• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

生物医学期刊中的挂名作者现象:有多普遍,为何存在?

Honorary authorship in biomedical journals: how common is it and why does it exist?

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Kuwait University, , Kuwait, Kuwait.

出版信息

J Med Ethics. 2014 May;40(5):346-8. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2012-101311. Epub 2013 Aug 17.

DOI:10.1136/medethics-2012-101311
PMID:23955369
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The number of coauthors in the medical literature has increased over the past 50 years as authorship continues to have important academic, social and financial implications.

AIM AND METHOD

The study aim was to determine the prevalence of honorary authorship in biomedical publications and identify the factors that lead to its existence. An email with a survey link was sent anonymously to 9283 corresponding authors of PubMed articles published within 1 year of contact.

RESULTS

A completed survey was obtained from 1246 corresponding authors, a response rate of 15.75%. One-third (33.4%) admitted that they had added authors who did not deserve authorship credit. Origin of the study from Europe and Asia (p ≤ 0.001 and 0.005, respectively), study type as case report/case series (p=0.036) and increasing number of coauthors were found to be the associated factors on multivariate analysis. Journal impact factor was also found to be associated with honorary authorship (mean journal impact factor was 4.82 (SD 6.32) for those who self-reported honorary authorship and 5.60 (SD 7.13) for those who did not report unjust authorship, p=0.05). In retrospect, 75% of the authors indicated that they would remove unjustified names from the authorship list. Reasons for adding honorary authors were complimentary (39.4%), to avoid conflict at work (16.1%), to facilitate article acceptance (7.2%), and other (3.6%).

CONCLUSIONS

Honorary authorship is relatively common in biomedical publications. Researchers should comply with the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors' criteria for authorship.

摘要

背景

随着作者身份继续具有重要的学术、社会和经济意义,医学文献中的合著者数量在过去 50 年中有所增加。

目的和方法

本研究旨在确定生物医学出版物中荣誉作者的流行程度,并确定导致其存在的因素。向在联系后一年内发表在 PubMed 文章中的 9283 位对应作者匿名发送带有调查链接的电子邮件。

结果

从 1246 位对应作者中获得了一份完整的调查问卷,回复率为 15.75%。三分之一(33.4%)的作者承认他们添加了没有作者身份的作者。研究起源于欧洲和亚洲(分别为 p≤0.001 和 0.005)、研究类型为病例报告/病例系列(p=0.036)以及合著者数量的增加在多变量分析中被发现是相关因素。期刊影响因子也与荣誉作者有关(自我报告荣誉作者的平均期刊影响因子为 4.82(SD 6.32),而未报告不公正作者的期刊影响因子为 5.60(SD 7.13),p=0.05)。事后,75%的作者表示他们将从作者名单中删除不合理的名字。添加荣誉作者的原因包括:表示感谢(39.4%)、避免工作中的冲突(16.1%)、为了促进文章被接受(7.2%)以及其他原因(3.6%)。

结论

荣誉作者在生物医学出版物中较为常见。研究人员应遵守国际医学期刊编辑委员会的作者标准。

相似文献

1
Honorary authorship in biomedical journals: how common is it and why does it exist?生物医学期刊中的挂名作者现象:有多普遍,为何存在?
J Med Ethics. 2014 May;40(5):346-8. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2012-101311. Epub 2013 Aug 17.
2
Prevalence of honorary coauthorship in the American Journal of Roentgenology.《美国放射学期刊》中荣誉合著的流行情况。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012 Jun;198(6):1247-55. doi: 10.2214/AJR.11.8253.
3
Honorary authorship in radiologic research articles: do geographic factors influence the frequency?放射学研究文章中的挂名作者:地理因素是否影响其出现频率?
Radiology. 2014 May;271(2):472-8. doi: 10.1148/radiol.13131710. Epub 2013 Nov 27.
4
Honorary authorship in radiologic research articles: assessment of frequency and associated factors.放射学研究文章中的挂名作者:频率及相关因素评估。
Radiology. 2011 May;259(2):479-86. doi: 10.1148/radiol.11101500. Epub 2011 Mar 8.
5
Honorary authorship: frequency and associated factors in physical medicine and rehabilitation research articles.荣誉作者署名:物理医学与康复研究文章中的频率及相关因素。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014 Mar;95(3):418-28. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.09.024. Epub 2013 Nov 8.
6
Honorary authorship epidemic in scholarly publications? How the current use of citation-based evaluative metrics make (pseudo)honorary authors from honest contributors of every multi-author article.学术出版物中的名誉作者泛滥?当前基于引文的评价指标的使用如何使每篇多作者文章中诚实的贡献者变成(伪)名誉作者。
J Med Ethics. 2013 Aug;39(8):509-12. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2012-100568. Epub 2012 Aug 3.
7
Guest authors in an Iranian journal.客座作者在伊朗期刊上。
Dev World Bioeth. 2014 Apr;14(1):15-9. doi: 10.1111/dewb.12002. Epub 2012 Oct 1.
8
Prevalence of articles with honorary authors and ghost authors in peer-reviewed medical journals.同行评审医学期刊中存在名誉作者和代笔作者文章的比例。
JAMA. 1998 Jul 15;280(3):222-4. doi: 10.1001/jama.280.3.222.
9
Responsible authorship: why researchers must forgo honorary authorship.责任作者制:研究人员为何必须放弃挂名作者。
Account Res. 2011 Mar;18(2):76-90. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2011.557297.
10
Frequency and Factors Associated With Honorary Authorship in Indian Biomedical Journals: Analysis of Papers Published From 2012 to 2013.印度生物医学期刊中荣誉作者的频率及相关因素:对2012年至2013年发表论文的分析
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2018 Apr;13(2):187-195. doi: 10.1177/1556264617751475. Epub 2018 Jan 18.

引用本文的文献

1
The increasing authorship trend in neuroscience: A scientometric analysis across 11 countries.神经科学领域作者数量不断增加的趋势:对11个国家的科学计量分析。
IBRO Neurosci Rep. 2024 May 26;17:52-57. doi: 10.1016/j.ibneur.2024.05.012. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
Quantitative research assessment: using metrics against gamed metrics.定量研究评估:使用指标对抗被操纵的指标。
Intern Emerg Med. 2024 Jan;19(1):39-47. doi: 10.1007/s11739-023-03447-w. Epub 2023 Nov 3.
3
Bibliometrics as a promising tool for solving publication ethics issues.
文献计量学作为解决出版伦理问题的一种有前景的工具。
Heliyon. 2022 Mar 16;8(3):e09123. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09123. eCollection 2022 Mar.
4
Writing for "International Orthopaedics": authorship, fraud, and ethical concerns.为《国际骨科学》撰稿:作者身份、欺诈及伦理问题。
Int Orthop. 2021 Oct;45(10):2461-2464. doi: 10.1007/s00264-021-05226-8.
5
TeamTree analysis: A new approach to evaluate scientific production.团队树分析:一种评估科研产出的新方法。
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 21;16(7):e0253847. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253847. eCollection 2021.
6
Publication Ethics.出版伦理
Indian Pediatr. 2021 Aug 15;58(8):781-785. doi: 10.1007/s13312-021-2291-6. Epub 2021 Apr 20.
7
Effect of Research Impact on Emerging Camel Husbandry, Welfare and Social-Related Awareness.研究影响对新兴骆驼养殖、福利及社会相关认知的作用
Animals (Basel). 2020 Apr 30;10(5):780. doi: 10.3390/ani10050780.
8
Bibliometric and authorship trends over a 30 year publication history in two representative US sports medicine journals.美国两份具有代表性的运动医学期刊30年出版历史中的文献计量学和作者趋势。
Heliyon. 2020 Mar 31;6(3):e03698. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03698. eCollection 2020 Mar.
9
Accommodating an Uninvited Guest: Perspectives of Researchers in Switzerland on 'Honorary' Authorship.容纳不速之客:瑞士研究人员对“荣誉”作者身份的看法。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2020 Apr;26(2):947-967. doi: 10.1007/s11948-019-00162-8. Epub 2019 Nov 29.
10
Researchers' Perceptions of Ethical Authorship Distribution in Collaborative Research Teams.研究人员对合作研究团队中伦理作者署名分配的看法。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2020 Aug;26(4):1995-2022. doi: 10.1007/s11948-019-00113-3. Epub 2019 Jun 4.