Department of Psychology, University of California-San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093-0109, USA.
Mem Cognit. 2013 May;41(4):481-9. doi: 10.3758/s13421-012-0281-6.
Online social networking is vastly popular and permits its members to post their thoughts as microblogs, an opportunity that people exploit, on Facebook alone, over 30 million times an hour. Such trivial ephemera, one might think, should vanish quickly from memory; conversely, they may comprise the sort of information that our memories are tuned to recognize, if that which we readily generate, we also readily store. In the first two experiments, participants' memory for Facebook posts was found to be strikingly stronger than their memory for human faces or sentences from books-a magnitude comparable to the difference in memory strength between amnesics and healthy controls. The second experiment suggested that this difference is not due to Facebook posts spontaneously generating social elaboration, because memory for posts is enhanced as much by adding social elaboration as is memory for book sentences. Our final experiment, using headlines, sentences, and reader comments from articles, suggested that the remarkable memory for microblogs is also not due to their completeness or simply their topic, but may be a more general phenomenon of their being the largely spontaneous and natural emanations of the human mind.
在线社交网络非常流行,允许其成员发布微博客形式的想法,仅在 Facebook 上,人们每小时就会利用这个机会发布超过 3000 万次。人们可能认为,这种琐碎的瞬间应该很快从记忆中消失;相反,如果我们很容易生成的东西,我们也很容易存储,那么它们可能包含我们的记忆被调整以识别的信息类型。在前两个实验中,发现参与者对 Facebook 帖子的记忆明显强于他们对人脸或书本句子的记忆——这种记忆强度的差异与健忘症患者和健康对照组的差异相当。第二个实验表明,这种差异不是因为 Facebook 帖子自发地产生了社会阐述,因为添加社会阐述对帖子的记忆增强与对书本句子的记忆增强一样多。我们的最后一个实验使用了文章的标题、句子和读者评论,表明对微博客的惊人记忆也不是因为它们的完整性或仅仅是它们的主题,而是可能是一个更普遍的现象,即它们是人类思想的自发和自然流露。