Department of Psychology, Bond University, Gold Coast, Qld 4229, Australia.
Addict Behav. 2013 Nov;38(11):2741-50. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2013.07.002. Epub 2013 Jul 27.
Indices of mood, mood regulation expectancies and everyday executive functioning were examined in adult current smokers and never-smokers of both genders in Australia (N = 97), where anti-smoking campaigns have dramatically reduced smoking prevalence and acceptability, and in China (N = 222), where smoking prevalence and public acceptance of smoking remain high. Dependent measures included the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS-21), the Negative Mood Regulation (NMR) expectancies scale, the Frontal Systems Behavior Scale (FrSBe), the Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence (FTND) and the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT). Multivariate analyses of covariance (MANCOVAs) controlling for demographic and recruitment related variables revealed highly significant differences between current smokers and never-smokers in both countries such that smokers indicated worse moods and poorer functioning than never-smokers on all dependent measures. Chinese smokers scored significantly worse on all dependent measures than Australian smokers whereas Chinese and Australian never-smokers did not differ on any of the same measures. Although nicotine dependence level as measured by FTND was significantly higher in Chinese than Australian smokers and was significantly correlated with all other dependent measures, inclusion of FTND scores as another covariate in MANCOVA did not eliminate the highly significant differences between Chinese and Australian smokers. Results are interpreted in light of the relative ease of taking up and continuing smoking in China compared to Australia today.
在澳大利亚(N=97)和中国(N=222),对男性和女性的成年当前吸烟者和从不吸烟者进行了情绪、情绪调节期望和日常执行功能的研究。在澳大利亚,反吸烟运动极大地降低了吸烟率和可接受性;而在中国,吸烟率和公众对吸烟的接受程度仍然很高。依赖措施包括抑郁焦虑压力量表(DASS-21)、负性情绪调节(NMR)期望量表、额叶系统行为量表(FrSBe)、尼古丁依赖测试(FTND)和酒精使用障碍识别测试(AUDIT)。控制人口统计学和招募相关变量的多元协方差分析(MANCOVA)显示,当前吸烟者和从不吸烟者之间存在非常显著的差异,即吸烟者在所有依赖措施上的情绪和功能都比从不吸烟者差。中国吸烟者在所有依赖措施上的得分都明显低于澳大利亚吸烟者,而中国和澳大利亚的从不吸烟者在相同的措施上没有差异。虽然中国吸烟者的尼古丁依赖程度(FTND)明显高于澳大利亚吸烟者,并且与所有其他依赖措施显著相关,但将 FTND 分数作为另一个协变量纳入 MANCOVA 并不能消除中国和澳大利亚吸烟者之间的显著差异。结果解释考虑了与今天的澳大利亚相比,在中国吸烟的相对容易性和持续吸烟的问题。