providers, particularly, medical professionals, are required and should be included in both undergraduate curricula and ongoing, professional development.
医疗保健提供者自发报告疑似疫苗接种后不良反应(AEFI)是监测疫苗上市后安全性的核心,但对于医疗保健专业人员如何识别和向监测系统报告知之甚少。本研究旨在探讨医学和护理专业人员对检测和报告 AEFI 的知识、经验和态度。
我们进行了一项定性研究,使用半结构式面对面访谈,于 2010 年 12 月至 2011 年 9 月在南澳大利亚阿德莱德,从一家三级儿科医院招募了 13 名儿科急诊部顾问、10 名全科医生、2 名地方议会免疫接种人员和 4 名全科护士。我们确定了与实践中 AEFI 相关的先前经验、AEFI 报告的意识和经验、促进或阻碍报告的因素以及疫苗安全性方面的先前培训的主题。使用主题分析来分析数据。
尽管大多数参与者都审查了 AEFI,但所有组的 AEFI 报告都很少。我们发现,关于如何报告 AEFI 存在混淆,并且根据提供者群体的不同,构成报告 AEFI 的事件类型也存在差异。参与者对“严重”或“意外”AEFI 的解释在三组之间存在差异。报告的常见障碍包括时间限制和不尽人意的报告流程。护士比医疗从业者更有可能接受疫苗安全和报告方面的正式培训。
本研究概述了三组医疗保健专业人员在识别和报告 AEFI 方面的经验和信念。定性评估揭示了三个专业群体在 AEFI 报告方面的经验和意识差异。大多数参与者认识到他们在 AEFI 监测中的作用以及监测疫苗持续安全性的重要性。未来需要采取措施来提高教育,例如增加对医疗保健提供者的培训,特别是对医疗专业人员的培训,应包括在本科课程和持续的专业发展中。