• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

流体动力和超声冲洗系统体外抗菌效果比较

Comparative antibacterial efficacies of hydrodynamic and ultrasonic irrigation systems in vitro.

作者信息

Cachovan Georg, Schiffner Ulrich, Altenhof Saskia, Guentsch Arndt, Pfister Wolfgang, Eick Sigrun

机构信息

Department of Restorative and Preventive Dentistry, Center for Dental and Oral Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

出版信息

J Endod. 2013 Sep;39(9):1171-5. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.06.008.

DOI:10.1016/j.joen.2013.06.008
PMID:23953293
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

To ensure root canal treatment success, endodontic microbiota should be efficiently reduced. The in vitro bactericidal effects of a hydrodynamic system and a passive ultrasonic irrigation system were compared.

METHODS

Single-rooted extracted teeth (n = 250) were contaminated with suspensions of Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 29212, mixed aerobic cultures, or mixed anaerobic cultures. First, the antibacterial effects of the hydrodynamic system (RinsEndo), a passive ultrasonic irrigation system (Piezo smart), and manual rinsing with 0.9% NaCl (the control) were compared. Colony-forming units were counted. Second, the 2 systems were used with 1.5% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) alone or NaOCl + 0.2% chlorhexidine (CHX). The colony-forming units in the treated and untreated roots were determined during a period of 5 days.

RESULTS

Both irrigation systems reduced bacterial numbers more effectively than manual rinsing (P < .001). With NaCl, ultrasonic activated irrigation reduced bacterial counts significantly better than hydrodynamic irrigation (P = .042). The NaOCl + CHX combination was more effective than NaOCl alone for both systems (P < .001), but hydrodynamic irrigation was more effective with NaOCl + CHX than the passive ultrasonic irrigation system.

CONCLUSIONS

Both irrigation systems, when combined with NaOCl + CHX, removed bacteria from root canals.

摘要

引言

为确保根管治疗成功,应有效减少牙髓微生物群。比较了水力系统和被动超声冲洗系统的体外杀菌效果。

方法

将单根离体牙(n = 250)用粪肠球菌ATCC 29212悬液、混合需氧培养物或混合厌氧培养物污染。首先,比较了水力系统(RinsEndo)、被动超声冲洗系统(Piezo smart)和用0.9%氯化钠手动冲洗(对照)的抗菌效果。计算菌落形成单位。其次,将这两种系统与单独的1.5%次氯酸钠(NaOCl)或NaOCl + 0.2%氯己定(CHX)一起使用。在5天的时间内测定处理过和未处理过的根管中的菌落形成单位。

结果

两种冲洗系统比手动冲洗更有效地减少了细菌数量(P <.001)。使用氯化钠时,超声激活冲洗比水力冲洗显著更好地减少了细菌数量(P =.042)。对于两种系统,NaOCl + CHX组合比单独使用NaOCl更有效(P <.001),但在使用NaOCl + CHX时,水力冲洗比被动超声冲洗系统更有效。

结论

两种冲洗系统与NaOCl + CHX联合使用时,均能从根管中清除细菌。

相似文献

1
Comparative antibacterial efficacies of hydrodynamic and ultrasonic irrigation systems in vitro.流体动力和超声冲洗系统体外抗菌效果比较
J Endod. 2013 Sep;39(9):1171-5. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.06.008.
2
Disinfecting oval-shaped root canals: effectiveness of different supplementary approaches.消毒椭圆形根管:不同补充方法的效果。
J Endod. 2011 Apr;37(4):496-501. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2010.12.008. Epub 2011 Feb 25.
3
Comparative evaluation of calcium hypochlorite and sodium hypochlorite associated with passive ultrasonic irrigation on antimicrobial activity of a root canal system infected with Enterococcus faecalis: an in vitro study.次氯酸钙和次氯酸钠联合被动超声冲洗对粪肠球菌感染根管系统抗菌活性的比较评价:一项体外研究
J Endod. 2014 Dec;40(12):1953-7. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2014.08.025. Epub 2014 Oct 1.
4
Effectiveness of Different Disinfection Protocols on the Reduction of Bacteria in Enterococcus faecalis Biofilm in Teeth with Large Root Canals.不同消毒方案对大根管牙齿中粪肠球菌生物膜内细菌减少的有效性
J Endod. 2016 Mar;42(3):460-4. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2015.12.016. Epub 2016 Jan 29.
5
Antibacterial Efficacy of a New Sonic Irrigation Device for Root Canal Disinfection.一种新型根管消毒超声冲洗装置的抗菌效果
J Endod. 2016 Dec;42(12):1799-1803. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2016.08.024. Epub 2016 Oct 22.
6
Disinfecting Effects of Rotary Instrumentation with Either 2.5% Sodium Hypochlorite or 2% Chlorhexidine as the Main Irrigant: A Randomized Clinical Study.以2.5%次氯酸钠或2%氯己定为主要冲洗液的旋转器械消毒效果:一项随机临床研究
J Endod. 2016 Jun;42(6):943-7. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2016.03.019. Epub 2016 Apr 30.
7
Efficacy of passive ultrasonic irrigation with natural irrigants (Morinda citrifolia juice, Aloe Vera and Propolis) in comparison with 1% sodium hypochlorite for removal of E. faecalis biofilm: an in vitro study.天然冲洗剂(巴戟天果汁、芦荟和蜂胶)被动超声冲洗与1%次氯酸钠去除粪肠球菌生物膜效果的比较:一项体外研究。
Indian J Dent Res. 2013 Jan-Feb;24(1):35-41. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.114938.
8
Comparison of the antibacterial effect and smear layer removal using photon-initiated photoacoustic streaming aided irrigation versus a conventional irrigation in single-rooted canals: an in vitro study.单根根管中光子引发光声流辅助冲洗与传统冲洗的抗菌效果及玷污层去除比较:一项体外研究
Photomed Laser Surg. 2013 Aug;31(8):371-7. doi: 10.1089/pho.2013.3515. Epub 2013 Jul 17.
9
Effect of smear layer against disinfection protocols on Enterococcus faecalis-infected dentin.玷污层对粪肠球菌感染牙本质消毒方案的影响。
J Endod. 2013 Nov;39(11):1395-400. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.05.007. Epub 2013 Aug 31.
10
The effectiveness of passive ultrasonic irrigation on intraradicular Enterococcus faecalis biofilms in extracted single-rooted human teeth.被动超声冲洗对离体人单根牙根管内粪肠球菌生物膜的作用。
Int Endod J. 2010 Mar;43(3):241-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2009.01672.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploiting the power of stepwise intraoperative irrigant activation to maximize oval canal disinfection: an ex-vivo investigation.利用术中逐步激活冲洗液的力量以最大化椭圆管消毒:一项体外研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Jul 5;25(1):1113. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06493-2.
2
The ability of different diffusing enhancers to deliver chlorhexidine into dentinal tubules: An evaluation.不同扩散增强剂将氯己定输送至牙本质小管的能力:一项评估。
J Dent Sci. 2024 Oct;19(4):2226-2235. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2024.02.027. Epub 2024 Mar 6.
3
Irrigants and irrigation activation systems in Endodontics.
牙髓病学中的冲洗剂和冲洗激活系统。
Braz Dent J. 2023 Jul-Aug;34(4):1-33. doi: 10.1590/0103-6440202305577.
4
Effectiveness of continuous chelation irrigation protocol in endodontics: a scoping review of laboratory studies.牙髓病学中连续螯合冲洗方案的有效性:实验室研究的范围综述。
Odontology. 2024 Jan;112(1):1-18. doi: 10.1007/s10266-023-00835-8. Epub 2023 Jul 11.
5
Antimicrobial effectiveness of ultrasonic irrigation in root canal treatment: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials and meta-analysis.超声冲洗在根管治疗中的抗菌效果:随机临床试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Oral Investig. 2023 Apr;27(4):1343-1361. doi: 10.1007/s00784-023-04897-4. Epub 2023 Feb 9.
6
Effect of passive ultrasonic activation on microorganisms in primary root canal infection: a randomized clinical trial.被动超声激活对原发性根管感染中微生物的影响:一项随机临床试验。
J Appl Oral Sci. 2019 Nov 28;28:e20190100. doi: 10.1590/1678-7757-2019-0100. eCollection 2020.
7
Effectiveness of ultrasonically activated irrigation on root canal disinfection: a systematic review of in vitro studies.超声激活冲洗在根管消毒中的效果:体外研究的系统评价。
Clin Oral Investig. 2018 Mar;22(2):655-670. doi: 10.1007/s00784-018-2345-x. Epub 2018 Jan 25.
8
Enhancing antibacterial effect of sodium hypochlorite by low electric current-assisted sonic agitation.通过低电流辅助超声搅拌增强次氯酸钠的抗菌效果。
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 30;12(8):e0183895. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183895. eCollection 2017.
9
Eradication of Intracanal Enterococcus Faecalis Biofilm by Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation and RinsEndo System.通过被动超声冲洗和RinsEndo系统根除根管内粪肠球菌生物膜
Acta Stomatol Croat. 2016 Mar;50(1):14-22. doi: 10.15644/asc50/1/3.