School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol BS8 2PS, United Kingdom.
BMC Public Health. 2013 Aug 15;13:757. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-757.
Process evaluations are useful for understanding how interventions are implemented in trial settings. This is important for interpreting main trial results and indicating how the intervention might function beyond the trial. The purpose of this study was to examine the reach, dose, fidelity, acceptability, and sustainability of the implementation of an educational hand washing intervention in primary schools, and to explore views regarding acceptability and sustainability of the intervention.
Process evaluation within a cluster randomised controlled trial, including focus groups with pupils aged 6 to 11, semi-structured interviews with teachers and external staff who coordinated the intervention delivery, and school reports and direct observations of the intervention delivery.
The educational package was delivered in 61.4% of schools (85.2% of intervention schools, 37.8% of control schools following completion of the trial). Teachers and pupils reacted positively to the intervention, although concerns were raised about the age-appropriateness of the resources. Teachers adapted the resources to suit their school setting and pupils. Staff coordinating the intervention delivery had limited capacity to follow up and respond to schools.
The hand washing intervention was acceptable to schools, but its reach outside of a randomised trial, evidenced in the low proportion of schools in the control arm who received it after the trial had ended, suggests that the model of delivery may not be sustainable.
ISRCTN: ISRCTN93576146.
过程评估对于了解干预措施在试验环境中的实施情况非常有用。这对于解释主要试验结果并表明干预措施在试验之外的运作方式很重要。本研究的目的是检验在小学实施教育性洗手干预措施的范围、剂量、保真度、可接受性和可持续性,并探讨对干预措施的可接受性和可持续性的看法。
在一项集群随机对照试验中进行过程评估,包括对 6 至 11 岁的学生进行焦点小组讨论、对教师和协调干预措施实施的外部工作人员进行半结构化访谈,以及对学校报告和干预措施实施的直接观察。
教育套餐在 61.4%的学校中得到了实施(干预学校为 85.2%,试验结束后控制学校为 37.8%)。教师和学生对干预措施反应积极,尽管对资源的适宜性提出了担忧。教师根据学校环境调整了资源。协调干预措施实施的工作人员跟进和回应学校的能力有限。
洗手干预措施受到学校的欢迎,但在试验结束后,只有低比例的控制组学校接受了该干预措施,这表明其实施模式可能不可持续。
ISRCTN:ISRCTN93576146。