Amsterdam Institute for Global Health and Development (AIGHD), Department of Global Health, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
PLoS One. 2013 Aug 12;8(8):e64345. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0064345. eCollection 2013.
Treatment outcomes of HIV patients receiving antiretroviral therapy (ART) in Rwanda are scarcely documented. HIV viral load (VL) and HIV drug-resistance (HIVDR) outcomes at month 12 were determined in a prospective cohort study of antiretroviral-naïve HIV patients initiating first-line therapy in Kigali. Treatment response was monitored clinically and by regular CD4 counts and targeted HIV viral load (VL) to confirm drug failure. VL measurements and HIVDR genotyping were performed retrospectively on baseline and month 12 samples. One hundred and fifty-eight participants who completed their month 12 follow-up visit had VL data available at month 12. Most of them (88%) were virologically suppressed (VL≤1000 copies/mL) but 18 had virological failure (11%), which is in the range of WHO-suggested targets for HIVDR prevention. If only CD4 criteria had been used to classify treatment response, 26% of the participants would have been misclassified as treatment failure. Pre-therapy HIVDR was documented in 4 of 109 participants (3.6%) with an HIVDR genotyping results at baseline. Eight of 12 participants (66.7%) with virological failure and HIVDR genotyping results at month 12 were found to harbor mutation(s), mostly NNRTI resistance mutations, whereas 4 patients had no HIVDR mutations. Almost half (44%) of the participants initiated ART at CD4 count ≤200 cell/µl and severe CD4 depletion at baseline (<50 cells/µl) was associated with virological treatment failure (p = 0.008). Although the findings may not be generalizable to all HIV patients in Rwanda, our data suggest that first-line ART regimen changes are currently not warranted. However, the accumulation of acquired HIVDR mutations in some participants underscores the need to reinforce HIVDR prevention strategies, such as increasing the availability and appropriate use of VL testing to monitor ART response, ensuring high quality adherence counseling, and promoting earlier identification of HIV patients and enrollment into HIV care and treatment programs.
卢旺达接受抗逆转录病毒疗法 (ART) 的艾滋病毒患者的治疗结果鲜有记录。在基加利对开始一线治疗的抗逆转录病毒初治艾滋病毒患者进行了一项前瞻性队列研究,确定了在第 12 个月的艾滋病毒病毒载量 (VL) 和艾滋病毒耐药性 (HIVDR) 结果。通过定期的 CD4 计数和靶向 HIV 病毒载量 (VL) 监测临床和治疗反应,以确认药物失败。对基线和第 12 个月的样本进行了 VL 测量和 HIVDR 基因分型的回顾性分析。完成第 12 个月随访的 158 名参与者有第 12 个月的 VL 数据。他们中的大多数 (88%) 病毒学上受到抑制 (VL≤1000 拷贝/ml),但有 18 人发生病毒学失败 (11%),这在世界卫生组织建议的 HIVDR 预防目标范围内。如果仅使用 CD4 标准来分类治疗反应,26%的参与者将被错误地归类为治疗失败。在基线时进行了 109 名参与者中的 4 名 (3.6%) 的治疗前 HIVDR 记录,并且在第 12 个月时对 HIVDR 基因分型结果进行了记录。在 12 名发生病毒学失败和 HIVDR 基因分型结果的参与者中,有 8 名 (66.7%) 携带突变,主要是 NNRTI 耐药突变,而 4 名患者没有 HIVDR 突变。近一半 (44%)的参与者在 CD4 计数≤200 个细胞/µl 时开始接受 ART,并且基线时严重的 CD4 细胞耗竭(<50 个细胞/µl)与病毒学治疗失败相关 (p=0.008)。尽管这些发现可能不适用于卢旺达的所有艾滋病毒患者,但我们的数据表明,目前不需要更改一线 ART 方案。然而,一些参与者中获得的 HIVDR 突变的积累强调需要加强 HIVDR 预防策略,例如增加 VL 检测的可用性和适当使用,以监测 ART 反应,确保高质量的依从性咨询,并促进早期识别艾滋病毒患者,并将其纳入艾滋病毒护理和治疗计划。