Suppr超能文献

微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术治疗腰椎滑脱症和退行性脊柱疾病:5 年结果。

Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for spondylolisthesis and degenerative spondylosis: 5-year results.

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, National Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 1232, Baeksok Street, Ilsan District, Goyang City, Gyeonggi Province, 410-719, Republic of Korea,

出版信息

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Jun;472(6):1813-23. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-3241-y. Epub 2013 Aug 18.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Multiple studies have reported favorable short-term results after treatment of spondylolisthesis and other degenerative lumbar diseases with minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. However, to our knowledge, results at a minimum of 5 years have not been reported.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We determined (1) changes to the Oswestry Disability Index, (2) frequency of radiographic fusion, (3) complications and reoperations, and (4) the learning curve associated with minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion at minimum 5-year followup.

METHODS

We reviewed our first 124 patients who underwent minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion to treat low-grade spondylolisthesis and degenerative lumbar diseases and did not need a major deformity correction. This represented 63% (124 of 198) of the transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion procedures we performed for those indications during the study period (2003-2007). Eighty-three (67%) patients had complete 5-year followup. Plain radiographs and CT scans were evaluated by two reviewers. Trends of surgical time, blood loss, and hospital stay over time were examined by logarithmic curve fit-regression analysis to evaluate the learning curve.

RESULTS

At 5 years, mean Oswestry Disability Index improved from 60 points preoperatively to 24 points and 79 of 83 patients (95%) had improvement of greater than 10 points. At 5 years, 67 of 83 (81%) achieved radiographic fusion, including 64 of 72 patients (89%) who had single-level surgery. Perioperative complications occurred in 11 of 124 patients (9%), and another surgical procedure was performed in eight of 124 patients (6.5%) involving the index level and seven of 124 patients (5.6%) at adjacent levels. There were slowly decreasing trends of surgical time and hospital stay only in single-level surgery and almost no change in intraoperative blood loss over time, suggesting a challenging learning curve.

CONCLUSIONS

Oswestry Disability Index scores improved for patients with spondylolisthesis and degenerative lumbar diseases treated with minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion at minimum 5-year followup. We suggest this procedure is reasonable for properly selected patients with these indications; however, traditional approaches should still be performed for patients with high-grade spondylolisthesis, patients with a severely collapsed disc space and no motion seen on the dynamic radiographs, patients who need multilevel decompression and arthrodesis, and patients with kyphoscoliosis needing correction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, therapeutic study. See the Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

摘要

背景

多项研究报告称,微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术治疗腰椎滑脱症和其他退行性腰椎疾病可获得良好的短期效果。然而,据我们所知,至少 5 年的结果尚未报道。

问题/目的:我们确定了(1)Oswestry 功能障碍指数的变化,(2)影像学融合的频率,(3)并发症和再次手术,以及(4)微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术相关的学习曲线在至少 5 年的随访中。

方法

我们回顾了我们的前 124 例接受微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术治疗低级别腰椎滑脱症和退行性腰椎疾病的患者,且不需要进行主要畸形矫正。这代表了研究期间(2003-2007 年)我们为这些适应症进行的经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术的 63%(124 例中有 124 例)。83 例(67%)患者完成了 5 年的完整随访。由两名审阅者评估平片和 CT 扫描。通过对数曲线拟合-回归分析检查手术时间、失血量和住院时间随时间的趋势,以评估学习曲线。

结果

5 年后,Oswestry 功能障碍指数从术前的 60 分改善至 24 分,83 例患者中有 79 例(95%)改善超过 10 分。5 年后,83 例患者中有 67 例(81%)影像学融合,其中 72 例患者中有 64 例(89%)行单节段手术。124 例患者中有 11 例(9%)发生围手术期并发症,124 例患者中有 8 例(6.5%)进行了索引水平的另一次手术,124 例患者中有 7 例(5.6%)在相邻水平进行了手术。只有单节段手术的手术时间和住院时间呈逐渐下降趋势,而术中失血量几乎没有随时间变化,表明学习曲线具有挑战性。

结论

微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术治疗腰椎滑脱症和退行性腰椎疾病的患者,Oswestry 功能障碍指数评分在至少 5 年的随访中得到改善。我们建议对于有这些适应症的合适患者,该手术是合理的;然而,对于高级别腰椎滑脱症、动态影像学检查显示椎间盘严重塌陷且无运动的患者、需要多节段减压和融合的患者以及需要矫正脊柱后凸的患者,仍应采用传统方法。

证据水平

IV 级,治疗性研究。请参阅作者说明,以获取完整的证据水平描述。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验