• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Implementation of an educational intervention to improve hand washing in primary schools: process evaluation within a randomised controlled trial.实施教育干预以改善小学的洗手习惯:一项随机对照试验中的过程评估。
BMC Public Health. 2013 Aug 15;13:757. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-757.
2
Emotional literacy programme in special schools for children with a learning disability in England: the ZF-SEND feasibility RCT.英国针对学习障碍儿童的特殊学校中的情感素养计划:ZF-SEND可行性随机对照试验
Public Health Res (Southampt). 2024 Dec;12(15):1-105. doi: 10.3310/JTJY8001.
3
Process evaluation of a sport-for-health intervention to prevent smoking amongst primary school children: SmokeFree Sports.一项预防小学生吸烟的健康运动干预措施(无烟运动)的过程评估。
BMC Public Health. 2015 Apr 10;15:347. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1645-1.
4
The Social and Emotional Education and Development intervention to address wellbeing in primary school age children: the SEED cluster RCT.旨在解决小学适龄儿童幸福感问题的社会情感教育与发展干预措施:SEED整群随机对照试验
Public Health Res (Southampt). 2024 Jun;12(6):1-173. doi: 10.3310/LYRQ5047.
5
Effective implementation of primary school-based healthy lifestyle programmes: a qualitative study of views of school staff.有效实施基于小学的健康生活方式计划:学校工作人员观点的定性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Sep 9;19(1):1239. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7550-2.
6
Process Evaluation of a Secondary School-Based Digital Behaviour Change Intervention to Improve Toothbrushing: The BRIGHT Randomised Controlled Trial.一项基于中学的改善刷牙行为的数字行为改变干预措施的过程评估:BRIGHT随机对照试验。
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2025 Apr;53(2):180-189. doi: 10.1111/cdoe.13019. Epub 2024 Nov 25.
7
A randomised controlled implementation trial of the feasibility and effectiveness of school staff delivery of a selective substance use and mental health program during the COVID-19 pandemic.一项关于学校工作人员在新冠疫情期间开展选择性物质使用和心理健康项目的可行性与有效性的随机对照实施试验。
BMC Public Health. 2025 Jan 28;25(1):349. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-21493-1.
8
The West Midlands ActiVe lifestyle and healthy Eating in School children (WAVES) study: a cluster randomised controlled trial testing the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a multifaceted obesity prevention intervention programme targeted at children aged 6-7 years.西米德兰兹地区积极生活方式与儿童在校健康饮食研究(WAVES):一项针对 6-7 岁儿童的多方面肥胖预防干预计划的临床有效性和成本效益的集群随机对照试验。
Health Technol Assess. 2018 Feb;22(8):1-608. doi: 10.3310/hta22080.
9
Impact of regular soap provision to primary schools on hand washing and E. coli hand contamination among pupils in Nyanza Province, Kenya: a cluster-randomized trial.肯尼亚尼亚萨省向小学供应常规肥皂对学生洗手习惯和大肠杆菌手部污染的影响:一项整群随机试验。
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2013 Oct;89(4):698-708. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.12-0387. Epub 2013 Aug 12.
10
Initiating change locally in bullying and aggression through the school environment (INCLUSIVE): a pilot randomised controlled trial.通过学校环境在欺凌和攻击行为方面进行局部变革(包容性):一项试点随机对照试验。
Health Technol Assess. 2015 Jul;19(53):1-109, vii-viii. doi: 10.3310/hta19530.

引用本文的文献

1
A Quasi-Experimental Pre-Post Assessment of Hand Hygiene Practices and Hand Dirtiness Following a School-Based Educational Campaign.一项基于学校的教育活动后手卫生习惯和手部清洁程度的准实验前后评估。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 Jul 31;22(8):1198. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22081198.
2
A clinical trial evaluation of handwashing products and educational resources to improve hand hygiene in paediatric patients and school children.一种用于改善儿科患者和学童手部卫生的洗手产品和教育资源的临床试验评估。
Front Public Health. 2024 Sep 23;12:1427749. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1427749. eCollection 2024.
3
Determinants of handwashing behaviour among primary school teachers in a district of Ghana.加纳某地区小学教师洗手行为的决定因素
Health Psychol Behav Med. 2023 Mar 15;11(1):2185620. doi: 10.1080/21642850.2023.2185620. eCollection 2023.
4
Knowledge about Hand Hygiene and Related Infectious Disease Awareness among Primary School Children in Germany.德国小学生对手部卫生及相关传染病的认知情况
Children (Basel). 2022 Feb 2;9(2):190. doi: 10.3390/children9020190.
5
Availability and factors influencing community level handwashing facility in Ethiopia: Implication for prevention of infectious diseases.埃塞俄比亚社区级洗手设施的供应情况及其影响因素:对传染病预防的启示。
PLoS One. 2021 Jan 19;16(1):e0243228. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243228. eCollection 2021.
6
Improving young children's handwashing behaviour and understanding of germs: The impact of A Germ's Journey educational resources in schools and public spaces.改善幼儿的洗手行为和对细菌的理解:在学校和公共场所使用 A Germ's Journey 教育资源的效果。
PLoS One. 2020 Nov 23;15(11):e0242134. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242134. eCollection 2020.
7
Reported handwashing practices of Vietnamese people during the COVID-19 pandemic and associated factors: a 2020 online survey.越南人在COVID-19大流行期间的洗手习惯及相关因素:一项2020年在线调查。
AIMS Public Health. 2020 Aug 27;7(3):650-663. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2020051. eCollection 2020.
8
Effectiveness and Efficiency of Persuasive Space Graphics (PSG) in Motivating UK Primary School Children's Hand Hygiene.劝导性空间图形(PSG)在激励英国小学生手部卫生习惯方面的效果和效率。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 31;17(7):2351. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17072351.
9
Effectiveness of comprehensive hand hygiene module on preschool children in Klang Valley, Malaysia.马来西亚巴生谷针对学龄前儿童的综合手部卫生模块的有效性
Clin Exp Pediatr. 2020 Mar;63(3):115-116. doi: 10.3345/cep.2019.01277. Epub 2020 Feb 5.
10
Variation in the operationalisation of dose in implementation of health promotion interventions: insights and recommendations from a scoping review.在实施健康促进干预措施时,剂量实施的变化:来自范围综述的见解和建议。
Implement Sci. 2019 Jun 6;14(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s13012-019-0899-x.

本文引用的文献

1
Using a systematic conceptual model for a process evaluation of a middle school obesity risk-reduction nutrition curriculum intervention: choice, control & change.运用系统概念模型对中学肥胖风险降低营养课程干预的过程进行评估:选择、控制和改变。
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2013 Mar;45(2):126-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2012.07.002. Epub 2013 Jan 12.
2
Factors influencing hand washing behaviour in primary schools: process evaluation within a randomized controlled trial.影响小学洗手行为的因素:一项随机对照试验中的过程评估。
Health Educ Res. 2012 Dec;27(6):1055-68. doi: 10.1093/her/cys061. Epub 2012 May 22.
3
Assessing the impact of a school-based water treatment, hygiene and sanitation programme on pupil absence in Nyanza Province, Kenya: a cluster-randomized trial.评估肯尼亚尼亚萨省基于学校的水处理、个人卫生和环境卫生方案对学生缺课的影响:一项整群随机试验。
Trop Med Int Health. 2012 Mar;17(3):380-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2011.02927.x. Epub 2011 Dec 18.
4
Effects of hand hygiene campaigns on incidence of laboratory-confirmed influenza and absenteeism in schoolchildren, Cairo, Egypt.埃及开罗的手部卫生运动对在校儿童实验室确诊流感发病率和缺勤率的影响。
Emerg Infect Dis. 2011 Apr;17(4):619-25. doi: 10.3201/eid1704.101353.
5
Using process evaluation for program improvement in dose, fidelity and reach: the ACT trial experience.利用过程评估提高剂量、保真度和覆盖面:ACT 试验经验。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2009 Nov 30;6:79. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-6-79.
6
Schools for health, education and development: a call for action.健康、教育与发展学校:行动呼吁
Health Promot Int. 2009 Mar;24(1):68-77. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dan037. Epub 2008 Nov 27.
7
Process evaluation results from a school- and community-linked intervention: the Trial of Activity for Adolescent Girls (TAAG).一项学校与社区联动干预措施的过程评估结果:少女活动试验(TAAG)。
Health Educ Res. 2008 Dec;23(6):976-86. doi: 10.1093/her/cyn029. Epub 2008 Jun 16.
8
Implementation matters: a review of research on the influence of implementation on program outcomes and the factors affecting implementation.实施至关重要:关于实施对项目成果的影响以及影响实施的因素的研究综述。
Am J Community Psychol. 2008 Jun;41(3-4):327-50. doi: 10.1007/s10464-008-9165-0.
9
Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses: systematic review.中断或减少呼吸道病毒传播的物理干预措施:系统评价
BMJ. 2008 Jan 12;336(7635):77-80. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39393.510347.BE. Epub 2007 Nov 27.
10
Methodological and ethical issues in conducting qualitative research with children and young people: a literature review.针对儿童和青少年开展定性研究时的方法学与伦理问题:一项文献综述
Int J Nurs Stud. 2007 Sep;44(7):1250-60. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2006.08.015. Epub 2006 Oct 9.

实施教育干预以改善小学的洗手习惯:一项随机对照试验中的过程评估。

Implementation of an educational intervention to improve hand washing in primary schools: process evaluation within a randomised controlled trial.

机构信息

School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol BS8 2PS, United Kingdom.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2013 Aug 15;13:757. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-757.

DOI:10.1186/1471-2458-13-757
PMID:23947388
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3751660/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Process evaluations are useful for understanding how interventions are implemented in trial settings. This is important for interpreting main trial results and indicating how the intervention might function beyond the trial. The purpose of this study was to examine the reach, dose, fidelity, acceptability, and sustainability of the implementation of an educational hand washing intervention in primary schools, and to explore views regarding acceptability and sustainability of the intervention.

METHODS

Process evaluation within a cluster randomised controlled trial, including focus groups with pupils aged 6 to 11, semi-structured interviews with teachers and external staff who coordinated the intervention delivery, and school reports and direct observations of the intervention delivery.

RESULTS

The educational package was delivered in 61.4% of schools (85.2% of intervention schools, 37.8% of control schools following completion of the trial). Teachers and pupils reacted positively to the intervention, although concerns were raised about the age-appropriateness of the resources. Teachers adapted the resources to suit their school setting and pupils. Staff coordinating the intervention delivery had limited capacity to follow up and respond to schools.

CONCLUSIONS

The hand washing intervention was acceptable to schools, but its reach outside of a randomised trial, evidenced in the low proportion of schools in the control arm who received it after the trial had ended, suggests that the model of delivery may not be sustainable.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ISRCTN: ISRCTN93576146.

摘要

背景

过程评估对于了解干预措施在试验环境中的实施情况非常有用。这对于解释主要试验结果并表明干预措施在试验之外的运作方式很重要。本研究的目的是检验在小学实施教育性洗手干预措施的范围、剂量、保真度、可接受性和可持续性,并探讨对干预措施的可接受性和可持续性的看法。

方法

在一项集群随机对照试验中进行过程评估,包括对 6 至 11 岁的学生进行焦点小组讨论、对教师和协调干预措施实施的外部工作人员进行半结构化访谈,以及对学校报告和干预措施实施的直接观察。

结果

教育套餐在 61.4%的学校中得到了实施(干预学校为 85.2%,试验结束后控制学校为 37.8%)。教师和学生对干预措施反应积极,尽管对资源的适宜性提出了担忧。教师根据学校环境调整了资源。协调干预措施实施的工作人员跟进和回应学校的能力有限。

结论

洗手干预措施受到学校的欢迎,但在试验结束后,只有低比例的控制组学校接受了该干预措施,这表明其实施模式可能不可持续。

试验注册

ISRCTN:ISRCTN93576146。