Department of Psychology, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70803, USA.
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2013 Sep;74(5):720-6. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2013.74.720.
Given that the majority of college cannabis use occurs in social situations, descriptive norms (beliefs about others' use) and injunctive norms (others' approval of risky use) may be particularly relevant to cannabis-related behaviors. Yet, little research has examined the unique impact of these norms on one's own behaviors when accounting for the variance attributable to other relevant cognitive factors. The current study is the first known investigation of the unique impact of social norms, cannabis use motives, and cannabis effect expectancies on cannabis use.
Data came from 223 (64.1% female) current cannabis-using undergraduates who completed an online questionnaire in exchange for psychology-course research credit.
Descriptive norms regarding friends (not students in general) and injunctive norms (friends and parents) were related to cannabis use frequency. Descriptive norms (friends, not students in general) and injunctive norms (friends, not parents) were related to cannabis problems. Relevant norms, expectancies, and motives accounted for 66.8% of the variance in cannabis use frequency and 28.7% of the variance in cannabis problems. In multivariate analyses, descriptive norms (friends) accounted for the greatest amount of unique variance in cannabis use frequency, whereas coping motives accounted for the greatest amount of unique variance in cannabis-related problems.
Descriptive norms (friends) and coping motives may be two cognitive vulnerability factors that could be particularly important targets for interventions.
鉴于大多数大学生的大麻使用发生在社交场合,描述性规范(关于他人使用的信念)和禁令性规范(他人对冒险使用的认可)可能与大麻相关行为特别相关。然而,很少有研究在考虑到其他相关认知因素的差异时,考察这些规范对自身行为的独特影响。本研究是首次已知的对社交规范、大麻使用动机和大麻效应期望对大麻使用的独特影响的调查。
数据来自 223 名(64.1%为女性)目前正在使用大麻的本科生,他们在线完成了一份问卷,以换取心理学课程的研究学分。
关于朋友(不是一般学生)的描述性规范和关于朋友和父母的禁令性规范与大麻使用频率有关。关于朋友(不是一般学生)的描述性规范和关于朋友(不是父母)的禁令性规范与大麻问题有关。相关规范、期望和动机解释了大麻使用频率的 66.8%和大麻问题的 28.7%的方差。在多元分析中,描述性规范(朋友)解释了大麻使用频率方差的最大部分,而应对动机解释了大麻相关问题方差的最大部分。
描述性规范(朋友)和应对动机可能是两个认知脆弱性因素,可能是干预的特别重要的目标。